Literature DB >> 25404313

Ethnic diversity deflates price bubbles.

Sheen S Levine1, Evan P Apfelbaum2, Mark Bernard3, Valerie L Bartelt4, Edward J Zajac5, David Stark6.   

Abstract

Markets are central to modern society, so their failures can be devastating. Here, we examine a prominent failure: price bubbles. Bubbles emerge when traders err collectively in pricing, causing misfit between market prices and the true values of assets. The causes of such collective errors remain elusive. We propose that bubbles are affected by ethnic homogeneity in the market and can be thwarted by diversity. In homogenous markets, traders place undue confidence in the decisions of others. Less likely to scrutinize others' decisions, traders are more likely to accept prices that deviate from true values. To test this, we constructed experimental markets in Southeast Asia and North America, where participants traded stocks to earn money. We randomly assigned participants to ethnically homogeneous or diverse markets. We find a marked difference: Across markets and locations, market prices fit true values 58% better in diverse markets. The effect is similar across sites, despite sizeable differences in culture and ethnic composition. Specifically, in homogenous markets, overpricing is higher as traders are more likely to accept speculative prices. Their pricing errors are more correlated than in diverse markets. In addition, when bubbles burst, homogenous markets crash more severely. The findings suggest that price bubbles arise not only from individual errors or financial conditions, but also from the social context of decision making. The evidence may inform public discussion on ethnic diversity: it may be beneficial not only for providing variety in perspectives and skills, but also because diversity facilitates friction that enhances deliberation and upends conformity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  decision making; diversity; economics; markets; psychology; sociology

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25404313      PMCID: PMC4284549          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1407301111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  12 in total

1.  Effects of racial diversity on complex thinking in college students.

Authors:  Anthony Lising Antonio; Mitchell J Chang; Kenji Hakuta; David A Kenny; Shana Levin; Jeffrey F Milem
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2004-08

2.  False-positive psychology: undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant.

Authors:  Joseph P Simmons; Leif D Nelson; Uri Simonsohn
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-10-17

3.  Most people are not WEIRD.

Authors:  Joseph Henrich; Steven J Heine; Ara Norenzayan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers.

Authors:  Lu Hong; Scott E Page
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-11-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Herding in humans.

Authors:  Ramsey M Raafat; Nick Chater; Chris Frith
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2009-09-11       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 6.  The age of extremes: concentrated affluence and poverty in the twenty-first century.

Authors:  D S Massey
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1996-11

7.  On racial diversity and group decision making: identifying multiple effects of racial composition on jury deliberations.

Authors:  Samuel R Sommers
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2006-04

8.  Adapting to a multicultural future.

Authors:  Richard J Crisp; Rose Meleady
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Initial cash/asset ratio and asset prices: an experimental study.

Authors:  G Caginalp; D Porter; V Smith
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-01-20       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Herding, social influence and economic decision-making: socio-psychological and neuroscientific analyses.

Authors:  Michelle Baddeley
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 6.671

View more
  20 in total

1.  Downsides of social capital.

Authors:  Alejandro Portes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Demographically diverse crowds are typically not much wiser than homogeneous crowds.

Authors:  Stephanie de Oliveira; Richard E Nisbett
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Race influences professional investors' financial judgments.

Authors:  Sarah Lyons-Padilla; Hazel Rose Markus; Ashby Monk; Sid Radhakrishna; Radhika Shah; Norris A Daryn Dodson; Jennifer L Eberhardt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Reducing achievement gaps in undergraduate general chemistry could lift underrepresented students into a "hyperpersistent zone".

Authors:  R B Harris; M R Mack; J Bryant; E J Theobald; S Freeman
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 14.136

5.  Diversity of opinions promotes herding in uncertain crowds.

Authors:  Joaquin Navajas; Oriane Armand; Rani Moran; Bahador Bahrami; Ophelia Deroy
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 3.653

Review 6.  Making better decisions in groups.

Authors:  Dan Bang; Chris D Frith
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 2.963

7.  Diversity in mixed species groups improves success in a novel feeder test in a wild songbird community.

Authors:  Todd M Freeberg; Shannon K Eppert; Kathryn E Sieving; Jeffrey R Lucas
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Social capital and transaction costs in millet markets.

Authors:  Damien Christophe Jacques; Eduardo Marinho; Raphaël d'Andrimont; François Waldner; Julien Radoux; Frédéric Gaspart; Pierre Defourny
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2018-01-12

9.  Product diffusion through on-demand information-seeking behaviour.

Authors:  Christoph Riedl; Johannes Bjelland; Geoffrey Canright; Asif Iqbal; Kenth Engø-Monsen; Taimur Qureshi; Pål Roe Sundsøy; David Lazer
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.118

10.  Modularity and composite diversity affect the collective gathering of information online.

Authors:  Niccolò Pescetelli; Alex Rutherford; Iyad Rahwan
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.