J Scott McNally1, Michael S McLaughlin2, Peter J Hinckley2, Scott M Treiman2, Gregory J Stoddard2, Dennis L Parker2, Gerald S Treiman2. 1. From the Utah Center for Advanced Imaging Research, Department of Radiology (J.S.M., M.S.M., P.J.H., S.M.T., D.L.P., G.S.T.), Study Design and Biostatistics Center, Department of Orthopedics (G.J.S.), and Department of Surgery (G.S.T.), University of Utah, Salt Lake City; and Department of Surgery, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, UT (G.S.T.). scott.mcnally@hsc.utah.edu. 2. From the Utah Center for Advanced Imaging Research, Department of Radiology (J.S.M., M.S.M., P.J.H., S.M.T., D.L.P., G.S.T.), Study Design and Biostatistics Center, Department of Orthopedics (G.J.S.), and Department of Surgery (G.S.T.), University of Utah, Salt Lake City; and Department of Surgery, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, UT (G.S.T.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH) is associated with acute and future stroke. IPH is also associated with lumen markers of stroke risk including stenosis, plaque thickness, and ulceration. Whether IPH adds further predictive value to these other variables is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine whether IPH improves carotid-source stroke prediction. METHODS: In this retrospective cross-sectional study, patients undergoing stroke workup were imaged with MRI and IPH detection. Seven hundred twenty-six carotid-brain image pairs were analyzed after excluding vessels with noncarotid plaque stroke sources (420) and occlusions (7) or near-occlusions (3). Carotid imaging characteristics were recorded, including percent diameter and mm stenosis, plaque thickness, ulceration, intraluminal thrombus, and IPH. Clinical confounders were recorded, and a multivariable logistic regression model was fitted. Backward elimination was used to determine essential carotid-source stroke predictors with a threshold 2-sided P<0.10. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to determine discriminatory value. RESULTS: Significant predictors of carotid-source stroke included intraluminal thrombus (odds ratio=103.6; P<0.001), IPH (odds ratio=25.2; P<0.001), current smoking (odds ratio=2.78; P=0.004), and thickness (odds ratio=1.24; P=0.020). The final model discriminatory value was excellent (area under the curve=0.862). This was significantly higher than the final model without IPH (area under the curve=0.814), or models using only stenosis as a continuous variable (area under the curve=0.770) or cutoffs of 50% and 70% (area under the curve=0.669), P<0.001. CONCLUSIONS: After excluding patients with noncarotid plaque stroke sources, optimal discrimination of carotid-source stroke was obtained with intraluminal thrombus, IPH, plaque thickness, and smoking history but not ulceration and stenosis.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH) is associated with acute and future stroke. IPH is also associated with lumen markers of stroke risk including stenosis, plaque thickness, and ulceration. Whether IPH adds further predictive value to these other variables is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine whether IPH improves carotid-source stroke prediction. METHODS: In this retrospective cross-sectional study, patients undergoing stroke workup were imaged with MRI and IPH detection. Seven hundred twenty-six carotid-brain image pairs were analyzed after excluding vessels with noncarotid plaque stroke sources (420) and occlusions (7) or near-occlusions (3). Carotid imaging characteristics were recorded, including percent diameter and mm stenosis, plaque thickness, ulceration, intraluminal thrombus, and IPH. Clinical confounders were recorded, and a multivariable logistic regression model was fitted. Backward elimination was used to determine essential carotid-source stroke predictors with a threshold 2-sided P<0.10. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to determine discriminatory value. RESULTS: Significant predictors of carotid-source stroke included intraluminal thrombus (odds ratio=103.6; P<0.001), IPH (odds ratio=25.2; P<0.001), current smoking (odds ratio=2.78; P=0.004), and thickness (odds ratio=1.24; P=0.020). The final model discriminatory value was excellent (area under the curve=0.862). This was significantly higher than the final model without IPH (area under the curve=0.814), or models using only stenosis as a continuous variable (area under the curve=0.770) or cutoffs of 50% and 70% (area under the curve=0.669), P<0.001. CONCLUSIONS: After excluding patients with noncarotid plaque stroke sources, optimal discrimination of carotid-source stroke was obtained with intraluminal thrombus, IPH, plaque thickness, and smoking history but not ulceration and stenosis.
Authors: C Zhu; X Tian; A J Degnan; Z Shi; X Zhang; L Chen; Z Teng; D Saloner; J Lu; Q Liu Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2018-05-24 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Matthew D Alexander; Adam de Havenon; Seong-Eun Kim; Dennis L Parker; Joseph S McNally Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2019-01-24 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Matthew T Chrencik; Amir A Khan; Lauren Luther; Laila Anthony; John Yokemick; Jigar Patel; John D Sorkin; Siddhartha Sikdar; Brajesh K Lal Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2019-03-06 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Hediyeh Baradaran; Sinead Culleton; Greg Stoddard; Matthew D Alexander; J Rafael Romero; J Rock Hadley; Seong-Eun Kim; Dennis L Parker; J Scott McNally Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2022-10-24 Impact factor: 2.995
Authors: J Scott McNally; Peter J Hinckley; Akihiko Sakata; Laura B Eisenmenger; Seong-Eun Kim; Adam H De Havenon; Edward P Quigley; Eli Iacob; Gerald S Treiman; Dennis L Parker Journal: Stroke Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: M S McLaughlin; P J Hinckley; S M Treiman; S-E Kim; G J Stoddard; D L Parker; G S Treiman; J S McNally Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2015-09-03 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: A S Larson; W Brinjikji; L Savastano; A A Rabinstein; L Saba; J Huston; J C Benson Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2021-04-22 Impact factor: 4.966