Literature DB >> 25403375

A meta-learning approach for B-cell conformational epitope prediction.

Yuh-Jyh Hu1, Shun-Chien Lin, Yu-Lung Lin, Kuan-Hui Lin, Shun-Ning You.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: One of the major challenges in the field of vaccine design is identifying B-cell epitopes in continuously evolving viruses. Various tools have been developed to predict linear or conformational epitopes, each relying on different physicochemical properties and adopting distinct search strategies. We propose a meta-learning approach for epitope prediction based on stacked and cascade generalizations. Through meta learning, we expect a meta learner to be able integrate multiple prediction models, and outperform the single best-performing model. The objective of this study is twofold: (1) to analyze the complementary predictive strengths in different prediction tools, and (2) to introduce a generic computational model to exploit the synergy among various prediction tools. Our primary goal is not to develop any particular classifier for B-cell epitope prediction, but to advocate the feasibility of meta learning to epitope prediction. With the flexibility of meta learning, the researcher can construct various meta classification hierarchies that are applicable to epitope prediction in different protein domains.
RESULTS: We developed the hierarchical meta-learning architectures based on stacked and cascade generalizations. The bottom level of the hierarchy consisted of four conformational and four linear epitope prediction tools that served as the base learners. To perform consistent and unbiased comparisons, we tested the meta-learning method on an independent set of antigen proteins that were not used previously to train the base epitope prediction tools. In addition, we conducted correlation and ablation studies of the base learners in the meta-learning model. Low correlation among the predictions of the base learners suggested that the eight base learners had complementary predictive capabilities. The ablation analysis indicated that the eight base learners differentially interacted and contributed to the final meta model. The results of the independent test demonstrated that the meta-learning approach markedly outperformed the single best-performing epitope predictor.
CONCLUSIONS: Computational B-cell epitope prediction tools exhibit several differences that affect their performances when predicting epitopic regions in protein antigens. The proposed meta-learning approach for epitope prediction combines multiple prediction tools by integrating their complementary predictive strengths. Our experimental results demonstrate the superior performance of the combined approach in comparison with single epitope predictors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25403375      PMCID: PMC4237749          DOI: 10.1186/s12859-014-0378-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1471-2105            Impact factor:   3.169


  28 in total

Review 1.  Predicting location of continuous epitopes in proteins from their primary structures.

Authors:  J L Pellequer; E Westhof; M H Van Regenmortel
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.600

2.  New hydrophilicity scale derived from high-performance liquid chromatography peptide retention data: correlation of predicted surface residues with antigenicity and X-ray-derived accessible sites.

Authors:  J M Parker; D Guo; R S Hodges
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1986-09-23       Impact factor: 3.162

3.  Correlation between the location of antigenic sites and the prediction of turns in proteins.

Authors:  J L Pellequer; E Westhof; M H Van Regenmortel
Journal:  Immunol Lett       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 3.685

4.  Protein sequence similarity searches using patterns as seeds.

Authors:  Z Zhang; A A Schäffer; W Miller; T L Madden; D J Lipman; E V Koonin; S F Altschul
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein.

Authors:  J Kyte; R F Doolittle
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1982-05-05       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  SEPPA 2.0--more refined server to predict spatial epitope considering species of immune host and subcellular localization of protein antigen.

Authors:  Tao Qi; Tianyi Qiu; Qingchen Zhang; Kailin Tang; Yangyang Fan; Jingxuan Qiu; Dingfeng Wu; Wei Zhang; Yanan Chen; Jun Gao; Ruixin Zhu; Zhiwei Cao
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Prediction of conformational B-cell epitopes from 3D structures by random forests with a distance-based feature.

Authors:  Wen Zhang; Yi Xiong; Meng Zhao; Hua Zou; Xinghuo Ye; Juan Liu
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Epitome: database of structure-inferred antigenic epitopes.

Authors:  Avner Schlessinger; Yanay Ofran; Guy Yachdav; Burkhard Rost
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Predicting linear B-cell epitopes using string kernels.

Authors:  Yasser El-Manzalawy; Drena Dobbs; Vasant Honavar
Journal:  J Mol Recognit       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.137

10.  Reliable B cell epitope predictions: impacts of method development and improved benchmarking.

Authors:  Jens Vindahl Kringelum; Claus Lundegaard; Ole Lund; Morten Nielsen
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  3 in total

1.  Conformational epitope matching and prediction based on protein surface spiral features.

Authors:  Ying-Tsang Lo; Tao-Chuan Shih; Tun-Wen Pai; Li-Ping Ho; Jen-Leih Wu; Hsin-Yiu Chou
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 3.969

2.  SEPIa, a knowledge-driven algorithm for predicting conformational B-cell epitopes from the amino acid sequence.

Authors:  Georgios A Dalkas; Marianne Rooman
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Modern deep learning in bioinformatics.

Authors:  Haoyang Li; Shuye Tian; Yu Li; Qiming Fang; Renbo Tan; Yijie Pan; Chao Huang; Ying Xu; Xin Gao
Journal:  J Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 6.216

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.