Literature DB >> 25400084

Evolution of insect wings and development - new details from Palaeozoic nymphs.

Joachim T Haug1, Carolin Haug1, Russell J Garwood2,3.   

Abstract

The nymphal stages of Palaeozoic insects differ significantly in morphology from those of their modern counterparts. Morphological details for some previously reported species have recently been called into question. Palaeozoic insect nymphs are important, however - their study could provide key insights into the evolution of wings, and complete metamorphosis. Here we review past work on these topics and juvenile insects in the fossil record, and then present both novel and previously described nymphs, documented using new imaging methods. Our results demonstrate that some Carboniferous nymphs - those of Palaeodictyopteroidea - possessed movable wing pads and appear to have been able to perform simple flapping flight. It remains unclear whether this feature is ancestral for Pterygota or an autapomorphy of Palaeodictyopteroidea. Further characters of nymphal development which were probably in the ground pattern of Pterygota can be reconstructed. Wing development was very gradual (archimetaboly). Wing pads did not protrude from the tergum postero-laterally as in most modern nymphs, but laterally, and had well-developed venation. The modern orientation of wing pads and the delay of wing development into later developmental stages (condensation) appears to have evolved several times independently within Pterygota: in Ephemeroptera, Odonatoptera, Eumetabola, and probably several times within Polyneoptera. Selective pressure appears to have favoured a more pronounced metamorphosis between the last nymphal and adult stage, ultimately reducing exploitation competition between the two. We caution, however, that the results presented herein remain preliminary, and the reconstructed evolutionary scenario contains gaps and uncertainties. Additional comparative data need to be collected. The present study is thus seen as a starting point for this enterprise.
© 2014 Cambridge Philosophical Society.

Keywords:  fossils; insect development; nymphs; ontogeny; palaeo-evo-devo; palaeoentomology

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25400084     DOI: 10.1111/brv.12159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc        ISSN: 0006-3231


  9 in total

1.  Phanerozoic pO2 and the early evolution of terrestrial animals.

Authors:  Sandra R Schachat; Conrad C Labandeira; Matthew R Saltzman; Bradley D Cramer; Jonathan L Payne; C Kevin Boyce
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  The innovation of the final moult and the origin of insect metamorphosis.

Authors:  Xavier Belles
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  The presumed oldest flying insect: more likely a myriapod?

Authors:  Carolin Haug; Joachim T Haug
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 4.  What serial homologs can tell us about the origin of insect wings.

Authors:  Yoshinori Tomoyasu; Takahiro Ohde; Courtney Clark-Hachtel
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2017-03-14

5.  Beetle larvae with unusually large terminal ends and a fossil that beats them all (Scraptiidae, Coleoptera).

Authors:  Joachim T Haug; Carolin Haug
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Functional morphology of parasitic isopods: understanding morphological adaptations of attachment and feeding structures in Nerocila as a pre-requisite for reconstructing the evolution of Cymothoidae.

Authors:  Christina Nagler; Joachim T Haug
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  An exceptionally preserved 110 million years old praying mantis provides new insights into the predatory behaviour of early mantodeans.

Authors:  Marie K Hörnig; Joachim T Haug; Carolin Haug
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Looking into the puparium: Micro-CT visualization of the internal morphological changes during metamorphosis of the blow fly, Calliphora vicina, with the first quantitative analysis of organ development in cyclorrhaphous dipterans.

Authors:  Daniel Martín-Vega; Thomas J Simonsen; Martin J R Hall
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 1.804

9.  Gene content evolution in the arthropods.

Authors:  Gregg W C Thomas; Elias Dohmen; Daniel S T Hughes; Shwetha C Murali; Monica Poelchau; Karl Glastad; Clare A Anstead; Nadia A Ayoub; Phillip Batterham; Michelle Bellair; Greta J Binford; Hsu Chao; Yolanda H Chen; Christopher Childers; Huyen Dinh; Harsha Vardhan Doddapaneni; Jian J Duan; Shannon Dugan; Lauren A Esposito; Markus Friedrich; Jessica Garb; Robin B Gasser; Michael A D Goodisman; Dawn E Gundersen-Rindal; Yi Han; Alfred M Handler; Masatsugu Hatakeyama; Lars Hering; Wayne B Hunter; Panagiotis Ioannidis; Joy C Jayaseelan; Divya Kalra; Abderrahman Khila; Pasi K Korhonen; Carol Eunmi Lee; Sandra L Lee; Yiyuan Li; Amelia R I Lindsey; Georg Mayer; Alistair P McGregor; Duane D McKenna; Bernhard Misof; Mala Munidasa; Monica Munoz-Torres; Donna M Muzny; Oliver Niehuis; Nkechinyere Osuji-Lacy; Subba R Palli; Kristen A Panfilio; Matthias Pechmann; Trent Perry; Ralph S Peters; Helen C Poynton; Nikola-Michael Prpic; Jiaxin Qu; Dorith Rotenberg; Coby Schal; Sean D Schoville; Erin D Scully; Evette Skinner; Daniel B Sloan; Richard Stouthamer; Michael R Strand; Nikolaus U Szucsich; Asela Wijeratne; Neil D Young; Eduardo E Zattara; Joshua B Benoit; Evgeny M Zdobnov; Michael E Pfrender; Kevin J Hackett; John H Werren; Kim C Worley; Richard A Gibbs; Ariel D Chipman; Robert M Waterhouse; Erich Bornberg-Bauer; Matthew W Hahn; Stephen Richards
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 13.583

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.