Literature DB >> 25404752

High-intensity interval training is not superior to other forms of endurance training during cardiac rehabilitation.

Marcus Tschentscher1, Jörg Eichinger1, Andreas Egger1, Silke Droese1, Martin Schönfelder1, Josef Niebauer2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: High-intensity interval training has recently emerged as superior to continuous endurance training in cardiac rehabilitation upon other training regimes. Individually tailored continuous endurance training and pyramid training could induce comparable effects on peak work capacity as high intensity interval training.
DESIGN: A prospective, randomized study.
METHODS: Effects of the following isocaloric cycle ergometer protocols on peak work capacity have been assessed in patients with coronary artery disease (n = 60) during 6 weeks of outpatient cardiac rehabilitation, i.e. 18 supervised sessions of exercise training: (1) continuous endurance training (n = 20): 33 min at 65-85% peak heart rate; (2) high intensity interval training (n = 20): 4 × 4 min intervals at 85-95% peak heart rate, each followed by 3 min of active recovery at 60-70% peak heart rate; (3) pyramid training (n = 20): 3 × 8 min of stepwise load increase and subsequent decrease from 65-95-65% peak heart rate, supplemented by 2 min recovery at 60-70% peak heart rate between pyramids. All protocols were preceded by 5 min of warm-up and followed by 5 min cool-down at 60-70% peak heart rate.
RESULTS: Attendance during exercise sessions was 99.2%. There were significant increases in peak work capacity of comparable magnitude in all three training groups (begin vs. end: continuous endurance training: 136.0 ± 49.6 W vs. 163.4 ± 60.8 W (21.1 ± 8.5%); high-intensity interval training: 141.0 ± 60.4 W vs. 171.1 ± 69.8 W (22.8 ± 6.6%); pyramid training: 128.7 ± 50.6 W vs. 158.5 ± 57.9 W (24.8 ± 10.8%); within groups all p < 0.001; between groups, p = not significant).
CONCLUSION: Endurance training protocols assessed in this study all led to significant increases in peak work capacity of comparable magnitude. Our findings suggest that these protocols can be used interchangeably, which will lead to further individualization of exercise prescription and may therefore result in improved adherence to lifelong behavioural changes. © The European Society of Cardiology 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coronary artery disease; exercise training; outpatients; physical work capacity; pyramid training

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25404752     DOI: 10.1177/2047487314560100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Prev Cardiol        ISSN: 2047-4873            Impact factor:   7.804


  15 in total

1.  CrossTalk opposing view: High intensity interval training does not have a role in risk reduction or treatment of disease.

Authors:  Tanya M Holloway; Lawrence L Spriet
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 2.  Aerobic Interval vs. Continuous Training in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease or Heart Failure: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with a Focus on Secondary Outcomes.

Authors:  Nele Pattyn; Randy Beulque; Véronique Cornelissen
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 3.  [Cardiac rehabilitation in heart failure].

Authors:  Johann Altenberger
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2017-10-02

4.  20 Things You Didn't Know About Exercise.

Authors:  Brittany Butts; Rebecca Gary
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.083

5.  Interval and continuous aerobic exercise training similarly increase cardiac function and autonomic modulation in infarcted mice.

Authors:  Cesar Cavinato Cal Abad; Ademir Manuel do Nascimento; Leandro Eziquiel de Souza; Diego Figueroa; Pamella Ramona; Michele Sartori; Katia B Scapini; Oscar Albuquerque; Ivana Cinthya Moraes-Silva; Hélio José Coelho-Júnior; Bruno Rodrigues; Cristiano Teixeira Mostarda; Kátia De Angelis; Maria Cláudia Irigoyen
Journal:  J Exerc Rehabil       Date:  2017-06-30

6.  Short-Term (<8 wk) High-Intensity Interval Training in Diseased Cohorts.

Authors:  James E M Blackwell; Brett Doleman; Philip J J Herrod; Samuel Ricketts; Bethan E Phillips; Jonathan N Lund; John P Williams
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 5.411

7.  Study protocol for the FITR Heart Study: Feasibility, safety, adherence, and efficacy of high intensity interval training in a hospital-initiated rehabilitation program for coronary heart disease.

Authors:  Jenna Taylor; Shelley E Keating; Michael D Leveritt; David J Holland; Sjaan R Gomersall; Jeff S Coombes
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2017-10-13

8.  High-Intensity Interval Training for Patients With Cardiovascular Disease-Is It Safe? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Michael A Wewege; Dohee Ahn; Jennifer Yu; Kevin Liou; Andrew Keech
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 5.501

9.  The difference in referencing in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar.

Authors:  Markus S Anker; Sara Hadzibegovic; Alessia Lena; Wilhelm Haverkamp
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2019-12-30

10.  Timed physical exercise does not influence circadian rhythms and glucose tolerance in rotating night shift workers: The EuRhythDia study.

Authors:  Juliane Hannemann; Anika Laing; Karin Glismann; Debra J Skene; Benita Middleton; Bart Staels; Nikolaus Marx; Peter J Grant; Massimo Federici; Josef Niebauer; Rainer Böger
Journal:  Diab Vasc Dis Res       Date:  2020 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.291

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.