Literature DB >> 25406126

Electroencephalographic Response to Different Odors in Healthy Individuals: A Promising Tool for Objective Assessment of Olfactory Disorders.

Magdalena Krbot Skorić1, Ivan Adamec1, Ana Branka Jerbić2, Tereza Gabelić1, Sanja Hajnšek3, Mario Habek4.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to examine human central nervous system response to three different odors. Electrophysiological activity was recorded in the baseline state and for 3 odors, lemon, peppermint, and vanilla, in 16 healthy participants. Electrodes were separated into groups according to the spatial position on the head. Fast Fourier transformation was performed on every set, and mean value of activity in theta was exported. As theta showed statistically significant results, further analysis was based only on the theta frequency band. On electrodes FP1, F3, Fz, F4, F8, T7, C3, Cz, C4, T8, TP9, CP5, CP1, CP2, CP6, P7, P3, Pz, P4, P8, PO9, and PO10 there was statistically significant difference in the electrical activity of the brain between four conditions. For peppermint and lemon, there was statistically significant difference in activity between different regions-F(1.576, 23.637)=16.030, P=.000 and F(1.362, 20.425)=4.54, P=.035, respectively-where the activity in the central area was significantly reduced compared with the activity in the other 4 areas and in the left and right anterior and left posterior area, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference for vanilla between specific areas, F(1.217, 18.257)=1.155, P=.309. The results indicate that olfactory stimuli can affect the frequency characteristics of the electrical activity of the brain. © EEG and Clinical Neuroscience Society (ECNS) 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EEG response; odor; theta band

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25406126     DOI: 10.1177/1550059414545649

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin EEG Neurosci        ISSN: 1550-0594            Impact factor:   1.843


  5 in total

Review 1.  Influence of Fragrances on Human Psychophysiological Activity: With Special Reference to Human Electroencephalographic Response.

Authors:  Kandhasamy Sowndhararajan; Songmun Kim
Journal:  Sci Pharm       Date:  2016-11-29

2.  Subjective craving and event-related brain response to olfactory and visual chocolate cues in binge-eating and healthy individuals.

Authors:  I Wolz; A Sauvaget; R Granero; G Mestre-Bach; M Baño; V Martín-Romera; M Veciana de Las Heras; S Jiménez-Murcia; A Jansen; A Roefs; F Fernández-Aranda
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Could the Olfactory System Be a Target for Homeopathic Remedies as Nanomedicines?

Authors:  Florence Courtens; Jean-Louis Demangeat; Mourad Benabdallah
Journal:  J Altern Complement Med       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 2.579

Review 4.  Assessment and Scientific Progresses in the Analysis of Olfactory Evoked Potentials.

Authors:  Pasquale Arpaia; Andrea Cataldo; Sabatina Criscuolo; Egidio De Benedetto; Antonio Masciullo; Raissa Schiavoni
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-12

5.  Olfactory Stimulation Effect of Aldehydes, Nonanal, and Decanal on the Human Electroencephalographic Activity, According to Nostril Variation.

Authors:  Minju Kim; Kandhasamy Sowndhararajan; Hae Jin Choi; Se Jin Park; Songmun Kim
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2019-07-31
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.