Literature DB >> 25398959

The National Practice Benchmark for oncology, 2014 report on 2013 data.

Elaine L Towle1, Thomas R Barr2, James L Senese2.   

Abstract

The National Practice Benchmark (NPB) is a unique tool to measure oncology practices against others across the country in a way that allows meaningful comparisons despite differences in practice size or setting. In today's economic environment every oncology practice, regardless of business structure or affiliation, should be able to produce, monitor, and benchmark basic metrics to meet current business pressures for increased efficiency and efficacy of care. Although we recognize that the NPB survey results do not capture the experience of all oncology practices, practices that can and do participate demonstrate exceptional managerial capability, and this year those practices are recognized for their participation. In this report, we continue to emphasize the methodology introduced last year in which we reported medical revenue net of the cost of the drugs as net medical revenue for the hematology/oncology product line. The effect of this is to capture only the gross margin attributable to drugs as revenue. New this year, we introduce six measures of clinical data density and expand the radiation oncology benchmarks.
Copyright © 2014 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25398959     DOI: 10.1200/JOP.2014.001826

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oncol Pract        ISSN: 1554-7477            Impact factor:   3.840


  7 in total

1.  Diffusion of Bevacizumab Across Oncology Practices: An Observational Study.

Authors:  Nancy L Keating; Haiden A Huskamp; Deborah Schrag; John M McWilliams; Barbara J McNeil; Bruce E Landon; Michael E Chernew; Sharon-Lise T Normand
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Reform of the Buy-and-Bill System for Outpatient Chemotherapy Care Is Inevitable: Perspectives from an Economist, a Realpolitik, and an Oncologist.

Authors:  Blase Polite; Rena M Conti; Jeffery C Ward
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2015

3.  The National Practice Benchmark for Oncology: 2015 Report for 2014 Data.

Authors:  Carla Balch; John D Ogle; James L Senese
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 3.840

4.  Expanding the Scope of the National Practice Oncology Benchmark Would Be a Critical Source for Understanding Outpatient Oncology Practice Costs and Profits in a Time of Change.

Authors:  Rena M Conti
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 5.  A review of access to cancer facilities in Punjab, Pakistan.

Authors:  Muhammad Abbas Khokhar; Muhammad Mohsin Ali; Samrin Liaqat; Arif Moin; Hafiz Abubakar Sarwar; Muhammad Zeeshan Sarwar
Journal:  Cancer Rep (Hoboken)       Date:  2020-04-20

Review 6.  Cure at what (systemic) financial cost? Integrating novel therapies into first-line Hodgkin lymphoma treatment.

Authors:  Scott F Huntington
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2019-12-06

7.  Clinicians Report Barriers and Facilitators to High-Quality Ambulatory Oncology Care.

Authors:  Megan Lafferty; Milisa Manojlovich; Jennifer J Griggs; Nathan Wright; Molly Harrod; Christopher R Friese
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2021 Sep-Oct 01       Impact factor: 2.592

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.