Literature DB >> 25396118

Identification of Biomarkers in Breast Cancer by Gene Expression Profiling Using Human Tissues.

Junjie Fu1, William Allen1, Amy Xia1, Zhuofan Ma1, Xin Qi1.   

Abstract

Breast cancer is the second leading cause of death by cancer in women. To identify biomarkers with potential diagnostic and therapeutic utilities in breast cancer, gene expression profiling from real patient tissues were used to discover significantly deregulated genes out of 50,739 genes of human transcriptome. Total RNAs were extracted, and the gene expression profiles of 32 cancerous and normal tissues were established using Agilent gene expression microarray technology. The results were analyzed with Agilent GeneSpring 12.6 software. Here we provide detailed experimental methods and analysis for the microarray data, which have been deposited into Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) under GSE57297.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 25396118      PMCID: PMC4226530          DOI: 10.1016/j.gdata.2014.09.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genom Data        ISSN: 2213-5960


Direct link to deposited data

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE57297

Experimental design, materials and methods

Tissue samples

Tissue samples were acquired from the Clinical and Translational Science Institute (CTSI) at University of Florida, covering three subtypes of breast cancer (Luminal A, Luminal B, Triple negative) [1], [2] as well as matched or unmatched normal tissue samples. All the human tissue samples were stored at − 80 °C before use.

RNA preparation

Total RNA was isolated and purified from frozen tissue samples using RNeasy Lipid Tissue Mini Kit and RNase-Free DNase Set (Qiagen, Chatsworth, CA) according to manufacturer's protocols. The quality of total RNA was strictly controlled by several parameters. The RNA extracts were first analyzed by Nanodrop 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) and gel electrophoresis. RNA quality was determined by the A260/A280 ratio (close to 2), A260/A230 (close to 2), and the presence of two distinct ribosomal bands on gel electrophoresis. Qualified RNAs were further tested using Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA), and samples with 28S/18S RNA ratio > 1 were selected for gene expression profiling [3]. Thirty-two samples were finally tested, among which two samples C501 (Luminal A) and N513 (normal) were from the same patient, others are unmatched samples.

RNA labeling and hybridization

Cyanine-3 (Cy3) labeled cRNA was prepared from 100 ng RNA using the One-Color Low Input Quick Amp labeling kit (Agilent, Valencia, CA) according to manufacturer's instructions, followed by RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) purification. Dye incorporation and cRNA yield were checked with the NanoDrop Spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, Inc.).

RNA hybridization

For hybridization, 0.6 μg of Cy3-labeled cRNA [4] (specific activity > 8 pmol Cy3/μg cRNA) was fragmented at 60 °C for 30 min in a reaction volume of 25 μL containing 1× Agilent fragmentation buffer and 2 × Agilent blocking agent following manufacturers ' instructions. On completion of the fragmentation reaction, 25 μL of 2× Agilent hybridization buffer was added to the fragmentation mixture and hybridized to Agilent Whole Human Genome Oligo Microarrays (GPL17077) for 17 h at 65 °C in a rotating Agilent hybridization oven.

Microarray scanning

After hybridization, microarrays were washed for 1 min at room temperature with GE Wash Buffer 1 (Agilent) and 1 min with 37 °C GE Wash buffer 2 (Agilent), then dried using Agilent stabilization and drying solution. Slides were scanned immediately after washing on the Agilent DNA Microarray Scanner (G2505C) using one color scan setting for 1 × 60k array slides (Scan Area 61 × 21 mm, Scan resolution 3 μM, Dye channel is set to Green and Green PMT is set to 100%) [5].

Data normalization and quality control

The raw signals were log transformed and normalized using the Percentile shift normalization method, the value was set at 75th percentile (Agilent GeneSpring 12.6 manual, 22.2.1, P584) [6]. For each probe, the median of the log summarized values from all the samples was calculated and subtracted from each of the samples to get transformed baseline. The parameter values for experimental grouping were set as Luminal A, Luminal B, Triple negative, and Normal. Probes with normalized intensity values below 20th percentile were filtered out using the “Filter probe sets by Expression” option. This resulted in 42,875 genes, which were further filtered to exclude probes with standard deviation < 1 in all groups, resulting in 16,822 genes.

Differential expression

Volcano plots, representing the distribution of the fold changes and p-values (obtained from moderated t-test [7]) of the above 16,822 genes, were shown in Fig. 1 corresponding to each subgroup (Luminal A, Luminal B, and Triple negative). The moderated t-test is one of the statistical tests provided by the GeneSpring 12.6 software as a modification of the unpaired t-test (Agilent GeneSpring 12.6 manual, 22.3.7, P589).
Fig. 1

Volcano plots showing the distribution of the gene expression fold changes in each subgroup (A) Luminal A, (B) Luminal B, and (C) Triple negative compared with normal controls. Genes with absolute fold change ≥ 2 and p-value ≤ 0.05 are indicated in red. Plots are generated using GeneSpring 12.6 with moderated t-test and Benjamini –Hochberg testing correction.

Furthermore, 779 genes were identified with p-value ≤ 0.05 (One-Way ANOVA with asymptotic computation and Benjamin–Hochberg multiple testing corrections) and fold change ≥ 2 [8], [9] in all three breast cancer subtypes. The heat map for these 779 genes is shown in Fig. 2.
Fig. 2

Heat map showing different expression pattern of 779 genes out of 50,739 biological probes after one-way ANOVA test with a corrected p-value < 0.05 and fold change ≥ 2 in all three breast cancer subtypes using GeneSpring 12.6 software. The heat map indicates up-regulation (red), down-regulation (green), and mean gene expression (black). The columns represent individual tissue samples covering three breast cancer subtypes: Luminal A (red), Luminal B (yellow), and Triple negative (purple) as well as normal samples (blue). The rows represent individual genes.

Conclusion

Herein we described the gene regulation information for breast cancer gene profiling using Agilent SurePrint G3 Human Gene Expression Microarray technology. Our gene expression microarray data provided an important resource for exploring and identifying gene biomarkers involved in breast cancer.

Disclosures

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Specifications
Organism/cell line/tissueHomo sapiens
SexFemale
Sequencer or array typeAgilent SurePrint G3 Human Gene Expression v2 8 × 60K Microarray
Data formatRaw data: TAR. Normalized data: SOFT, MINiML, TXT.
Experimental factorsGene expression profiling in breast cancer tissues vs. normal controls
Experimental featuresThirty-two human breast tissues of three different breast cancer subtypes (including Luminal A, Luminal B, Triple negative) and normal controls were examined with Agilent microarray technology for gene expression profiling. The breast cancer subtypes were determined by pathology report of positive or negative status of ER, PR and HER2.
ConsentAll patients consented before starting the study.
Sample source locationClinical and Translational Science Institute (CTSI), University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States.
  9 in total

1.  Normalization for cDNA microarray data: a robust composite method addressing single and multiple slide systematic variation.

Authors:  Yee Hwa Yang; Sandrine Dudoit; Percy Luu; David M Lin; Vivian Peng; John Ngai; Terence P Speed
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 2.  Gene expression data analysis.

Authors:  A Brazma; J Vilo
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2000-08-25       Impact factor: 4.124

3.  Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study.

Authors:  Lisa A Carey; Charles M Perou; Chad A Livasy; Lynn G Dressler; David Cowan; Kathleen Conway; Gamze Karaca; Melissa A Troester; Chiu Kit Tse; Sharon Edmiston; Sandra L Deming; Joseph Geradts; Maggie C U Cheang; Torsten O Nielsen; Patricia G Moorman; H Shelton Earp; Robert C Millikan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-06-07       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  Normalization and quantification of differential expression in gene expression microarrays.

Authors:  Christine Steinhoff; Martin Vingron
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2006-03-07       Impact factor: 11.622

5.  Linear models and empirical bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments.

Authors:  Gordon K Smyth
Journal:  Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2004-02-12

6.  Preparation of fluorescent-dye-labeled cDNA from RNA for microarray hybridization.

Authors:  Manuel Ares
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Protoc       Date:  2014-01-01

7.  Scanning microarray slides.

Authors:  Manuel Ares
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Protoc       Date:  2014-02-01

8.  Human postmortem tissue: what quality markers matter?

Authors:  Ana D Stan; Subroto Ghose; Xue-Min Gao; Rosalinda C Roberts; Kelly Lewis-Amezcua; Kimmo J Hatanpaa; Carol A Tamminga
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-12       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 9.  Breast cancer molecular subtypes--modern therapeutic concepts for targeted therapy of a heterogeneous entity.

Authors:  Cornelia Liedtke; Ludwig Kiesel
Journal:  Maturitas       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 4.342

  9 in total
  10 in total

1.  Identification of breast cancer mechanism based on weighted gene coexpression network analysis.

Authors:  X Guo; H Xiao; S Guo; L Dong; J Chen
Journal:  Cancer Gene Ther       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 5.987

2.  Network analysis revealed aurora kinase dysregulation in five gynecological types of cancer.

Authors:  Shikha Suman; Ashutosh Mishra
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 2.967

3.  Discovery of Gene Regulation Pattern in Lung Cancer by Gene Expression Profiling Using Human Tissues.

Authors:  Junjie Fu; Ravil Khaybullin; Xiao Liang; Madeleine Morin; Amy Xia; Anderson Yeh; Xin Qi
Journal:  Genom Data       Date:  2015-03-01

4.  Dysregulated expression of death, stress and mitochondrion related genes in the sciatic nerve of presymptomatic SOD1(G93A) mouse model of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.

Authors:  Chrystian J Alves; Jessica R Maximino; Gerson Chadi
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 5.505

5.  Gene expression profiling leads to discovery of correlation of matrix metalloproteinase 11 and heparanase 2 in breast cancer progression.

Authors:  Junjie Fu; Ravil Khaybullin; Yanping Zhang; Amy Xia; Xin Qi
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Over-expression of NOTCH1 as a biomarker for invasive breast ductal carcinoma.

Authors:  Mahdi Paryan; Rezvan Tavakoli; Seyed Mohammad Ali Hosseini Rad; Neda Feizi; Fereshteh Kamani; Ehsan Mostafavi; Samira Mohammadi-Yeganeh
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2016-02-13       Impact factor: 2.406

7.  Model-based analysis of competing-endogenous pathways (MACPath) in human cancers.

Authors:  Hyun Jung Park; Soyeon Kim; Wei Li
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  A systems biology pipeline identifies new immune and disease related molecular signatures and networks in human cells during microgravity exposure.

Authors:  Sayak Mukhopadhyay; Rohini Saha; Anbarasi Palanisamy; Madhurima Ghosh; Anupriya Biswas; Saheli Roy; Arijit Pal; Kathakali Sarkar; Sangram Bagh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Development of a Novel Diagnostic Biomarker Set for Rheumatoid Arthritis Using a Proteomics Approach.

Authors:  Sora Mun; Jiyeong Lee; Mi-Kyoung Lim; You-Rim Lee; Chunhwa Ihm; Seung Hoon Lee; Hee-Gyoo Kang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  LINC00467, Driven by Copy Number Amplification and DNA Demethylation, Is Associated with Oxidative Lipid Metabolism and Immune Infiltration in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Hao Bo; Wancong Zhang; Xiaoping Zhong; Jiasheng Chen; Yang Liu; Kit-Leong Cheong; Pengju Fan; Shijie Tang
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 6.543

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.