Literature DB >> 25399532

Biting disrupts integration to spur skull evolution in eels.

David C Collar1, Peter C Wainwright1, Michael E Alfaro2, Liam J Revell3, Rita S Mehta4.   

Abstract

The demand that anatomical structures work together to perform biological functions is thought to impose strong limits on morphological evolution. Breakthroughs in diversification can occur, however, when functional integration among structures is relaxed. Although such transitions are expected to generate variation in morphological diversification across the tree of life, empirical tests of this hypothesis are rare. Here we show that transitions between suction-based and biting modes of prey capture, which require different degrees of coordination among skull components, are associated with shifts in the pattern of skull diversification in eels (Anguilliformes). Biting eels have experienced greater independence of the jaws, hyoid and operculum during evolution and exhibit more varied morphologies than closely related suction feeders, and this pattern reflects the weakened functional integration among skull components required for biting. Our results suggest that behavioural transitions can change the evolutionary potential of the vertebrate skeleton by altering functional relationships among structures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25399532     DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6505

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Commun        ISSN: 2041-1723            Impact factor:   14.919


  14 in total

1.  Replicated divergence in cichlid radiations mirrors a major vertebrate innovation.

Authors:  Matthew D McGee; Brant C Faircloth; Samuel R Borstein; Jimmy Zheng; C Darrin Hulsey; Peter C Wainwright; Michael E Alfaro
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Always chew your food: freshwater stingrays use mastication to process tough insect prey.

Authors:  Matthew A Kolmann; Kenneth C Welch; Adam P Summers; Nathan R Lovejoy
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Measuring the magnitude of morphological integration: The effect of differences in morphometric representations and the inclusion of size.

Authors:  Fabio A Machado; Alex Hubbe; Diogo Melo; Arthur Porto; Gabriel Marroig
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Extreme and rapid bursts of functional adaptations shape bite force in amniotes.

Authors:  Manabu Sakamoto; Marcello Ruta; Chris Venditti
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Evolution in an extreme environment: developmental biases and phenotypic integration in the adaptive radiation of antarctic notothenioids.

Authors:  Yinan Hu; Laura Ghigliotti; Marino Vacchi; Eva Pisano; H William Detrich; R Craig Albertson
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 3.260

6.  Why the short face? Developmental disintegration of the neurocranium drives convergent evolution in neotropical electric fishes.

Authors:  Kory M Evans; Brandon Waltz; Victor Tagliacollo; Prosanta Chakrabarty; James S Albert
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Strong biomechanical relationships bias the tempo and mode of morphological evolution.

Authors:  Martha M Muñoz; Y Hu; Philip S L Anderson; S N Patek
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  The Evolutionary Dynamics of Mechanically Complex Systems.

Authors:  Martha M Muñoz
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 3.326

9.  Do Developmental Constraints and High Integration Limit the Evolution of the Marsupial Oral Apparatus?

Authors:  Anjali Goswami; Marcela Randau; P David Polly; Vera Weisbecker; C Verity Bennett; Lionel Hautier; Marcelo R Sánchez-Villagra
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 3.326

10.  Modularity promotes morphological divergence in ray-finned fishes.

Authors:  Olivier Larouche; Miriam L Zelditch; Richard Cloutier
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.