Literature DB >> 25399276

Association between use of β-blockers and outcomes in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.

Lars H Lund1, Lina Benson2, Ulf Dahlström3, Magnus Edner4, Leif Friberg5.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF) may be as common and may have similar mortality as heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFREF). β-Blockers reduce mortality in HFREF but are inadequately studied in HFPEF.
OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that β-blockers are associated with reduced all-cause mortality in HFPEF.
DESIGN: Propensity score-matched cohort study using the Swedish Heart Failure Registry. Propensity scores for β-blocker use were derived from 52 baseline clinical and socioeconomic variables.
SETTING: Nationwide registry of 67 hospitals with inpatient and outpatient units and 95 outpatient primary care clinics in Sweden with patients entered into the registry between July 1, 2005, and December 30, 2012, and followed up until December 31, 2012. PARTICIPANTS: From a consecutive sample of 41,976 patients, 19,083 patients with HFPEF (mean [SD] age, 76 [12] years; 46% women). Of these, 8244 were matched 2:1 based on age and propensity score for β-blocker use, yielding 5496 treated and 2748 untreated patients with HFPEF. Also we conducted a positive-control consistency analysis involving 22,893 patients with HFREF, of whom 6081 were matched yielding 4054 treated and 2027 untreated patients. EXPOSURES: β-Blockers prescribed at discharge from the hospital or during an outpatient visit, analyzed 2 ways: without consideration of crossover and per-protocol analysis with censoring at crossover, if applicable. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The prespecified primary outcome was all-cause mortality and the secondary outcome was combined all-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalization.
RESULTS: Median follow-up in HFPEF was 755 days, overall; 709 days in the matched cohort; no patients were lost to follow-up. In the matched HFPEF cohort, 1-year survival was 80% vs 79% for treated vs untreated patients, and 5-year survival was 45% vs 42%, with 2279 (41%) vs 1244 (45%) total deaths and 177 vs 191 deaths per 1000 patient-years (hazard ratio [HR], 0.93; 95% CI, 0.86-0.996; P = .04). β-Blockers were not associated with reduced combined mortality or heart failure hospitalizations: 3368 (61%) vs 1753 (64%) total for first events, with 371 vs 378 first events per 1000 patient-years (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.92-1.04; P = .46). In the matched HFREF cohort, β-blockers were associated with reduced mortality (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.82-0.97, P=.005) and also with reduced combined mortality or heart failure hospitalization (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.84-0.95; P = .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In patients with HFPEF, use of β-blockers was associated with lower all-cause mortality but not with combined all-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalization. β-Blockers in HFPEF should be examined in a large randomized clinical trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25399276     DOI: 10.1001/jama.2014.15241

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  43 in total

1.  Heart failure in Tanzania and Sweden: Comparative characterization and prognosis in the Tanzania Heart Failure (TaHeF) study and the Swedish Heart Failure Registry (SwedeHF).

Authors:  Abel Makubi; Camilla Hage; Ulrik Sartipy; Johnson Lwakatare; Mohammed Janabi; Peter Kisenge; Ulf Dahlström; Lars Rydén; Julie Makani; Lars H Lund
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 4.164

2.  [New therapy concepts for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction].

Authors:  C Tschöpe; B Pieske
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.443

3.  Global Public Health Burden of Heart Failure.

Authors:  Gianluigi Savarese; Lars H Lund
Journal:  Card Fail Rev       Date:  2017-04

4.  Heart rate response and functional capacity in patients with chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Authors:  Eloy Domínguez; Patricia Palau; Eduardo Núñez; José María Ramón; Laura López; Joana Melero; Alejandro Bellver; Enrique Santas; Francisco J Chorro; Julio Núñez
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2018-03-24

Review 5.  Current Perspectives on Systemic Hypertension in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction.

Authors:  Marty C Tam; Ran Lee; Thomas M Cascino; Matthew C Konerman; Scott L Hummel
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 6.  Current Management and Future Directions of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: a Contemporary Review.

Authors:  Chayakrit Krittanawong; Marrick L Kukin
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-03-20

Review 7.  Challenging aspects of treatment strategies in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: "Why did recent clinical trials fail?".

Authors:  Peter Moritz Becher; Nina Fluschnik; Stefan Blankenberg; Dirk Westermann
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2015-09-26

Review 8.  The role of arterial hypertension in development heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: just a risk factor or something more?

Authors:  Marijana Tadic; Cesare Cuspidi; Athanasios Frydas; Guido Grassi
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 9.  Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: current management and future strategies : Expert opinion on the behalf of the Nucleus of the "Heart Failure Working Group" of the German Society of Cardiology (DKG).

Authors:  Carsten Tschöpe; Christoph Birner; Michael Böhm; Oliver Bruder; Stefan Frantz; Andreas Luchner; Lars Maier; Stefan Störk; Behrouz Kherad; Ulrich Laufs
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 10.  Heart Failure with Mid-range Ejection Fraction: Lessons from CHARM.

Authors:  Lars H Lund
Journal:  Card Fail Rev       Date:  2018-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.