| Literature DB >> 25399866 |
Chang Qian1, Wenhua You1, Dong Xie1, Dan Yu1.
Abstract
Asexual propagules are the dominant means of propagation in most submerged macrophytes. To improve the understanding of how water nutrient concentrations and population density influence the turion production of Potamogeton crispus L., the turions were planted in mesocosms with three water nutrient conditions (ambient lake water, high P and high N) and two plant density levels (4 and 15 turions m(-2)). After a 9-month experiment, the +P in the water column significantly increased the total turion number per plant under both of the plant density treatments. However, the +N in the water column did not affect the turion number per plant under low plant density. The +P in the water and high plant density significantly reduced the turion individual biomass. An examination of 3210 turion individuals from all treatments revealed that the increased water nutrient concentrations and plant density impacted the turion size by producing different stem diameters of individual turions. Most of the scale leaf morphological traits of the turions were significantly increased under higher water nutrients, but these traits were similar between the different plant density treatments. These results demonstrate that the water P concentration interacts with plant density, affecting both the production and traits of turions.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25399866 PMCID: PMC4233331 DOI: 10.1038/srep07079
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Schematic representation of the turion of P. crispus.
Figure 2The daily photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) and water temperature during the experimental period (260-day).
Figure 3Differences in the turion number per plant (A) and average turion biomass (B) between the water nutrient and plant density treatments. The data are presented as means ± SE (n = 3). The bars with different letters indicate significant differences among the treatments (P < 0.05, two-way ANOVA with Duncan's correction). The data were transformed using the log(x) function.
Figure 4Percentages of turion number classified with different scale leaf number under different water nutrient conditions and at different plant densities (high plant density: open symbols; low plant density: filled symbols).
The different symbols indicate the different water nutrient treatments ( Lake water, +P, and +N). All of the data were transformed using the log(x + 1) function.
A two-way ANOVA of the effects of water nutrient (N) and plant density (D) on ratio of turion number in P. crispus turions of different scale leaf numbers
| 3 scale leaves | 4 scale leaves | 5 scale leaves | 6 scale leaves | 7 scale leaves | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Source | |||||||||||
| 2, 17 | 1.054 | 0.379 | 7.187 | 0.564 | 0.583 | 2.919 | 0.093 | 4.115 | |||
| 1, 17 | 8.080 | 22.954 | 1.291 | 0.278 | 9.812 | 16.254 | |||||
| 2, 17 | 2.724 | 0.106 | 1.516 | 0.259 | 0.661 | 0.534 | 2.967 | 0.090 | 4.943 | ||
Note: Bold type is used for significant differences (P < 0.05). The data were transformed using the log(x + 1) function.
A two-way generalized linear model (GLM) of the effects of water nutrient (N) and plant density (D) on turion stem length, turion stem diameter, scale leaf length and scale leaf width in P. crispus turions with different scale leaf numbers
| Turion stem length | Turion stem diameter | Length of turion scale leaf | Width of turion scale leaf | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scale leaf number | Source | ||||||||||||
| N | 2, 820 | 0.362 | 0.696 | 2, 820 | 30.737 | 2, 820 | 0.398 | 0.672 | 2, 820 | 5.455 | |||
| D | 1, 820 | 6.435 | 1, 820 | 57.416 | 1, 820 | 2.015 | 0.156 | 1, 820 | 10.857 | ||||
| N × D | 2, 820 | 2.731 | 0.066 | 2, 820 | 26.219 | 2, 820 | 0.253 | 0.776 | 2, 820 | 2.361 | 0.095 | ||
| N | 2, 873 | 5.394 | 2, 873 | 19.750 | 2, 873 | 31.079 | 2, 873 | 17.299 | |||||
| D | 1, 873 | <0.001 | 0.986 | 1, 873 | 13.386 | 1, 873 | 15.649 | 1, 873 | 3.396 | 0.066 | |||
| N × D | 2, 873 | 2.521 | 0.081 | 2, 873 | 24.941 | 2, 873 | 7.964 | 2, 873 | 2.581 | 0.076 | |||
| N | 2, 851 | 3.524 | 2, 851 | 16.194 | 2, 851 | 11.521 | 2, 851 | 16.132 | |||||
| D | 1, 851 | 0.316 | 0.574 | 1, 851 | 49.776 | 1, 851 | 0.659 | 0.417 | 1, 851 | 0.008 | 0.929 | ||
| N × D | 2, 851 | 0.234 | 0.792 | 2, 851 | 23.967 | 2, 851 | 1.403 | 0.246 | 2, 851 | 2.151 | 0.117 | ||
| N | 2, 493 | 0.745 | 0.476 | 2, 493 | 4.804 | 2, 493 | 6.393 | 2, 493 | 8.027 | ||||
| D | 1, 493 | 0.042 | 0.839 | 1, 493 | 26.591 | 1, 493 | 0.414 | 0.520 | 1, 493 | 0.394 | 0.530 | ||
| N × D | 2, 493 | 1.467 | 0.232 | 2, 493 | 15.431 | 2, 493 | 1.197 | 0.303 | 2, 493 | 0.098 | 0.906 | ||
| N | 2, 143 | 0.914 | 0.403 | 2, 143 | 4.488 | 2, 143 | 5.767 | 2, 143 | 5.604 | ||||
| D | 1, 143 | 3.857 | 0.051 | 1, 143 | 31.064 | 1, 143 | 5.337 | 1, 143 | 5.401 | ||||
| N × D | 2, 143 | 5.163 | 2, 143 | 9.691 | 2, 143 | 3.836 | 2, 143 | 0.136 | 0.873 | ||||
Note: Bold type is used for significant differences (P < 0.05). The data were transformed using the log(x) function.