Literature DB >> 25398890

Ethnicity and differences between clinic and ambulatory blood pressure measurements.

Una Martin1, M Sayeed Haque2, Sally Wood3, Sheila M Greenfield2, Paramjit S Gill2, Jonathan Mant4, Mohammed A Mohammed5, Gurdip Heer2, Amanpreet Johal2, Ramendeep Kaur2, Claire Schwartz3, Richard J McManus4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the relationship of ethnicity to the differences between blood pressure (BP) measured in a clinic setting and by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in individuals with a previous diagnosis of hypertension (HT) and without a previous diagnosis of hypertension (NHT).
METHODS: A cross-sectional comparison of BP measurement was performed in 770 participants (white British (WB, 39%), South Asian (SA, 31%), and African Caribbean (AC, 30%)) in 28 primary care clinics in West Midlands, United Kingdom. Mean differences between daytime ABPM, standardized clinic (mean of 3 occasions), casual clinic (first reading on first occasion), and last routine BP taken at the general practitioner practice were compared in HT and NHT individuals.
RESULTS: Daytime systolic and diastolic ABPM readings were similar to standardized clinic BP (systolic: 128 (SE 0.9) vs. 125 (SE 0.9) mm Hg (NHT) and 132 (SE 0.7) vs. 131 (SE 0.7) mm Hg (HT)) and were not associated with ethnicity to a clinically important extent. When BP was taken less carefully, differences emerged: casual clinic readings were higher than ABPM, particularly in the HT group where the systolic differences approached clinical relevance (131 (SE 1.2) vs. 129 (SE 1.0) mm Hg (NHT) and 139 (SE 0.9) vs. 133 (SE 0.7) mm Hg (HT)) and were larger in SA and AC hypertensive individuals (136 (SE 1.5) vs. 133 (SE 1.2) mm Hg (WB), 141 (SE 1.7) vs. 133 (SE 1.4) mm Hg (SA), and 142 (SE 1.6) vs. 134 (SE 1.3) mm Hg (AC); mean differences: 3 (0-7), P = 0.03 and 4 (1-7), P = 0.01, respectively). Differences were also observed for the last practice reading in SA and ACs.
CONCLUSIONS: BP differences between ethnic groups where BP is carefully measured on multiple occasions are small and unlikely to alter clinical management. When BP is measured casually on a single occasion or in routine care, differences appear that could approach clinical relevance. © American Journal of Hypertension, Ltd 2014. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ambulatory blood pressure monitoring; blood pressure; blood pressure determination; ethnic group; hypertension; systolic pressure; white coat hypertension.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25398890     DOI: 10.1093/ajh/hpu211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hypertens        ISSN: 0895-7061            Impact factor:   2.689


  9 in total

1.  Prevalence and determinants of white coat effect in a large UK hypertension clinic population.

Authors:  O Thomas; K E Shipman; K Day; M Thomas; U Martin; I Dasgupta
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 3.012

2.  Health literacy and hypertension outcomes in a multi-ethnic population: the HELIUS study.

Authors:  R Miranda; K A C Meeks; M B Snijder; B J van den Born; M P Fransen; R J Peters; K Stronks; C Agyemang
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.367

3.  Noise annoyance predicts symptoms of depression, anxiety and sleep disturbance 5 years later. Findings from the Gutenberg Health Study.

Authors:  Manfred E Beutel; Elmar Brähler; Mareike Ernst; Eva Klein; Iris Reiner; Jörg Wiltink; Matthias Michal; Philipp S Wild; Andreas Schulz; Thomas Münzel; Omar Hahad; Jochem König; Karl J Lackner; Norbert Pfeiffer; Ana N Tibubos
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.367

4.  Association between high serum Nogo-B and hypertension in Chinese Han.

Authors:  Shunuo Li; Jianmeng Zheng; Xiaoxia Dong; Shasha Bi; Liqin Duan; Wei Zheng; Peishi Yan
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 2.174

Review 5.  Predictors of the Home-Clinic Blood Pressure Difference: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  James P Sheppard; Ben Fletcher; Paramjit Gill; Una Martin; Nia Roberts; Richard J McManus
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 2.689

6.  Measurement of blood pressure for the diagnosis and management of hypertension in different ethnic groups: one size fits all.

Authors:  Paramjit Gill; M Sayeed Haque; Una Martin; Jonathan Mant; Mohammed A Mohammed; Gurdip Heer; Amanpreet Johal; Ramandeep Kaur; Claire Schwartz; Sally Wood; Sheila M Greenfield; Richard J McManus
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 2.298

7.  Predicting Out-of-Office Blood Pressure in the Clinic (PROOF-BP): Derivation and Validation of a Tool to Improve the Accuracy of Blood Pressure Measurement in Clinical Practice.

Authors:  James P Sheppard; Richard Stevens; Paramjit Gill; Una Martin; Marshall Godwin; Janet Hanley; Carl Heneghan; F D Richard Hobbs; Jonathan Mant; Brian McKinstry; Martin Myers; David Nunan; Alison Ward; Bryan Williams; Richard J McManus
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 10.190

8.  Influence of ethnicity on acceptability of method of blood pressure monitoring: a cross-sectional study in primary care.

Authors:  Sally Wood; Sheila M Greenfield; M Sayeed Haque; Una Martin; Paramjit S Gill; Jonathan Mant; Mohammed A Mohammed; Gurdip Heer; Amanpreet Johal; Ramandeep Kaur; Claire Schwartz; Richard J McManus
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Prevalence and Clinical Correlates of White Coat Effect in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease and the Role of Automated Blood Pressure Device in its Assessment.

Authors:  Srinivas Shenoy; Shankar Prasad Nagaraju; Nileshwar R Rau; Ravindra A Prabhu; Uday Venkat Mateti; Dharshan Rangaswamy; Indu R Rao; Karan Saraf
Journal:  Indian J Nephrol       Date:  2018 Nov-Dec
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.