| Literature DB >> 25402277 |
Martin Tepel1, Christoffer Borst1, Claus Bistrup1, Niels Marcussen2, Nikolaos Pagonas3, Felix S Seibert3, Robert Arndt4, Walter Zidek4, Timm H Westhoff3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Current methods do not predict the acute renal allograft injury immediately after kidney transplantation. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of urinary calprotectin for predicting immediate posttransplant allograft injury.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25402277 PMCID: PMC4234472 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Clinical characteristics of 144 patients with renal allograft.
| Characteristic | All patients | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | P-value |
| Age of the donor | 52 | 51 | 56 | 51 | 52 | 0.13 |
| (years) | (45–59) | (45–57) | (49–66) | (46–57) | (43–67) | |
| Deceased kidney | 76 | 11 | 19 | 16 | 30 | <0.001 |
| (number (%)) | (53%) | (31%) | (53%) | (44%) | (83%) | |
| Cold-ischemia time | 600 | 398 | 754 | 415 | 607 | 0.26 |
| (min) | (290–840) | (163–840) | (293–914) | (166–664) | (447–798) | |
| HLA mismatches | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0.37 |
| (range, 0 to 6) | (2–4) | (2–4) | (3–4) | (2–4) | (2–4) | |
| Age of recipient | 52 | 52 | 53 | 50 | 53 | 0.18 |
| (years) | (45–59) | (40–61) | (39–61) | (42–58) | (48–65) | |
| Gender male, n (%) | 85 (59) | 22 (61) | 22 (61) | 19 (53) | 22 (61) | 0.86 |
| Duration of dialysis | 26 | 5 | 29 | 22 | 72 | <0.001 |
| (months) | (4–71) | (0–32) | (5–68) | (7–59) | (25–90) | |
| Body weight (kg) | 79 (66–89) | 74 (64–89) | 82 (69–91) | 79 (68–97) | 77 (65–89) | 0.36 |
| Body mass-index | 26 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 26 | 0.10 |
| (kg/m2) | (23–29) | (23–27) | (24–28) | (24–30) | (23–29) | |
| Systolic blood | 148 | 150 | 152 | 145 | 144 | 0.19 |
| pressure (mmHg) | (130–161) | (135–166) | (136–170) | (124–154) | (128–169) | |
| Diastolic blood | 84 | 85 | 87 | 80 | 80 | 0.75 |
| pressure (mmHg) | (76–94) | (76–97) | (78–92) | (75–97) | (71–94) |
Continuous data are presented as median (interquartile range). Data are shown for all patients and according to quartiles (Q) of urinary calprotectin concentrations (with Q1, less than 286 ng/mL; Q2, 286 to 576 ng/mL; Q3, 577 to 1694 ng/mL; Q4, more than 1694 ng/mL). Categorical data are presented as numbers (percent). Groups containing continuous data were compared using Kruskal-Wallis test, whereas groups containing categorical data were compared using Chi-squared test.
Figure 1Urinary calprotectin concentrations predict renal allograft function.
Box-and-whiskers-plots showing the reduction of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) four weeks (A), 6 months (B; n = 135), and 12 months (C; n = 123) after transplantation with increasing quartiles (Q) of urinary calprotectin concentrations. Boxes indicate median and interquartile ranges, whiskers indicate 5 to 95 percentile. Significant differences between the shown groups were **P<0.01 and *P<0.05 by Kruskal-Wallis test and Dunn’s multiple comparison test.
Figure 2Association of urinary calprotectin with estimated glomerular filtration rate.
A. Dot plot depicting the significant association of urinary calprotectin levels (log scale) with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) four weeks after transplantation. Spearman r = −0.33; P<0.001. B. Percentage of cases with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) after 4 weeks in the lowest quartile (i.e., less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m2) is shown. Bar graph shows percentages of cases from the contingency table, therefore there are no error bars. Chi-square derived from the contingency table was 17.10; P<0.001.
Figure 3Calprotectin predicts kidney function.
A. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves and summary data (Inset) for area under curve showing that urinary calprotectin concentrations predicted impaired kidney function 4 weeks after transplantation. All analyses were performed in the entire population. eGFR after 4 weeks in mL/min/1.73 m2 are indicated in the legend above the curves. The inset indicates each area under curve per eGFR curve. ***P<0.001. B. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves for urinary calprotectin and urinary kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1) concentrations for predicting the eGFR in the lowest quartile (i.e., less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m2) 1 month after renal transplantation. C. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves for urinary calprotectin and absolute change of plasma creatinine for predicting the eGFR in the lowest quartile (i.e., less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m2) 12 months after renal transplantation.
Univariate linear regression analyses for estimated glomerular filtration rate 4 weeks after kidney transplantation.
| Variable | B | SE of B | P | 95% CI of B |
| Urinary calprotectin | −8.391 | 2.432 | 0.001 | −13.201 to −3.580 |
| Donor age | −0.577 | 0.120 | <0.001 | −0.814 to −0.339 |
| Donor gender (0 = female; 1 = male) | 5.168 | 2.755 | 0.063 | −0.283 to 10.619 |
| Donor status (0 = LD; 1 = DD) | −3.308 | 3.493 | 0.345 | −10.219 to 3.603 |
| Recipient age | −0.040 | 0.117 | 0.735 | −0.271 to 0.192 |
| Recipient gender (0 = female; 1 = male) | 1.212 | 2.801 | 0.666 | −4.329 to 6.753 |
| Delayed graft function (0 = no DGF; 1 = DGF) | −5.638 | 3.409 | 0.101 | −12.382 to 1.106 |
| Duration of dialysis before transplantation (months) | −0.005 | 0.040 | 0.897 | −0.084 to 0.074 |
| Prednisolone (0 = no; 1 = yes) | 2.002 | 3.223 | 0.536 | −4.374 to 8.379 |
B indicates regression coefficient; SE indicates standard error; CI indicates confidence interval. Calprotectin was analyzed as a continuous variable. Regression analyses were performed after logarithmic transformation of urinary calprotectin concentrations.
LD indicates living donor; DD indicates deceased donor. DGF indicates delayed graft function.
Multivariate linear regression analyses for estimated glomerular filtration rate 4 weeks, 6 months and 12 months after kidney transplantation.
| Variable | B | SE of B | P | 95% CI of B |
| 4 weeks after transplantation | ||||
| Urinary calprotectin | −9.636 | 2.199 | <0.001 | −13.985 to −5.287 |
| Donor age | −0.571 | 0.115 | <0.001 | −0.797 to −0.344 |
| Delayed graft function | −5.925 | 2.839 | 0.039 | −11.539 to −0.312 |
| 6 months after transplantation | ||||
| Urinary calprotectin | −5.516 | 2.416 | 0.024 | −10.295 to −0.737 |
| Donor age | −0.808 | 0.127 | <0.001 | −1.058 to −0.557 |
| 12 months after transplantation | ||||
| Urinary calprotectin | −5.895 | 2.816 | 0.038 | −11.470 to −0.318 |
| Donor age | −0.735 | 0.148 | <0.001 | −1.027 to −0.443 |
B indicates regression coefficient; SE indicates standard error; CI indicates confidence interval. Calprotectin was analyzed as a continuous variable. Regression analyses were performed after logarithmic transformation of urinary calprotectin concentrations.
LD indicates living donor; DD indicates deceased donor. DGF indicates delayed graft function.