Literature DB >> 25406883

Periorbital burns – a 6 year review of management and outcome.

Edmund Fitzgerald O'Connor1, Q Frew2, A Din3, J Pleat4, S Ashraff3, S Ghazi-Nouri5, N El-Muttardi3, B Philp3, P Dziewulski2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Periorbital burns are an infrequent but potentially devastating injury. This study aimed to elucidate the spectrum of such injuries presenting to a UK burns centre and the outcome achieved in the cases requiring periorbital reconstruction for the restoration of function and form.
METHODS: Patients admitted to a UK regional burns centre between January 2005 and January 2011 with periorbital burns were identified from the Patient Administration System (PAS), theatre logs and the International Burns Injury database (IBID). Multiple parameters were assessed using patient notes, ITU and hospital image databases.
RESULTS: Over 6 years, 167 patients with facial burns requiring surgery were treated, including 103 patients with eyelid burns. The mean burn size was 33% total body surface area. The eyelid burn depth varied; 67% superficial partial thickness, 17% deep dermal and 16% full thickness. Two patients lost complete vision in one eye, one patient underwent amniotic membrane grafting. In total 16 patients required periorbital reconstruction to maintain eye closure, with 1.8 operations on average per patient. Acute surgery was required in 11 patients, whilst late intervention (>3 months) was needed in 5, 2 patients had both acute and delayed surgery. Of the 5 late intervention patients 4 were treated with full thickness skin grafts and 1 with a Z plasty. Average time for final reconstruction with delayed surgery was 4.5 months.
CONCLUSION: The goal in management of periorbital burns is preservation of vision, prevention of future complications and restoration of an acceptable aesthetic outcome. Total visual loss is thankfully rare, but early ophthalmology intervention is vital given the evidence of corneal damage as a brief therapeutic window exists.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Burns; Facial burns; Ocular injury

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25406883     DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2014.08.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Burns        ISSN: 0305-4179            Impact factor:   2.744


  7 in total

1.  A rare case of a direct ocular contact burn to the right eye.

Authors:  S Young; R Murphy; S Iyer
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Not all is lost: journey of a deep periorbital burn.

Authors:  Swati Singh; Purvasha Narang; Ankur Sood; Vikas Mittal
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2017-10-27

3.  Eyelid Chemical Burns: A Multidisciplinary And Challenging Approach.

Authors:  C Keilani; A De Faria; A Baus; M Delbarre; J V Schaal; F Froussart-Maille; E Bey; P Duhamel
Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters       Date:  2021-12-31

4.  Bifurcated Superficial Temporal Artery Island Flap for the Reconstruction of a Periorbital Burn: An Innovation.

Authors:  Tarek M Elbanoby; Amr Elbatawy; Gaber M Aly; Wael Ayad; Yasser Helmy; Emad Helmy; Khallad Sholkamy; Hazem Dahshan; Abdallah Al-Hady
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-06-17

Review 5.  Surgical treatment algorithms for post-burn contractures.

Authors:  Kenji Hayashida; Sadanori Akita
Journal:  Burns Trauma       Date:  2017-03-14

6.  Periorbital lesions in severely burned patients.

Authors:  Andreea Grosu-Bularda; Mihaela-Cristina Andrei; Anca Daniela Mladin; Maria Ionescu Sanda; Maria-Magdalena Dringa; Dragos Constantin Lunca; Ioan Lascar; Razvan Nicolae Teodoreanu
Journal:  Rom J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019 Jan-Mar

7.  An Unusual Pure Periorbital Electrical Injury: A Case Report.

Authors:  Gholamreza Motazedian; Ali Khojasteh
Journal:  World J Plast Surg       Date:  2021-05
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.