Literature DB >> 25405558

The Association Between Hospital Finances and Complications After Complex Abdominal Surgery: Deficiencies in the Current Health Care Reimbursement System and Implications for the Future.

William S Knechtle1, Sebastian D Perez, Rachel L Medbery, Bryce D Gartland, Patrick S Sullivan, Stuart J Knechtle, David A Kooby, Shishir K Maithel, Juan M Sarmiento, Virginia O Shaffer, Jahnavi K Srinivasan, Charles A Staley, John F Sweeney.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between complications after 3 common general surgery procedures and per-episode hospital finances.
BACKGROUND: With impending changes in health care reimbursement, maximizing the value of care delivered is paramount. Data on the relative clinical and financial impact of postoperative complications are necessary for directing surgical quality improvement efforts.
METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of patients enrolled in the American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy, hepatectomy, and colectomy at a single academic institution between September 2009 and August 2012. Clinical outcomes data were subsequently linked with hospital billing data to determine hospital finances associated with each episode. We describe the association between postoperative complications, hospital length of stay, and different financial metrics. Multivariable linear regression modeling tested linear association between postoperative outcomes and cost data.
RESULTS: There was a positive association between the number of surgical complications, payments, length of stay, total charges, total costs, and contribution margin for the three procedures. Multivariable models indicated that complications were independently associated with total cost among the selected procedures. Payments increased with complications, offsetting increased costs.
CONCLUSIONS: In the current fee-for-service environment, the financial incentives are misaligned with quality improvement efforts. As we move to a value-driven method of reimbursement, administrators and health care providers alike will need to focus on improving the quality of patient care while remaining conscious of the cost of care delivered. Reducing complications effectively improves value.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25405558     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  5 in total

1.  Hospital Volume and the Costs Associated with Surgery for Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Faiz Gani; Fabian M Johnston; Howard Nelson-Williams; Marcelo Cerullo; Mary E Dillhoff; Carl R Schmidt; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  The Effect of Timing on Breast Reconstruction Outcomes in Diabetic Women.

Authors:  Melanie Major; Chris Devulapalli; Ricardo J Bello; Pablo A Baltodano; Myrna Eliann Reinhardt; Michele A Manahan; Carisa M Cooney; Gedge D Rosson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-10-25

3.  The financial impact of postoperative complications following liver resection.

Authors:  Luka Cosic; Ronald Ma; Leonid Churilov; David Debono; Mehrdad Nikfarjam; Christopher Christophi; Laurence Weinberg
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.817

4.  Financial burden of postoperative complications following colonic resection: A systematic review.

Authors:  Maleck Louis; Samuel A Johnston; Leonid Churilov; Ronald Ma; Christopher Christophi; Laurence Weinberg
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 1.817

5.  Major postoperative complications are associated with impaired long-term survival after gastro-esophageal and pancreatic cancer surgery: a complete national cohort study.

Authors:  Eirik Kjus Aahlin; Frank Olsen; Bård Uleberg; Bjarne K Jacobsen; Kristoffer Lassen
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 2.102

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.