Literature DB >> 25406533

Comparison of airborne bacterial communities from a hog farm and spray field.

Ann M Arfken1,2, Bongkeun Song1,2,3, Jung-Suk Sung3.   

Abstract

Airborne bacteria from hog farms may have detrimental impacts on human health, particularly in terms of antibiotic resistance and pathogen zoonosis. Despite human health risks, very little is known about the composition and diversity of airborne bacteria from hog farms and hog-related spray fields. We used pyrosequencing analysis of 16S rRNA genes to compare airborne bacterial communities in a North Carolina hog farm and lagoon spray field. In addition, we isolated and identified antibiotic-resistant bacteria from both air samples. Based on 16S rRNA gene pyrosequence analysis, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, and Proteobacteria were the dominant phyla in airborne bacterial communities from both hog farm and spray field sites. Within the Firmicutes genera, Clostridium spp. were more abundant in the hog farm, whereas Staphylococcus spp. were higher in the spray field. The presence of opportunitic pathogens, including several Staphylococcus species and Propionibacterium acnes, was detected in both bioaerosol communities based on phylogenetic analysis. The isolation and identification of antibiotic-resistant bacteria from air samples also showed similar results with dominance of Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria in both hog farm and spray field air. Thus, the existence of opportunistic pathogens and antibiotic resistant bacteria in airborne communities evidences potential health risks to farmers and other residents from swine bioaerosol exposure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25406533     DOI: 10.4014/jmb.1408.08005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 1017-7825            Impact factor:   2.351


  5 in total

1.  Identification of fungal metabolites from inside Gallus gallus domesticus eggshells by non-invasively detecting volatile organic compounds (VOCs).

Authors:  Raquel Cumeras; Alexander A Aksenov; Alberto Pasamontes; Alexander G Fung; Amanda N Cianchetta; Hung Doan; R Michael Davis; Cristina E Davis
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 4.142

Review 2.  The Use of Bioaerosol Sampling for Airborne Virus Surveillance in Swine Production Facilities: A Mini Review.

Authors:  Benjamin D Anderson; John A Lednicky; Montserrat Torremorell; Gregory C Gray
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2017-07-27

3.  Bioaerosols Play a Major Role in the Nasopharyngeal Microbiota Content in Agricultural Environment.

Authors:  Hamza Mbareche; Marc Veillette; Jonathan Pilote; Valérie Létourneau; Caroline Duchaine
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Ranking hazards pertaining to human health concerns from land application of anaerobic digestate.

Authors:  Rajat Nag; Paul Whyte; Bryan K Markey; Vincent O'Flaherty; Declan Bolton; Owen Fenton; Karl G Richards; Enda Cummins
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 7.963

5.  Vertical Stratification in Urban Green Space Aerobiomes.

Authors:  Jake M Robinson; Christian Cando-Dumancela; Craig Liddicoat; Philip Weinstein; Ross Cameron; Martin F Breed
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 9.031

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.