R Hamel1, S Köhler1, N Sistermans2, T Koene3, Y Pijnenburg2, W van der Flier2, P Scheltens2, P Aalten1, F Verhey1, P J Visser1, I Ramakers1. 1. Alzheimer Centre Limburg, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University Medical Centre,Maastricht,The Netherlands. 2. Department of Neurology and Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam,VUmc Alzheimer Centre, VUmc Medical Centre,Amsterdam,The Netherlands. 3. Department of Medical Psychology and Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam,VUmc Alzheimer Centre, VUmc Medical Centre,Amsterdam,The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We investigated the course of decline in multiple cognitive domains in non-demented subjects from a memory clinic setting, and compared pattern, onset and magnitude of decline between subjects who progressed to Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia at follow-up and subjects who did not progress. METHOD: In this retrospective cohort study 819 consecutive non-demented patients who visited the memory clinics in Maastricht or Amsterdam between 1987 and 2010 were followed until they became demented or for a maximum of 10 years (range 0.5-10 years). Differences in trajectories of episodic memory, executive functioning, verbal fluency, and information processing speed/attention between converters to AD dementia and subjects remaining non-demented were compared by means of random effects modelling. RESULTS: The cognitive performance of converters and non-converters could already be differentiated seven (episodic memory) to three (verbal fluency and executive functioning) years prior to dementia diagnosis. Converters declined in these three domains, while non-converters remained stable on episodic memory and executive functioning and showed modest decline in verbal fluency. There was no evidence of decline in information processing speed/attention in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in cognitive performance between converters to AD dementia and subjects remaining non-demented could be established 7 years prior to diagnosis for episodic memory, with verbal fluency and executive functioning following several years later. Therefore, in addition to early episodic memory decline, decline in executive functions may also flag incident AD dementia. By contrast, change in information processing speed/attention seems less informative.
BACKGROUND: We investigated the course of decline in multiple cognitive domains in non-demented subjects from a memory clinic setting, and compared pattern, onset and magnitude of decline between subjects who progressed to Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia at follow-up and subjects who did not progress. METHOD: In this retrospective cohort study 819 consecutive non-demented patients who visited the memory clinics in Maastricht or Amsterdam between 1987 and 2010 were followed until they became demented or for a maximum of 10 years (range 0.5-10 years). Differences in trajectories of episodic memory, executive functioning, verbal fluency, and information processing speed/attention between converters to AD dementia and subjects remaining non-demented were compared by means of random effects modelling. RESULTS: The cognitive performance of converters and non-converters could already be differentiated seven (episodic memory) to three (verbal fluency and executive functioning) years prior to dementia diagnosis. Converters declined in these three domains, while non-converters remained stable on episodic memory and executive functioning and showed modest decline in verbal fluency. There was no evidence of decline in information processing speed/attention in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in cognitive performance between converters to AD dementia and subjects remaining non-demented could be established 7 years prior to diagnosis for episodic memory, with verbal fluency and executive functioning following several years later. Therefore, in addition to early episodic memory decline, decline in executive functions may also flag incident AD dementia. By contrast, change in information processing speed/attention seems less informative.
Authors: Melissa A Lancaster; Michael Seidenberg; J Carson Smith; Kristy A Nielson; John L Woodard; Sally Durgerian; Stephen M Rao Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2016-11 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Paul S Aisen; Jeffrey Cummings; Clifford R Jack; John C Morris; Reisa Sperling; Lutz Frölich; Roy W Jones; Sherie A Dowsett; Brandy R Matthews; Joel Raskin; Philip Scheltens; Bruno Dubois Journal: Alzheimers Res Ther Date: 2017-08-09 Impact factor: 6.982
Authors: Amer M Burhan; Udunna C Anazodo; Jun Ku Chung; Amanda Arena; Ariel Graff-Guerrero; Derek G V Mitchell Journal: Behav Neurol Date: 2016-02-01 Impact factor: 3.342