Literature DB >> 2539695

Nontranslated cellular mRNAs are associated with the cytoskeletal framework in influenza virus or adenovirus infected cells.

M G Katze1, J Lara, M Wambach.   

Abstract

In an effort to understand the molecular mechanisms underlying the selective shutoff of host protein synthesis in influenza virus and adenovirus infected cells, we analyzed the subcellular location of representative cellular and viral mRNAs. Earlier work has shown that the majority of cellular mRNAs remain polysome associated after infection by either virus and that both the initiation and elongation steps of host protein synthesis were blocked in infected cells (M. G. Katze, D. DeCorato, and R. M. Krug, J. Virol., 60, 1027-1039, 1986). The present study was undertaken to test whether these cellular mRNAs were rendered nontranslatable during infection as a result of their dissociation from the cytoskeleton framework. HeLa cells were fractionated into subcellular components by first gently disrupting the cells with Triton X-100 yielding the soluble fraction (SOL); the cytoskeleton (CSK) fraction was obtained from the Triton insoluble material by the double detergent treatment of Tween-40 and sodium deoxycholate. In uninfected cells the majority of host mRNAs were associated with polysomes which were exclusively bound to the CSK as would be expected of actively translated mRNAs. The cellular mRNAs also remained almost totally associated with the cytoskeleton in adenovirus and influenza virus infected cells despite the fact that these mRNAs are not translated during infection. Indeed, the host mRNAs and the efficiently translated viral mRNAs were CSK associated to the same extent. In contrast to the adenovirus and influenza systems, significant amounts of cellular mRNAs were dissociated from the CSK and found in the SOL fraction of poliovirus infected cells as others have reported. In accordance with the biochemical analysis, morphological studies utilizing electron microscopy revealed that the cytoskeleton remained relatively intact during adenovirus and influenza infection but was substantially reorganized in poliovirus infected cells. We conclude that translational regulatory events are likely different in the poliovirus system and that cytoskeletal association of mRNAs may be required but is not sufficient for efficient mRNA translation during adenovirus or influenza virus infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2539695     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6822(89)90156-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Virology        ISSN: 0042-6822            Impact factor:   3.616


  8 in total

Review 1.  Translational control of viral gene expression in eukaryotes.

Authors:  M Gale; S L Tan; M G Katze
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 11.056

Review 2.  Interaction between mRNA, ribosomes and the cytoskeleton.

Authors:  J E Hesketh; I F Pryme
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1991-07-01       Impact factor: 3.857

3.  Monomeric scAlu and nascent dimeric Alu RNAs induced by adenovirus are assembled into SRP9/14-containing RNPs in HeLa cells.

Authors:  D Y Chang; K Hsu; R J Maraia
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1996-11-01       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  The mRNAs for cyclin A, c-myc and ribosomal proteins L4 and S6 are associated with cytoskeletal-bound polysomes in HepG2 cells.

Authors:  R Hovland; G Campbell; I Pryme; J Hesketh
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1995-08-15       Impact factor: 3.857

Review 5.  How does influenza virus regulate gene expression at the level of mRNA translation? Let us count the ways.

Authors:  M S Garfinkel; M G Katze
Journal:  Gene Expr       Date:  1993

Review 6.  Translation and the cytoskeleton: a mechanism for targeted protein synthesis.

Authors:  J Hesketh
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.316

7.  Poliovirus infection results in structural alteration of a microtubule-associated protein.

Authors:  M Joachims; D Etchison
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 5.103

8.  Fv-1 restriction and its effects on murine leukemia virus integration in vivo and in vitro.

Authors:  P M Pryciak; H E Varmus
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 5.103

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.