Literature DB >> 25400462

Magnifying endoscopy of gastric epithelial dysplasia based on the morphologic characteristics.

Hwa Mi Kang1, Gwang Ha Kim1, Do Youn Park1, Hong Ryeol Cheong1, Dong Hoon Baek1, Bong Eun Lee1, Geun Am Song1.   

Abstract

AIM: To investigate the difference in magnifying endoscopic findings of gastric epithelial dysplasias (GEDs) according to the morphologic characteristics.
METHODS: This study included 46 GED lesions in 45 patients who underwent magnifying endoscopy using narrow band imaging (ME-NBI) before endoscopic resection. During ME-NBI, the microvascular and microsurface (MS) patterns and the presence of light blue crest (LBC) and white opaque substance were investigated. GEDs were categorized as adenomatous, foveolar, and hybrid types, and their mucin phenotype was evaluated.
RESULTS: Of the 46 lesions, 27 (59%) were categorized as adenomatous, 15 (32%) as hybrid, and the remaining 4 (9%) as foveolar. All adenomatous GEDs showed the round pit and/or tubular MS patterns, all foveolar GEDs showed the papillary pattern, and hybrid GEDs showed mixed patterns (P < 0.001). LBC was more frequently observed in adenomatous GEDs than in hybrid or foveolar GEDs (52%, 33%, 0%, respectively), although this difference was not significant (P = 0.127). The papillary MS pattern was associated with MUC5AC and MUC6 expression, and the round pit and/or tubular MS patterns were associated with CD10 expression.
CONCLUSION: The MS pattern in ME-NBI findings is useful for predicting the morphologic category and mucin phenotype of GEDs, and ME-NBI findings may guide decisions regarding GED treatment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dysplasia; Magnifying endoscopy; Mucin; Narrow band imaging; Stomach

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25400462      PMCID: PMC4229543          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i42.15771

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  32 in total

1.  Can magnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging be useful for low grade adenomas in preoperative biopsy specimens?

Authors:  Kazuhiro Miwa; Hisashi Doyama; Renma Ito; Hiroyoshi Nakanishi; Katsura Hirano; Satoko Inagaki; Kei Tominaga; Naohiro Yoshida; Kenichi Takemura; Shinya Yamada; Yoshibumi Kaneko; Kazuyoshi Katayanagi; Hiroshi Kurumaya; Toshihide Okada; Masakazu Yamagishi
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 7.370

2.  How is the VS (vessel plus surface) classification system applicable to magnifying narrow-band imaging examinations of gastric neoplasias initially diagnosed as low-grade adenomas?

Authors:  Kenshi Yao
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 7.370

3.  [Early detection of esophageal neoplasms by magnifying endoscopy].

Authors:  Miwako Arima
Journal:  Gan To Kagaku Ryoho       Date:  2011-09

4.  Mucin phenotype and narrow-band imaging with magnifying endoscopy for differentiated-type mucosal gastric cancer.

Authors:  Masaaki Kobayashi; Manabu Takeuchi; Yoichi Ajioka; Satoru Hashimoto; Akito Sato; Rintaro Narisawa; Yutaka Aoyagi
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-06-11       Impact factor: 7.527

5.  Usefulness of magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging for determining the horizontal extent of early gastric cancer when there is an unclear margin by chromoendoscopy (with video).

Authors:  Takashi Nagahama; Kenshi Yao; Shinichiro Maki; Motochika Yasaka; Yashuhiro Takaki; Toshiyuki Matsui; Hiroshi Tanabe; Akinori Iwashita; A Ota
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  A multicenter validation of an endoscopic classification with narrow band imaging for gastric precancerous and cancerous lesions.

Authors:  P Pimentel-Nunes; M Dinis-Ribeiro; J B Soares; R Marcos-Pinto; C Santos; C Rolanda; R P Bastos; M Areia; L Afonso; J Bergman; P Sharma; T Gotoda; R Henrique; L Moreira-Dias
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 10.093

7.  Magnifying narrowband imaging is more accurate than conventional white-light imaging in diagnosis of gastric mucosal cancer.

Authors:  Yasumasa Ezoe; Manabu Muto; Noriya Uedo; Hisashi Doyama; Kenshi Yao; Ichiro Oda; Kazuhiro Kaneko; Yoshiro Kawahara; Chizu Yokoi; Yasushi Sugiura; Hideki Ishikawa; Yoji Takeuchi; Yoshibumi Kaneko; Yutaka Saito
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Prospective study of the evaluation of the usefulness of tumor typing by narrow band imaging for the differential diagnosis of gastric adenoma and well-differentiated adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Kouichi Nonaka; Shin Arai; Shinichi Ban; Hideki Kitada; Masaaki Namoto; Koji Nagata; Yasutoshi Ochiai; Osamu Togawa; Masamitsu Nakao; Makoto Nishimura; Keiko Ishikawa; Yutaka Sasaki; Hiroto Kita
Journal:  Dig Endosc       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 7.559

9.  Nature of white opaque substance in gastric epithelial neoplasia as visualized by magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging.

Authors:  Kenshi Yao; Akinori Iwashita; Masami Nambu; Hiroshi Tanabe; Takashi Nagahama; Shinichiro Maki; Hideki Ishikawa; Toshiyuki Matsui; Munechika Enjoji
Journal:  Dig Endosc       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 7.559

10.  A new fully automatic and robust algorithm for fast segmentation of liver tissue and tumors from CT scans.

Authors:  Laurent Massoptier; Sergio Casciaro
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Efforts to increase image quality during endoscopy: The role of pronase.

Authors:  Gwang Ha Kim; Yu Kyung Cho; Jae Myung Cha; Sun-Young Lee; Il-Kwun Chung
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-03-10
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.