Literature DB >> 25398623

Exploring the response shift effect on the quality of life of patients with schizophrenia: an application of the random forest method.

Mohamed Boucekine1, Laurent Boyer1, Karine Baumstarck1, Aurelie Millier2, Badih Ghattas1, Pascal Auquier1, Mondher Toumi2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Interpretation of quality of life (QoL) scores over time can be difficult because of possible changes in internal standards, values, and conceptualization of QoL by individuals. This effect is called a response shift (RS). The purpose of this study was to examine whether an RS effect occurred over a 24-mo period in patients who were suffering from schizophrenia.
METHODS: The random forest method was applied to detect any RS reprioritization in a multicenter cohort study. QoL was recorded using a generic questionnaire (SF36) at baseline (T0), 12 mo (T12), and 24 mo (T24). Patients were categorized into 3 groups based on psychotic symptoms and relapse (stable, improved, and worsened groups) from their clinical profiles. The random forest method was performed to predict the General Health score of the SF36 from the other QoL domain scores of the SF36. We estimated the average variable importance of the QoL domain for each of the 3 groups.
RESULTS: A total of 124 (53.2%) patients were defined as stable, 59 (25.3%) as improved, and 50 (21.5%) as worsened. Among the stable group, the Social Functioning domain became more important over time. Of those classified as improved, the Mental Health domain became more important over time, while the Vitality domain became less important. Among those in the group who worsened, the Mental Health domain became less important while the Vitality and Bodily Pain domains became more important.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study identified differential RS reprioritization among patients with different clinical profiles. Further work is needed to determine whether RS should be interpreted as a measurement bias or as an effect integrated in a true change.
© The Author(s) 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SF36; longitudinal study; quality of life; random forest; reprioritization; response shift; schizophrenia

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25398623     DOI: 10.1177/0272989X14559273

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  8 in total

1.  Changes in quality of life from a homelessness intervention: true change, response shift, or random variation.

Authors:  Guido Antonio Powell; Carol E Adair; David L Streiner; Nancy Mayo; Eric Latimer
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 2.  If it's information, it's not "bias": a scoping review and proposed nomenclature for future response-shift research.

Authors:  Carolyn E Schwartz; Gudrun Rohde; Elijah Biletch; Richard B B Stuart; I-Chan Huang; Joseph Lipscomb; Roland B Stark; Richard L Skolasky
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Using classification and regression tree modelling to investigate response shift patterns in dentine hypersensitivity.

Authors:  Carolina Machuca; Mario V Vettore; Marta Krasuska; Sarah R Baker; Peter G Robinson
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 4.615

4.  Testing for response shift in treatment evaluation of change in self-reported psychopathology amongst secondary psychiatric care outpatients.

Authors:  Ingrid V E Carlier; Wessel A van Eeden; Kim de Jong; Erik J Giltay; Martijn S van Noorden; Christina van der Feltz-Cornelis; Frans G Zitman; Henk Kelderman; Albert M van Hemert
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 4.035

5.  Housing First for homeless people with severe mental illness: extended 4-year follow-up and analysis of recovery and housing stability from the randomized Un Chez Soi d'Abord trial.

Authors:  S Loubière; C Lemoine; M Boucekine; L Boyer; V Girard; A Tinland; P Auquier
Journal:  Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 6.892

6.  Subjectively different but objectively the same? Three profiles of QoL in people with severe mental health problems.

Authors:  David C Buitenweg; Ilja L Bongers; Dike van de Mheen; Hans A M van Oers; Chijs van Nieuwenhuizen
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Critical examination of current response shift methods and proposal for advancing new methods.

Authors:  Véronique Sébille; Lisa M Lix; Olawale F Ayilara; Tolulope T Sajobi; A Cecile J W Janssens; Richard Sawatzky; Mirjam A G Sprangers; Mathilde G E Verdam
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Response shift in results of patient-reported outcome measures: a commentary to The Response Shift-in Sync Working Group initiative.

Authors:  Mirjam A G Sprangers; Tolulope Sajobi; Antoine Vanier; Nancy E Mayo; Richard Sawatzky; Lisa M Lix; Frans J Oort; Véronique Sébille
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 4.147

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.