OBJECTIVE: This study examines key themes from narrative interviews conducted with 43 homeless adults with mental disorders 18 months after random assignment to Housing First with intensive supports or to treatment as usual (no housing or supports through the study). METHOD: Coding and thematic analysis of semistructured interviews was based on 2 research questions from participants' perspectives: (a) What changes were perceived over time? (b) What factors facilitated or hindered change? RESULTS: The majority of participants assigned to Housing First reported positive change across multiple domains as a result of stable housing; whereas the majority of treatment as usual participants reported negative or neutral change. Key themes included feelings of security and pride; adjusting to living alone; housing as a learning process; and developing meaningful activity. The sense of security associated with stable housing was the most influential factor that supported change. Factors that helped or hindered change clustered into 4 key themes: the type and quality of services; the cumulative effects of trauma; social ties; and concurrent substance use. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Our findings provide important context to the emerging body of quantitative research on Housing First and recovery from homelessness. Participants' experiences of recovery, particularly as it relates to housing and supports, shifts in identity, and meaningful activity must be acknowledged and incorporated into the design and evaluation of public services, and policy and service reforms. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).
OBJECTIVE: This study examines key themes from narrative interviews conducted with 43 homeless adults with mental disorders 18 months after random assignment to Housing First with intensive supports or to treatment as usual (no housing or supports through the study). METHOD: Coding and thematic analysis of semistructured interviews was based on 2 research questions from participants' perspectives: (a) What changes were perceived over time? (b) What factors facilitated or hindered change? RESULTS: The majority of participants assigned to Housing First reported positive change across multiple domains as a result of stable housing; whereas the majority of treatment as usual participants reported negative or neutral change. Key themes included feelings of security and pride; adjusting to living alone; housing as a learning process; and developing meaningful activity. The sense of security associated with stable housing was the most influential factor that supported change. Factors that helped or hindered change clustered into 4 key themes: the type and quality of services; the cumulative effects of trauma; social ties; and concurrent substance use. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Our findings provide important context to the emerging body of quantitative research on Housing First and recovery from homelessness. Participants' experiences of recovery, particularly as it relates to housing and supports, shifts in identity, and meaningful activity must be acknowledged and incorporated into the design and evaluation of public services, and policy and service reforms. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).
Authors: Anna S Pruitt; John P Barile; Terry Yasuko Ogawa; Nelson Peralta; Reumell Bugg; John Lau; Thomas Lamberton; Corazon Hall; Victor Mori Journal: Am J Community Psychol Date: 2018-01-11
Authors: Jorien van der Laan; Barbara van Straaten; Sandra N Boersma; Gerda Rodenburg; Dike van de Mheen; Judith R L M Wolf Journal: Int J Public Health Date: 2017-08-18 Impact factor: 3.380
Authors: Pauline Rhenter; Delphine Moreau; Christian Laval; Jean Mantovani; Amandine Albisson; Guillaume Suderie; Mohamed Boucekine; Aurelie Tinland; Sandrine Loubière; Tim Greacen; Pascal Auquier; Vincent Girard Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-03-14 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Maria Jennifer Estrella; Bonnie Kirsh; Pia Kontos; Alisa Grigorovich; Angela Colantonio; Vincy Chan; Emily Joan Nalder Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-11-20 Impact factor: 3.390