Gerd P Pfeifer1. 1. Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope, Duarte, California, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The mutational patterns of cancer genomes allow conclusions or generation of hypotheses as to what mechanisms or environmental, dietary or occupational exposures might have created the mutations and therefore will have contributed to the formation of the cancer. The arguments for cancer causation are particularly convincing when epidemiological evidence can support the theory that a particular exposure is linked to the cancer and when the mutational process can be recapitulated in experimental systems. In this review, I will summarize recent evidence from cancer genome sequencing studies to exemplify how the environment can modulate tumor genomes. RECENT FINDINGS: Mutation data from cancer genomes clearly implicate the ultraviolet B component of sunlight in melanoma skin cancers, tobacco carcinogen-induced DNA damage in lung cancers and aristolochic acid, a chemical compound found in certain herbal medicines, in urothelial carcinomas of exposed populations. However, large-scale sequencing is beginning to unveil other unique mutational spectra in particular cancers, such as A-to-C mutations at 5'AA dinucleotides in esophageal adenocarcinomas and complex mutational patterns in liver cancer. These datasets can form the basis for future studies aimed at identifying the carcinogens at work. SUMMARY: The findings have substantial implications for our understanding of cancer causation and cancer prevention.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The mutational patterns of cancer genomes allow conclusions or generation of hypotheses as to what mechanisms or environmental, dietary or occupational exposures might have created the mutations and therefore will have contributed to the formation of the cancer. The arguments for cancer causation are particularly convincing when epidemiological evidence can support the theory that a particular exposure is linked to the cancer and when the mutational process can be recapitulated in experimental systems. In this review, I will summarize recent evidence from cancer genome sequencing studies to exemplify how the environment can modulate tumor genomes. RECENT FINDINGS: Mutation data from cancer genomes clearly implicate the ultraviolet B component of sunlight in melanoma skin cancers, tobacco carcinogen-induced DNA damage in lung cancers and aristolochic acid, a chemical compound found in certain herbal medicines, in urothelial carcinomas of exposed populations. However, large-scale sequencing is beginning to unveil other unique mutational spectra in particular cancers, such as A-to-C mutations at 5'AA dinucleotides in esophageal adenocarcinomas and complex mutational patterns in liver cancer. These datasets can form the basis for future studies aimed at identifying the carcinogens at work. SUMMARY: The findings have substantial implications for our understanding of cancer causation and cancer prevention.
Authors: Nishant Agrawal; Yuchen Jiao; Chetan Bettegowda; Susan M Hutfless; Yuxuan Wang; Stefan David; Yulan Cheng; William S Twaddell; Nyan L Latt; Eun J Shin; Li-Dong Wang; Liang Wang; Wancai Yang; Victor E Velculescu; Bert Vogelstein; Nickolas Papadopoulos; Kenneth W Kinzler; Stephen J Meltzer Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2012-08-09 Impact factor: 39.397
Authors: Sergey I Nikolaev; Donata Rimoldi; Christian Iseli; Armand Valsesia; Daniel Robyr; Corinne Gehrig; Keith Harshman; Michel Guipponi; Olesya Bukach; Vincent Zoete; Olivier Michielin; Katja Muehlethaler; Daniel Speiser; Jacques S Beckmann; Ioannis Xenarios; Thanos D Halazonetis; C Victor Jongeneel; Brian J Stevenson; Stylianos E Antonarakis Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2011-12-25 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Erin D Pleasance; R Keira Cheetham; Philip J Stephens; David J McBride; Sean J Humphray; Chris D Greenman; Ignacio Varela; Meng-Lay Lin; Gonzalo R Ordóñez; Graham R Bignell; Kai Ye; Julie Alipaz; Markus J Bauer; David Beare; Adam Butler; Richard J Carter; Lina Chen; Anthony J Cox; Sarah Edkins; Paula I Kokko-Gonzales; Niall A Gormley; Russell J Grocock; Christian D Haudenschild; Matthew M Hims; Terena James; Mingming Jia; Zoya Kingsbury; Catherine Leroy; John Marshall; Andrew Menzies; Laura J Mudie; Zemin Ning; Tom Royce; Ole B Schulz-Trieglaff; Anastassia Spiridou; Lucy A Stebbings; Lukasz Szajkowski; Jon Teague; David Williamson; Lynda Chin; Mark T Ross; Peter J Campbell; David R Bentley; P Andrew Futreal; Michael R Stratton Journal: Nature Date: 2009-12-16 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Marcin Imielinski; Alice H Berger; Peter S Hammerman; Bryan Hernandez; Trevor J Pugh; Eran Hodis; Jeonghee Cho; James Suh; Marzia Capelletti; Andrey Sivachenko; Carrie Sougnez; Daniel Auclair; Michael S Lawrence; Petar Stojanov; Kristian Cibulskis; Kyusam Choi; Luc de Waal; Tanaz Sharifnia; Angela Brooks; Heidi Greulich; Shantanu Banerji; Thomas Zander; Danila Seidel; Frauke Leenders; Sascha Ansén; Corinna Ludwig; Walburga Engel-Riedel; Erich Stoelben; Jürgen Wolf; Chandra Goparju; Kristin Thompson; Wendy Winckler; David Kwiatkowski; Bruce E Johnson; Pasi A Jänne; Vincent A Miller; William Pao; William D Travis; Harvey I Pass; Stacey B Gabriel; Eric S Lander; Roman K Thomas; Levi A Garraway; Gad Getz; Matthew Meyerson Journal: Cell Date: 2012-09-14 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Igor B Rogozin; Alexander Goncearenco; Artem G Lada; Subhajyoti De; Vyacheslav Yurchenko; German Nudelman; Anna R Panchenko; David N Cooper; Youri I Pavlov Journal: Cell Cycle Date: 2018-02-15 Impact factor: 4.534