Literature DB >> 25398590

Fibrin-sealant-delivered cisplatin chemotherapy versus cisplatin hyperthermic intraperitoneal perfusion chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer without peritoneal metastases: a randomized phase-II clinical trial with a 40-month follow-up.

Ou Huang1, XiangHong Lu, XiangDong Xu, Yong Shi.   

Abstract

A new intraoperative cisplatin administration method for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (AGC) and without peritoneal metastasis, fibrin-sealant-delivered cisplatin chemotherapy, was reported, and its safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy were compared with cisplatin hyperthermic intraperitoneal perfusion chemotherapy. Forty-two AGC patients were randomly divided into 2 groups: fibrin-sealant-delivered cisplatin chemotherapy (FS) (n = 21) and cisplatin hyperthermic intraperitoneal perfusion chemotherapy (CHIC) (n = 21). Both groups received 120 mg cisplatin after complete cytoreductive surgery. At different time points, cisplatin concentrations in patients' sera and urine samples were measured to determine time-dependent maximal concentration (Cmax) and the area under the curve (AUC). The primary and secondary end-points were overall survival (OS) and safety profiling, respectively. Occurrence of grade-3 to grade-4 liver or kidney dysfunction was less frequent in the FS group than in the CHIC group (28.6 % vs 47.6 %). Cisplatin Cmax and AUC for the serum and urine of the FS patients were significantly lower than that of the CHIC patients. Elimination half-life of cisplatin in the FS group was significantly longer than in the CHIC group (24.1 h vs 14.2 h). After a median follow-up of 40 months, 1-, 2-, and 3-years OS were 90.5 %, 71.4 %, and 61.9 % in the FS group, and 61.9 %, 47.6 %, and 42.8 % in the CHIC group, respectively. The median OS was 35.9 months in the FS group and 29.1 months in the CHIC group. Fibrin-sealant-delivered cisplatin chemotherapy was as effective and had a favorable pharmacokinetic profile with similar survival outcomes as cisplatin hyperthermic intraperitoneal perfusion chemotherapy following complete cytoreductive surgery of locally advanced GC without peritoneal metastases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25398590     DOI: 10.1007/s12013-014-0326-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Biochem Biophys        ISSN: 1085-9195            Impact factor:   2.194


  4 in total

Review 1.  The 30-year experience-A meta-analysis of randomised and high-quality non-randomised studies of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the treatment of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Jacopo Desiderio; Joseph Chao; Laleh Melstrom; Susanne Warner; Federico Tozzi; Yuman Fong; Amilcare Parisi; Yanghee Woo
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 2.  Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) Combined with Surgery: A 12-Year Meta-Analysis of this Promising Treatment Strategy for Advanced Gastric Cancer at Different Stages.

Authors:  Jian-Feng Zhang; Ling Lv; Shuai Zhao; Qian Zhou; Cheng-Gang Jiang
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Efficacy and safety of intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer: a cumulative meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Zheng He; Ting-Ting Zhao; Hui-Mian Xu; Zhen-Ning Wang; Ying-Ying Xu; Yong-Xi Song; Zhong-Ran Ni; Hao Xu; Song-Cheng Yin; Xing-Yu Liu; Zhi-Feng Miao
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-09-11

4.  Prophylactic chemotherapeutic hyperthermic intraperitoneal perfusion reduces peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer: a retrospective clinical study.

Authors:  Lucheng Zhu; Zhizheng Xu; Yajun Wu; Pengyuan Liu; Jianing Qian; Shuhuan Yu; Bing Xia; Jianjun Lai; Shenglin Ma; Zhibing Wu
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 4.430

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.