Literature DB >> 25407438

Genetic and environmental variances of bone microarchitecture and bone remodeling markers: a twin study.

Åshild Bjørnerem1, Minh Bui, Xiaofang Wang, Ali Ghasem-Zadeh, John L Hopper, Roger Zebaze, Ego Seeman.   

Abstract

All genetic and environmental factors contributing to differences in bone structure between individuals mediate their effects through the final common cellular pathway of bone modeling and remodeling. We hypothesized that genetic factors account for most of the population variance of cortical and trabecular microstructure, in particular intracortical porosity and medullary size - void volumes (porosity), which establish the internal bone surface areas or interfaces upon which modeling and remodeling deposit or remove bone to configure bone microarchitecture. Microarchitecture of the distal tibia and distal radius and remodeling markers were measured for 95 monozygotic (MZ) and 66 dizygotic (DZ) white female twin pairs aged 40 to 61 years. Images obtained using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography were analyzed using StrAx1.0, a nonthreshold-based software that quantifies cortical matrix and porosity. Genetic and environmental components of variance were estimated under the assumptions of the classic twin model. The data were consistent with the proportion of variance accounted for by genetic factors being: 72% to 81% (standard errors ∼18%) for the distal tibial total, cortical, and medullary cross-sectional area (CSA); 67% and 61% for total cortical porosity, before and after adjusting for total CSA, respectively; 51% for trabecular volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD; all p < 0.001). For the corresponding distal radius traits, genetic factors accounted for 47% to 68% of the variance (all p ≤ 0.001). Cross-twin cross-trait correlations between tibial cortical porosity and medullary CSA were higher for MZ (rMZ  = 0.49) than DZ (rDZ  = 0.27) pairs before (p = 0.024), but not after (p = 0.258), adjusting for total CSA. For the remodeling markers, the data were consistent with genetic factors accounting for 55% to 62% of the variance. We infer that middle-aged women differ in their bone microarchitecture and remodeling markers more because of differences in their genetic factors than differences in their environment.
© 2014 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BONE MICROARCHITECTURE; FEMALES; HERITABILITY; POROSITY; TWINS

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25407438     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.2365

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  12 in total

Review 1.  The genetics of bone mass and susceptibility to bone diseases.

Authors:  David Karasik; Fernando Rivadeneira; Mark L Johnson
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 20.543

2.  Heritability and Genetic Correlations for Bone Microarchitecture: The Framingham Study Families.

Authors:  David Karasik; Serkalem Demissie; Yanhua Zhou; Darlene Lu; Kerry E Broe; Mary L Bouxsein; L Adrienne Cupples; Douglas P Kiel
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Interaction between LRP5 and periostin gene polymorphisms on serum periostin levels and cortical bone microstructure.

Authors:  J Pepe; N Bonnet; F R Herrmann; E Biver; R Rizzoli; T Chevalley; S L Ferrari
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  The clinical contribution of cortical porosity to fragility fractures.

Authors:  Åshild Bjørnerem
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2016-10-26

5.  Bone Strength Estimated by Micro-Finite Element Analysis (µFEA) Is Heritable and Shares Genetic Predisposition With Areal BMD: The Framingham Study.

Authors:  David Karasik; Serkalem Demissie; Darlene Lu; Kerry E Broe; Steven K Boyd; Ching-Ti Liu; Yi-Hsiang Hsu; Mary L Bouxsein; Douglas P Kiel
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Lack of Influence of Vitamin D Receptor BsmI (rs1544410) Polymorphism on the Rate of Bone Loss in a Cohort of Postmenopausal Spanish Women Affected by Osteoporosis and Followed for Five Years.

Authors:  Maria Pedrera-Canal; Jose M Moran; Vicente Vera; Raul Roncero-Martin; Jesus M Lavado-Garcia; Ignacio Aliaga; Juan D Pedrera-Zamorano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Growth and Age-Related Abnormalities in Cortical Structure and Fracture Risk.

Authors:  Ego Seeman
Journal:  Endocrinol Metab (Seoul)       Date:  2015-09-22

8.  Bone trait ranking in the population is not established during antenatal growth but is robustly established in the first postnatal year.

Authors:  Lise Skåren; Xiaofang Wang; Åshild Bjørnerem
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  High Fidelity of Mouse Models Mimicking Human Genetic Skeletal Disorders.

Authors:  Robert Brommage; Claes Ohlsson
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 5.555

10.  Intensity of resistance training via self-reported history is critical in properly characterizing musculoskeletal health.

Authors:  Todd C Shoepe; Joseph W LaBrie; Grant T Mello; Allison G Leggett; Hawley C Almstedt
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.