CONCLUSION: Both the bithermal caloric test and the video-head impulse test (vHIT) were more often abnormal in Ménière's disease (MD) than in vestibular migraine (VM). Horizontal vestibulo-ocular reflex (hVOR) evaluation with caloric test (low-frequency test) was significantly more often abnormal than vHIT (high-frequency test). Therefore, both tests can be used in a complementary way for frequency-selective testing of peripheral vestibular function. OBJECTIVES: To compare the results of caloric testing and vHIT in MD and VM and to determine which test is more sensitive to uncover peripheral vestibular hypofunction. METHODS: Patients with MD (n=30) or VM (n=23) were examined with the caloric test and vHIT. The parameters analyzed were the canal paresis factor for the caloric test and the hVOR gain on both sides in vHIT. RESULTS: The caloric test was abnormal in 67% of patients with MD and in 22% with VM (p=0.002), while the vHIT showed an hVOR deficit in 37% in MD and 9% in VM (p=0.025). In all, 28% of patients with an abnormal caloric test had a normal vHIT, whereas 6% of those with an abnormal vHIT had a normal caloric test. The sensitivity of vHIT compared with caloric testing was 55% for MD and 40% for VM. Neither the caloric test nor vHIT could detect significant differences between early (<5 years) or advanced stages (>5 years) of MD or VM.
CONCLUSION: Both the bithermal caloric test and the video-head impulse test (vHIT) were more often abnormal in Ménière's disease (MD) than in vestibular migraine (VM). Horizontal vestibulo-ocular reflex (hVOR) evaluation with caloric test (low-frequency test) was significantly more often abnormal than vHIT (high-frequency test). Therefore, both tests can be used in a complementary way for frequency-selective testing of peripheral vestibular function. OBJECTIVES: To compare the results of caloric testing and vHIT in MD and VM and to determine which test is more sensitive to uncover peripheral vestibular hypofunction. METHODS:Patients with MD (n=30) or VM (n=23) were examined with the caloric test and vHIT. The parameters analyzed were the canal paresis factor for the caloric test and the hVOR gain on both sides in vHIT. RESULTS: The caloric test was abnormal in 67% of patients with MD and in 22% with VM (p=0.002), while the vHIT showed an hVOR deficit in 37% in MD and 9% in VM (p=0.025). In all, 28% of patients with an abnormal caloric test had a normal vHIT, whereas 6% of those with an abnormal vHIT had a normal caloric test. The sensitivity of vHIT compared with caloric testing was 55% for MD and 40% for VM. Neither the caloric test nor vHIT could detect significant differences between early (<5 years) or advanced stages (>5 years) of MD or VM.
Authors: Francesco Martines; Francesco Dispenza; Calogero Montalbano; Roberta Priola; Angelo Torrente; Rosario La Gumina; Filippo Brighina; Francesco Galletti; Pietro Salvago Journal: J Int Adv Otol Date: 2020-08 Impact factor: 1.017