Literature DB >> 25396274

Device exchange in HeartMate II recipients: long-term outcomes and risk of thrombosis recurrence.

Allison P Levin1, Nir Uriel, Hiroo Takayama, Kanika P Mody, Takeyoshi Ota, Melana Yuzefpolskaya, Paolo C Colombo, Arthur R Garan, Marija Dionizovik-Dimanovski, Robert N Sladen, Yoshifumi Naka, Ulrich P Jorde.   

Abstract

Successful long-term use of the HeartMate II (HM II) left ventricular assist device has become commonplace but may be complicated by mechanical failure, infection, or thrombosis necessitating device exchange (DE). A subcostal approach to device exchange with motor exchange only is less traumatic, but long-term outcomes have not been reported. A retrospective chart review of all patients who required HM II to HM II device exchange at our institution was conducted. Of the 232 HM II patients implanted between January 2008 and July 2013, 28 required 36 device exchanges during a follow-up of 33.72 ± 17.25 months. The Kaplan-Meier 1 year survival was 63% for sternotomy exchanges and 100% for subcostal exchanges. Twenty-one exchanges were performed for initial or recurring device thrombosis. Although there was no difference in the risk of subsequent thrombosis after subcostal versus sternotomy exchange, the overall risk of recurring device thrombosis after device exchange for the same was high (31%). HM II device exchange via the subcostal approach has excellent short- and long-term outcomes. Device exchange performed for thrombosis is associated with a high recurrence risk irrespective of surgical approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25396274     DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ASAIO J        ISSN: 1058-2916            Impact factor:   2.872


  6 in total

Review 1.  New Challenges in the Treatment of Patients With Left Ventricular Support: LVAD Thrombosis.

Authors:  Ann B Nguyen; Nir Uriel; Sirtaz Adatya
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2016-12

2.  High-speed visualization of disturbed pathlines in axial flow ventricular assist device under pulsatile conditions.

Authors:  Fang Yang; Robert L Kormos; James F Antaki
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Heartmate 3 fully magnetically levitated left ventricular assist device for the treatment of advanced heart failure -1 year results from the Ce mark trial.

Authors:  Thomas Krabatsch; Ivan Netuka; Jan D Schmitto; Daniel Zimpfer; Jens Garbade; Vivek Rao; Michiel Morshuis; Friedhelm Beyersdorf; Silvana Marasco; Laura Damme; Yuriy Pya
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 1.637

4.  Minimally invasive approaches for implantation of left ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Dominik Wiedemann; Thomas Haberl; Philipp Angleitner; Kamen Dimitrov; Günther Laufer; Daniel Zimpfer
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-02-24

5.  Approaches to ventricular assist device exchange: Resternotomy versus limited incisions.

Authors:  Asishana A Osho; David A D'Alessandro
Journal:  JTCVS Tech       Date:  2022-01-17

6.  Left ventricular assist device exchange: the Toronto General Hospital experience.

Authors:  Hideki Tsubota; Roberto V P Ribeiro; Filio Billia; Robert J Cusimano; Terrence M Yau; Mitesh V Badiwala; William E Stansfield; Vivek Rao
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.089

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.