BACKGROUND: Interpretation of quality of life (QoL) scores over time can be difficult because of possible changes in internal standards, values, and conceptualization of QoL by individuals. This effect is called a response shift (RS). The purpose of this study was to examine whether an RS effect occurred over a 24-mo period in patients who were suffering from schizophrenia. METHODS: The random forest method was applied to detect any RS reprioritization in a multicenter cohort study. QoL was recorded using a generic questionnaire (SF36) at baseline (T0), 12 mo (T12), and 24 mo (T24). Patients were categorized into 3 groups based on psychotic symptoms and relapse (stable, improved, and worsened groups) from their clinical profiles. The random forest method was performed to predict the General Health score of the SF36 from the other QoL domain scores of the SF36. We estimated the average variable importance of the QoL domain for each of the 3 groups. RESULTS: A total of 124 (53.2%) patients were defined as stable, 59 (25.3%) as improved, and 50 (21.5%) as worsened. Among the stable group, the Social Functioning domain became more important over time. Of those classified as improved, the Mental Health domain became more important over time, while the Vitality domain became less important. Among those in the group who worsened, the Mental Health domain became less important while the Vitality and Bodily Pain domains became more important. CONCLUSIONS: Our study identified differential RS reprioritization among patients with different clinical profiles. Further work is needed to determine whether RS should be interpreted as a measurement bias or as an effect integrated in a true change.
BACKGROUND: Interpretation of quality of life (QoL) scores over time can be difficult because of possible changes in internal standards, values, and conceptualization of QoL by individuals. This effect is called a response shift (RS). The purpose of this study was to examine whether an RS effect occurred over a 24-mo period in patients who were suffering from schizophrenia. METHODS: The random forest method was applied to detect any RS reprioritization in a multicenter cohort study. QoL was recorded using a generic questionnaire (SF36) at baseline (T0), 12 mo (T12), and 24 mo (T24). Patients were categorized into 3 groups based on psychotic symptoms and relapse (stable, improved, and worsened groups) from their clinical profiles. The random forest method was performed to predict the General Health score of the SF36 from the other QoL domain scores of the SF36. We estimated the average variable importance of the QoL domain for each of the 3 groups. RESULTS: A total of 124 (53.2%) patients were defined as stable, 59 (25.3%) as improved, and 50 (21.5%) as worsened. Among the stable group, the Social Functioning domain became more important over time. Of those classified as improved, the Mental Health domain became more important over time, while the Vitality domain became less important. Among those in the group who worsened, the Mental Health domain became less important while the Vitality and Bodily Pain domains became more important. CONCLUSIONS: Our study identified differential RS reprioritization among patients with different clinical profiles. Further work is needed to determine whether RS should be interpreted as a measurement bias or as an effect integrated in a true change.
Authors: Carolyn E Schwartz; Gudrun Rohde; Elijah Biletch; Richard B B Stuart; I-Chan Huang; Joseph Lipscomb; Roland B Stark; Richard L Skolasky Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2021-10-27 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Carolina Machuca; Mario V Vettore; Marta Krasuska; Sarah R Baker; Peter G Robinson Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2017-08-14 Impact factor: 4.615
Authors: Ingrid V E Carlier; Wessel A van Eeden; Kim de Jong; Erik J Giltay; Martijn S van Noorden; Christina van der Feltz-Cornelis; Frans G Zitman; Henk Kelderman; Albert M van Hemert Journal: Int J Methods Psychiatr Res Date: 2019-06-17 Impact factor: 4.035
Authors: S Loubière; C Lemoine; M Boucekine; L Boyer; V Girard; A Tinland; P Auquier Journal: Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci Date: 2022-02-07 Impact factor: 6.892
Authors: David C Buitenweg; Ilja L Bongers; Dike van de Mheen; Hans A M van Oers; Chijs van Nieuwenhuizen Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2018-08-13 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Véronique Sébille; Lisa M Lix; Olawale F Ayilara; Tolulope T Sajobi; A Cecile J W Janssens; Richard Sawatzky; Mirjam A G Sprangers; Mathilde G E Verdam Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2021-02-17 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Mirjam A G Sprangers; Tolulope Sajobi; Antoine Vanier; Nancy E Mayo; Richard Sawatzky; Lisa M Lix; Frans J Oort; Véronique Sébille Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2021-01-22 Impact factor: 4.147