Literature DB >> 25401700

Relatives with opposite chromosome constitutions, rec(10)dup(10p)inv(10)(p15.1q26.12) and rec(10)dup(10q)inv(10)(p15.1q26.12), due to a familial pericentric inversion.

Zivile Ciuladaite1, Egle Preiksaitiene, Algirdas Utkus, Vaidutis Kučinskas.   

Abstract

Large pericentric inversions in chromosome 10 are rare chromosomal aberrations with only few cases of familial inheritance. Such chromosomal rearrangements may lead to production of unbalanced gametes. As a result of a recombination event in the inversion loop, 2 recombinants with duplicated and deficient chromosome segments, including the regions distal to the inversion, may be produced. We report on 2 relatives in a family with opposite terminal chromosomal rearrangements of chromosome 10, i.e. rec(10)dup(10p)inv(10) and rec(10)dup(10q)inv(10), due to familial pericentric inversion inv(10)(p15.1q26.12). Based on array-CGH results, we characterized the exact genomic regions involved and compared the clinical features of both patients with previous reports on similar pericentric inversions and regional differences within 10p and 10q. The fact that both products of recombination are viable indicates a potentially high recurrence risk of unbalanced offspring. This report of unbalanced rearrangements in chromosome 10 in 2 generations confirms the importance of screening for terminal imbalances in patients with idiopathic intellectual disability by molecular cytogenetic techniques such as FISH, MLPA or microarrays. It also underlines the necessity for FISH to define structural characteristics of such cryptic intrachromosomal rearrangements and the underlying cytogenetic mechanisms.
© 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25401700     DOI: 10.1159/000368863

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res        ISSN: 1424-8581            Impact factor:   1.636


  7 in total

1.  Phenotype comparison confirms ZMYND11 as a critical gene for 10p15.3 microdeletion syndrome.

Authors:  Birute Tumiene; Ž Čiuladaitė; E Preikšaitienė; R Mameniškienė; A Utkus; V Kučinskas
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Neurodevelopmental Impairment As the Main Phenotypic Hallmark Associated with the Translocation t(7;10)(7p22.3;q26.11).

Authors:  Mario Mastrangelo; Barbara Torres; Gloria De Vita; Marina Goldoni; Agnese De Giorgi; Laura Bernardini; Vincenzo Leuzzi
Journal:  J Pediatr Genet       Date:  2020-08-20

3.  Molecular cytogenetic analysis of partial monosomy 10p and trisomy 10q resulting from familial pericentric inversion (10): a first case report in Chinese population.

Authors:  Jianlong Zhuang; Chunnuan Chen; Rongfu Huang; Qi Luo; Yuying Jiang; Shuhong Zeng; Yuanbai Wang; Yingjun Xie
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 1.904

Review 4.  Mechanisms of structural chromosomal rearrangement formation.

Authors:  Bruna Burssed; Malú Zamariolli; Fernanda Teixeira Bellucco; Maria Isabel Melaragno
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 1.904

5.  Relationship Between P15 Gene Mutation and Formation and Metastasis of Malignant Osteosarcoma.

Authors:  ChangShui Yu; WenBo Wang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2016-02-27

6.  Identification of genetic causes of congenital neurodevelopmental disorders using genome wide molecular technologies.

Authors:  Eglė Preikšaitienė; Laima Ambrozaitytė; Živilė Maldžienė; Aušra Morkūnienė; Loreta Cimbalistienė; Tautvydas Rančelis; Algirdas Utkus; Vaidutis Kučinskas
Journal:  Acta Med Litu       Date:  2016

7.  Pericentric inversion of chromosome 6 and male fertility problems.

Authors:  Haitao Fan; Zhe Liu; Peng Zhan; Guoliang Jia
Journal:  Open Med (Wars)       Date:  2022-01-19
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.