| Literature DB >> 25395910 |
Adam B Loyer1, Mohammed Ali1, Diana Loyer1.
Abstract
Myanmar (formerly Burma) is a southeast Asian country, with a long history of military dictatorship, human rights violations, and poor health indicators. The health situation is particularly dire among pregnant women in the ethnic minorities of the eastern provinces (Kachin, Shan, Mon, Karen and Karenni regions). This integrative review investigates the current status of maternal mortality in eastern Myanmar in the context of armed conflict between various separatist groups and the military regime. The review examines the underlying factors contributing to high maternal mortality in eastern Myanmar and assesses gaps in the existing research, suggesting areas for further research and policy response. Uncovered were a number of underlying factors uniquely contributing to maternal mortality in eastern Myanmar. These could be grouped into the following analytical themes: ongoing conflict, health system deficits, and political and socioeconomic influences. Abortion was interestingly not identified as an important contributor to maternal mortality. Recent political liberalization may provide space to act upon identified roles and opportunities for the Myanmar Government, the international community, and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in a manner that positively impacts on maternal healthcare in the eastern regions of Myanmar. This review makes a number of recommendations to this effect.Entities:
Keywords: Burma/Myanmar; Government; Human rights violations; International aid; Liberalization; MMR; Maternal health; Maternal mortality; Policy; Pregnancy
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25395910 PMCID: PMC4221453
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Health Popul Nutr ISSN: 1606-0997 Impact factor: 2.000
Data-collection tool
| Author ......................... | |
| Year ............................ | |
| Title ........................... | |
| Type of study: (report, quantitative, survey, qualitative…) | |
| Direct medical causes | 1b |
| 1c. Sepsis | |
| Access to MHC services | 1t. Poor transportation |
| 1w. Cost for use of healthcare 1-hinders usage | |
| Availability and use of MHC services (incomplete abortion) | 1d. Ministry of Health facilities 1-fewer facilities in E 2-no/lack of facilities 3-poorly functioning |
| 1f. Poorer access to health services | |
| 1x. Few financial resources for health | |
| 1y. Illegal, unregulated medicines | |
| 2a. Abortion 1-anti-abortion policy-dangerous abortion | |
| 2b. Natal policy (allows for birth spacing) | |
| 2c. Sexual health services and contraception | |
| 2d. Ministry of Health facilities 1-fewer facilities in E 2-no/lack of facilities | |
| 1h. HR shortage | |
| MHC services | 1a. Dangerous abortions |
| 1e. Location of birth 1-home most common 2-jungle | |
| 2f. Birth attendants | |
| 1l. Skilled attendance at birth (any level) | |
| 1m. Antenatal visits (any number) | |
| 1.i. Lack of EOC services | |
| 1s. Postnatal care | |
| Health of mother (pre-existing) | 1o. Iron supplements |
| 1q. Anaemia | |
| 1j. High anaemia | |
| 1n. Malaria presence/malarial insecticide-treated bednets | |
| 1k. High malaria | |
| 1r. Age at marriage | |
| Contraception | 1p. Unmet contraceptive need |
| 1u. Modern contraceptive usage | |
| Lack of data collection | 2g. Statistics 1-E not in census 2-lack of reliable data |
| NGO limitations and hindrances | 2e. Geographic distribution of NGOs |
| 1g. Difficult for NGOs to access | |
| 2h. Humanitarian space 1-not given access | |
| 2i. NGOs not free to work | |
| 2j. Military autonomy/self-reliance | |
| 2k. Cumbersome procedures for NGOs | |
| 2l. Visa restrictions to NGO staff | |
| Sexual violence | 3b. Rape 1-2-sexual violence |
| 4a. Sex slaves | |
| 3s.i. Sexualized torture | |
| 4b. Human trafficking | |
| Relocation/ displacement | 3d. Relocation 1-forced |
| Personal violation/violence | 3f. Violence 1-to civilians |
| 3p. Human minesweepers | |
| 3i. Torture 1 | |
| 3j. Killing 1 | |
| 3u. Intentional targeting of civilians | |
| Targeting of medical staff, buildings, supplies | 3s |
| 3h. Detain, kill medical workers 1-happens | |
| 3g. Destroy medical supplies 1-destruction | |
| Conflict-related barriers to accessing MHC | 3c. Clinic accessibility 1-landmines 2-patrols |
| 3s.iii. Restricted movement 1-civilians | |
| 3m. Detain 1-civilians | |
| 3k. Landmines 1-hurt civilians 2-hurt med workers | |
| 3l. Ongoing conflict | |
| Removal of food and money sources | 3a. Food security 1-burning of fields 2-stealing of crops 3-destruction crops |
| 3e. Forced labour 1-occurs 2-porter service 3-road building | |
| 3n. Conscription | |
| 3o. Burning/destruction of homes or villages | |
| 3q. Human shields | |
| 3r. Theft 1-fines 2-property 3-taxes | |
11a is not missing, it is the first item in the ‘MHC Services’ section of the table. The items are not in sequence because, when these were grouped into broader themes (as described in the methods section), these maintained their numbering and lettering
2Restricted movement of medical personnel—travel limitations for medical personnel due to conflict, threats of violence, landmines, etc.
Study summary
| Author, year and title | Design and sampling | Factors measured | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| Back Pack Health Worker Team (BPHWT), 2010 Diagnosis: Critical health and human rights in eastern Burma ( | Survey design Sample: mothers of youngest child interviewed Sampling frame: 325,094 people and 57,950 households from 273 randomly-selected villages from 4 states and 2 divisions—between Sept 2008 and Jan 2009 | Anthropometry Malaria/diarrhoea Landmine injuries Reproductive history | MMR 721 deaths/100 000 livebirths Pregnancy and childbirth=2.2% of all deaths Malaria=24.7% of deaths Diarrhoea=14.9% of deaths Landmines and gunshot=2.3% 14.7% met criteria for iron supplementation 78.2% of women didn't use modern contraception 18% malnourished 1/3 of households experienced at least 1 HRV in last year Forced labour in household=2.5X higher chance of infant death |
| BPHWT, 2006 Chronic emergency: health and human rights in eastern Burma ( | Survey design and semi-structured interviews Sample: household heads Sampling frame: 140,000 people and 2,000 households taken from 100 clusters | Anthropometry Malaria/diarrhoea Contraceptives Iron supplements Mortality rates Forced labour Attacks Theft/destruction of livestock Denial of care Forced relocation | MMR 1,000-1,200 deaths/100,000 livebirths Lifetime risk of maternal death: 1 in 12 12.6% positive for malaria 9.8% suffered diarrhoea 4% of IDP women had access to EOC Approx 80% never used contraceptives 40% received iron supplementation Crude birth rate 41.8/1,000 % of households who experienced: forced labour 32.9% soldier violence 1.9% forced displacement 9% food destroyed/looted 25.7% households landmine injuries/deaths 0.3% |
| Mullany | Survey design Sample: household heads Sampling frame: 129,000 people and 2,000 households taken from 100 clusters | Anthropometry Malaria/diarrhoea Mortality rates Forced labour Theft/destruction of food Denial of care landmine injury Forced relocation | Almost 1/3 households reported forced labour 8.9% forced displacement 25.2% theft/destruction of food Multiple HRVs in 14.4% of households Forced displacement= 2.8 X increased risk of child mortality 3.22 X increased risk of malnutrition 3.89 X increased risk of landmine injury Theft/destruction food supply= 1.58 X increase in crude mortality 1.82 X increased risk of malaria parasitemia 1.94 X increased risk of child malnutrition 4.55 X increased risk of landmine injury |
| Mullany | Survey design Sample: 3,000 women between 15 and 45 years Sampling frame: 60,000 people from 12 project communities | Access to antenatal and postnatal care, family planning services Skilled attendance at birth Anthropometry Malaria/Hb Forced labour Forced relocation | 88% home delivery 5.1% skilled delivery 39.3% any antenatal visits, 16.7% at least 4 visits 21.6% bednets 11.8% receipt of iron supplements >60% unmet need 7.2% Pf malaria >60% Hb less or equal 11g/dL >50% anaemic (women) % of households experiencing: forced labour 32.1% forced displacement 10% Older women reported 6.9 pregnancies Mean MUAC (women) 24.4 cm, <22.5 cm in 19.3% Anaemia: 1.51 times higher (95% CI 0.95-2.40) among women reporting forced displacement 7.47 times higher (95% CI 2.21-25.3) among women reporting food security violations Odds of receiving no antenatal care 5.94 times higher (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.23-15.8) among forcibly displaced women |
| Mullany | Survey design (before and after) Sample: women between 15 and 45 years 2,889 in 2006, 2,442 in 2008 Sampling frame: 60,000 people from 12 project communities | Demographics Access to antenatal and postnatal care, family planning services Skilled attendance at birth Anthropometry Malaria/Hb Forced labour Forced relocation | Similar demographics between 2 groups Following the intervention: More likely to receive antenatal care (71.8 vs 39.3%); postnatal care (PRR)=1.83 (95% CI 1.64-2.04) Double rate of postnatal care (PRR)=2.07 (95% CI 1.81-2.37) Unmet contraceptive need down to 40.5 from 61.7% PRR=0.65 (95% CI 28%-40%) Modern contraception increased from 23.9% to 45.0% PRR=1.88 (95% CI 1.63-2.17) Attendance at birth increased almost 10 X from 5.1 to 48.7% PRR=9.55 (95% CI 7.21-12.64) More likely to undergo malaria screening (55.9% versus 21.9% PRR=2.88 (95% CI 2.15-3.85) |
| Grundy | Review study Sample: public health and health systems literature OECD and WHO databases Primary data via field visits to North Korea and Myanmar | Regional trends in overseas aid-flows Maternal and child health indicators National health system funding | Despite higher child and maternal mortality rates, aid-flows up until 2008 were significantly lower in Myanmar than other SE Asian countries Aid-flow per capita to Myanmar among the lowest in the SE Asian region (OECD 2009) Myanmar largely excluded from multi-lateral aid Health system on the verge of collapse due to neglect by national government and international community |
| Teela | Qualitative design Sample: maternal health workers (MHWs) Focus groups Semi-structured interviews Case studies Informal discussions Questionnaire Unstructured interviews | Qualitative information regarding experience: introduction to and relationships with community, collaboration among health workers, intervention-related topics, coverage and access issues, supply, and logistics problems | Trust necessary for timely care to be achieved Some EOC services can be delivered in the community Challenges to MHC service delivery were overcome (e.g. security problems, transportation issues) Successes: impartial care and consistent support of communities in turmoil, increased MHW confidence, expansion of family planning services, increased collaboration between 3 tiers (Traditional birth attendant, health worker, maternal health worker), expansion of TBA roles in some communities (e.g. prophylactic misoprostol) |
| Saha 2011 Working through ambiguity: international NGOs in Myanmar ( | Qualitative design Sample: 15 interviews with INGO, NGO and bilateral donor country personnel and US-based INGO staff, scholars and analysts, and research and analysis | The landscape and arrangements under which organizations operate Whether and how interventions are reaching and impacting those in need Ways human-itarian access can be expanded Ways independence and impact can be safeguarded Examples of effective work appearing Identify/share innovative way to work Explore collaboration | Key challenges uncovered: human rights violations, ongoing conflict, poor public health, lack of governmental will and capacity to provide health services, lack of expatriate staff mobility, fluctuating visa approvals, limited humanitarian space, uncertain restriction status, short-term donor funding Key findings: recent shift in government tone regarding NGOs, INGOs confront serious ethical/operational dilemmas, constitutional and political structural change is promising, humanitarian space has opened significantly since Cyclone Nargis, INGOs and analysts believe in aid delivery without bolstering Government, INGOs believe they're having a positive impact (e.g. building local capacity), donor assistance could be delivered effectively in most parts of Myanmar, there is no optimal way in which to work, capacity-building and participatory development is vital, advocacy to Government is vital, careful use of safeguards important |
MMR=Maternal mortality ratio; IDP=Internally-displaced person; EOC=Emergency obstetric care; HRV=Human rights violation; Hb=Haemoglobin; Pf=Plasmodium falciparum; MUAC=Mid-upper arm-circumference; OECD=Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development; WHO=World Health Organization; SE=Southeast; MHC=Maternal healthcare; TBA=Traditional birth attendant; NGOs=Non-governmental organizations; INGOs=International non-governmental organizations; US=United States (of America)
Extracted themes: influences on maternal mortality in eastern Myanmar
| Influences on maternal mortality in eastern Myanmar | |
|---|---|
| Analytical themes | Descriptive themes |
| Conflict-related underlying factors of MMR in the eastern regions | Personal violation or violence ( |
| Removal of food and the means to purchase food ( | |
| Forced labour ( | |
| Forced relocation or displacement ( | |
| Targeting of medical staff, buildings, and supplies ( | |
| Health system-related underlying factors of MMR in the eastern regions | Access to and availability of MHC |
| Presence of MHC services ( | |
| Contraception ( | |
| Underlying political factors of MMR in the eastern regions | Limitations placed upon NGOs ( |
| The lack of health-related data ( | |
| Socioeconomic underlying factors of MMR in the eastern regions | Co-existing morbidity among pregnant women ( |
*MHC=Maternal healthcare
Figure.Web of underlying causes of maternal mortality in eastern Myanmar