BACKGROUND: Rib fracture stabilization has become a more accepted practice although stabilization of the most cephalad ribs presents a unique challenge. We present our experience with use of a 90° drill and screwdriver to bridge these difficult rib fractures. METHODS: This retrospective review included patients who underwent rib fracture stabilization from August 1, 2009, through September 30, 2012. Patients were divided into two groups: those whose procedure used the 90° device and those that did not. Data were compared using standard statistical analysis and reported as percentages and medians [interquartile ranges]. P values <0.05 were considered significant. RESULTS: We identified 89 patients: 29 (33%) had 90° devices used and 60 (67%) did not. There were no differences between groups in age, sex, Trauma-Related Injury Severity Score, the presence of flail chest, occurrence of pneumonia, and intensive care unit or hospital length of stay. The Injury Severity Score was higher in the 90° group (22 vs. 16; P = 0.03). The highest rib stabilized was different between the 2 groups (3 [2-5] vs. 5 [2-9]; P = 0.001), with more third rib stabilizations in the 90° group (38 vs. 20%; P = 0.04) as well as more total number of ribs fixed (5 vs. 4; P = 0.001). There was no difference in operative time between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: The surgical reach for rib fracture stabilization has been extended with use of a 90° drill and screwdriver. High fractures under the scapula where access is technically challenging can be stabilized without prolonging operative times.
BACKGROUND: Rib fracture stabilization has become a more accepted practice although stabilization of the most cephalad ribs presents a unique challenge. We present our experience with use of a 90° drill and screwdriver to bridge these difficult rib fractures. METHODS: This retrospective review included patients who underwent rib fracture stabilization from August 1, 2009, through September 30, 2012. Patients were divided into two groups: those whose procedure used the 90° device and those that did not. Data were compared using standard statistical analysis and reported as percentages and medians [interquartile ranges]. P values <0.05 were considered significant. RESULTS: We identified 89 patients: 29 (33%) had 90° devices used and 60 (67%) did not. There were no differences between groups in age, sex, Trauma-Related Injury Severity Score, the presence of flail chest, occurrence of pneumonia, and intensive care unit or hospital length of stay. The Injury Severity Score was higher in the 90° group (22 vs. 16; P = 0.03). The highest rib stabilized was different between the 2 groups (3 [2-5] vs. 5 [2-9]; P = 0.001), with more third rib stabilizations in the 90° group (38 vs. 20%; P = 0.04) as well as more total number of ribs fixed (5 vs. 4; P = 0.001). There was no difference in operative time between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: The surgical reach for rib fracture stabilization has been extended with use of a 90° drill and screwdriver. High fractures under the scapula where access is technically challenging can be stabilized without prolonging operative times.
Authors: Marc de Moya; Thanos Bramos; Suresh Agarwal; Karim Fikry; Sumbal Janjua; David R King; Hasan B Alam; George C Velmahos; Peter Burke; William Tobler Journal: J Trauma Date: 2011-12
Authors: Silvana F Marasco; Andrew R Davies; Jamie Cooper; Dinesh Varma; Victoria Bennett; Rachael Nevill; Geraldine Lee; Michael Bailey; Mark Fitzgerald Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2013-02-13 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: S Schulz-Drost; S Grupp; M Pachowsky; P Oppel; S Krinner; A Mauerer; F F Hennig; A Langenbach Journal: Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Date: 2016-03-22 Impact factor: 3.693
Authors: A Langenbach; Pascal Oppel; Sina Grupp; Sebastian Krinner; Milena Pachowsky; Thomas Buder; Melanie Schulz-Drost; Friedrich F Hennig; Stefan Schulz-Drost Journal: Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Date: 2017-11-09 Impact factor: 3.693
Authors: Terry P Nickerson; Cornelius A Thiels; Brian D Kim; Martin D Zielinski; Donald H Jenkins; Henry J Schiller Journal: World J Surg Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Helen Ma Ingoe; Elizabeth Coleman; William Eardley; Amar Rangan; Catherine Hewitt; Catriona McDaid Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-04-01 Impact factor: 2.692