Literature DB >> 25402969

Biosensor Regeneration: A Review of Common Techniques and Outcomes.

J A Goode1,2, J V H Rushworth1,3, P A Millner1.   

Abstract

Biosensors are ideally portable, low-cost tools for the rapid detection of pathogens, proteins, and other analytes. The global biosensor market is currently worth over 10 billion dollars annually and is a burgeoning field of interdisciplinary research that is hailed as a potential revolution in consumer, healthcare, and industrial testing. A key barrier to the widespread adoption of biosensors, however, is their cost. Although many systems have been validated in the laboratory setting and biosensors for a range of analytes are proven at the concept level, many have yet to make a strong commercial case for their acceptance. Though it is true with the development of cheaper electrodes, circuits, and components that there is a downward pressure on costs, there is also an emerging trend toward the development of multianalyte biosensors that is pushing in the other direction. One way to reduce the cost that is suitable for certain systems is to enable their reuse, thus reducing the cost per test. Regenerating biosensors is a technique that can often be used in conjunction with existing systems in order to reduce costs and accelerate the commercialization process. This article discusses the merits and drawbacks of regeneration schemes that have been proven in various biosensor systems and indicates parameters for successful regeneration based on a systematic review of the literature. It also outlines some of the difficulties encountered when considering the role of regeneration at the point of use. A brief meta-analysis has been included in this review to develop a working definition for biosensor regeneration, and using this analysis only ∼60% of the reported studies analyzed were deemed a success. This highlights the variation within the field and the need to normalize regeneration as a standard process across the field by establishing a consensus term.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25402969     DOI: 10.1021/la503533g

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langmuir        ISSN: 0743-7463            Impact factor:   3.882


  43 in total

1.  Monitoring of Microphysiological Systems: Integrating Sensors and Real-Time Data Analysis toward Autonomous Decision-Making.

Authors:  Ashlyn T Young; Kristina R Rivera; Patrick D Erb; Michael A Daniele
Journal:  ACS Sens       Date:  2019-04-19       Impact factor: 7.711

Review 2.  Guide to Selecting a Biorecognition Element for Biosensors.

Authors:  Marissa A Morales; Jeffrey Mark Halpern
Journal:  Bioconjug Chem       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 4.774

Review 3.  Microfluidic integration of regeneratable electrochemical affinity-based biosensors for continual monitoring of organ-on-a-chip devices.

Authors:  Julio Aleman; Tugba Kilic; Luis S Mille; Su Ryon Shin; Yu Shrike Zhang
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 4.  Electrochemical biosensors for pathogen detection.

Authors:  Ellen Cesewski; Blake N Johnson
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2020-04-12       Impact factor: 10.618

5.  Refreshable Nanobiosensor Based on Organosilica Encapsulation of Biorecognition Elements.

Authors:  Rohit Gupta; Jingyi Luan; Shantanu Chakrabartty; Erica L Scheller; Jeremiah Morrissey; Srikanth Singamaneni
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 9.229

6.  Cerium oxide-doped PEDOT nanocomposite for label-free electrochemical immunosensing of anti-p53 autoantibodies.

Authors:  Andrés F Cruz-Pacheco; Jennifer Quinchia; Jahir Orozco
Journal:  Mikrochim Acta       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 5.833

7.  Nanomaterials-Based Sensors for Respiratory Viral Detection: A Review.

Authors:  Gowhar A Naikoo; Tasbiha Awan; Israr Ul Hassan; Hiba Salim; Fareeha Arshad; Waqar Ahmed; Abdullah M Asiri; Ahsanulhaq Qurashi
Journal:  IEEE Sens J       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 4.325

Review 8.  Overcoming Major Barriers to Developing Successful Sensors for Practical Applications Using Functional Nucleic Acids.

Authors:  JingJing Zhang; Tian Lan; Yi Lu
Journal:  Annu Rev Anal Chem (Palo Alto Calif)       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 12.400

9.  Translating in vitro diagnostics from centralized laboratories to point-of-care locations using commercially-available handheld meters.

Authors:  JingJing Zhang; Tian Lan; Yi Lu
Journal:  Trends Analyt Chem       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 12.296

10.  A Complete Optical Sensor System Based on a POF-SPR Platform and a Thermo-Stabilized Flow Cell for Biochemical Applications.

Authors:  Nunzio Cennamo; Francesco Chiavaioli; Cosimo Trono; Sara Tombelli; Ambra Giannetti; Francesco Baldini; Luigi Zeni
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.