Sanja Sefic Kasumovic1, Aida Kasumovic1, Suzana Pavljasevic2, Emir Cabric3, Milka Mavija4, Irena Sesar5, Sabina Dacić- Lepara6, Mirko Jankov7. 1. Eye Policlinic "Dr. Sefić", Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina. 2. Public Health Centre, Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzergovina. 3. "Public Health Care Institution Doboj-Jug, Matuzići", Bosnia and Herzegovina. 4. University Clinical Center, Banjaluka, Bosnia and Herzegovina. 5. University Clinical Hospital ,Mostar. 6. Faculty of Electrical engineering, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina. 7. Laser Fokus Centre for Eye Microsurgery, Beograd, Serbi.
Abstract
GOAL: the purpose of the current study was to estimate the predictive values of optical coherence tomography parameters in early, developed perimetric and terminal glaucoma. METHODS: 180 eyes of 120 consecutive patients were evaluated in this retrospective cross sectional pilot study. Copernicus Spectral -domain optical coherence tomography with resolution of 3 mm obtained throught the optic nerve head were included. All examined eyes were divided to four groups (healthy,early, developed perimetric glaucoma and terminal glaucoma). The values of the thicknes of the retinal nerve fibre layer, the size of the disk, the volume of the cup, the E/D parameter and the size of the RIM were compared in four study groups. RESULTS: The sensitivity of RNFL was 90,0%, specificity 82,0 %, positive predictability 83,3 % and negative predictability was 89,1 %. The total accuracy was 86,0 % and area under curve (AUC) was 0,878 for RNFL indeks compering early to developed glaucoma. The sensitivity for CUP was 78%, the specificity was 80,8 %, the positive predictability 81,2% and the negative predictability was 77,5 %. The total accuracy was 79,3 % and area under curve (AUC) was 0,86 compering early to developed glaucoma. The sensitivity for E/D was 82,0%, the specificity was 82,9 % the positive predictability 83,7 % and the negative predictability was 81,3 %. The total accuracy was 82,5 % and area under curve (AUC) for E/D was 0,89 compering eearly to developed glaucoma. The sensitivity for RIM was 78,0%, the specificity was 76,6 %, the positive predictability was 84,7 and the negative predictability was 67,7 %. The total accuracy was 77,5 % and area under curve (AUC) for the RIM compering the developed to terminal glaucoma was 0,792. The sensitivity of RNFL was 88,0 %, the specificity was 66,7 %, the positive predictability was 81,5% and the negative predictability was 76,9%. The total accuracy was 80,0% and the area under curve (AUC) for RNFL compering developed to terminal glaucoma was 0,815. The incrreasing 0,1 unit RNFL decreases the risk of developing glaucoma from early to another developed stage of glaucoma for 6,95%. The increasing of E/D for only one unit increases the risk to develop another stage of glaucoma for 18,75 times. The increasing of RNFL for only one unit decreases the risk of performing developed glaucoma from initial stage for 7,8%. The increasing for only one unit of CUP increases the risk to develop terminal glaucoma for 8,47 times and increasing for 0,1 unit of the value of RIM decreases the risk developing terminal glaucoma for 9,27%. The increasing for 0,01 unit of the E/D index increases the risk for terminal glaucoma for 23,23 times. The increasing for one unit of RNFL decreasing the risk developing terminal glaucoma for 5,7%.
GOAL: the purpose of the current study was to estimate the predictive values of optical coherence tomography parameters in early, developed perimetric and terminal glaucoma. METHODS: 180 eyes of 120 consecutive patients were evaluated in this retrospective cross sectional pilot study. Copernicus Spectral -domain optical coherence tomography with resolution of 3 mm obtained throught the optic nerve head were included. All examined eyes were divided to four groups (healthy,early, developed perimetric glaucoma and terminal glaucoma). The values of the thicknes of the retinal nerve fibre layer, the size of the disk, the volume of the cup, the E/D parameter and the size of the RIM were compared in four study groups. RESULTS: The sensitivity of RNFL was 90,0%, specificity 82,0 %, positive predictability 83,3 % and negative predictability was 89,1 %. The total accuracy was 86,0 % and area under curve (AUC) was 0,878 for RNFL indeks compering early to developed glaucoma. The sensitivity for CUP was 78%, the specificity was 80,8 %, the positive predictability 81,2% and the negative predictability was 77,5 %. The total accuracy was 79,3 % and area under curve (AUC) was 0,86 compering early to developed glaucoma. The sensitivity for E/D was 82,0%, the specificity was 82,9 % the positive predictability 83,7 % and the negative predictability was 81,3 %. The total accuracy was 82,5 % and area under curve (AUC) for E/D was 0,89 compering eearly to developed glaucoma. The sensitivity for RIM was 78,0%, the specificity was 76,6 %, the positive predictability was 84,7 and the negative predictability was 67,7 %. The total accuracy was 77,5 % and area under curve (AUC) for the RIM compering the developed to terminal glaucoma was 0,792. The sensitivity of RNFL was 88,0 %, the specificity was 66,7 %, the positive predictability was 81,5% and the negative predictability was 76,9%. The total accuracy was 80,0% and the area under curve (AUC) for RNFL compering developed to terminal glaucoma was 0,815. The incrreasing 0,1 unit RNFL decreases the risk of developing glaucoma from early to another developed stage of glaucoma for 6,95%. The increasing of E/D for only one unit increases the risk to develop another stage of glaucoma for 18,75 times. The increasing of RNFL for only one unit decreases the risk of performing developed glaucoma from initial stage for 7,8%. The increasing for only one unit of CUP increases the risk to develop terminal glaucoma for 8,47 times and increasing for 0,1 unit of the value of RIM decreases the risk developing terminal glaucoma for 9,27%. The increasing for 0,01 unit of the E/D index increases the risk for terminal glaucoma for 23,23 times. The increasing for one unit of RNFL decreasing the risk developing terminal glaucoma for 5,7%.
The progressive glaucomatous optic disc atrophy is characterized by the optic disc changes, including enlargement of the optic disc cup and the loss of the neuroretinal rim. Morphologic changes may precede loss of function as the tests of the visual field (1, 2). Optical coherence tomography (OCT) was introduced approximately 20 years ago and has achived an important role in present clinical diagnostics (3, 4).With aim to diagnosed glaucoma it is fundamental to identify glaucoma progression in order to intesify the treatment before nerve fiber loss proceeds. In terminal glaucoma the deterioration can be identified by the changes in the visual field testing and the thinning of the nerve fibre layer (5).Few data exist about long term course of OCT measurements and its relevance for detection of glaucoma progression. Wollstein et al.(6) found a loss of average RNFL thickness of 11,7 microns within 4,7 years in glaucomapatients.
2. AIM OF THE STUDY
The aim of the study is to emphasise which index of OCT testing shows the most important predictor values to indentify the glaucoma progression.
3. METHODS
Total number of 180 eyes of 120 consecutive patients were evaluated in this retrospective cross sectional pilot study. Copernicus SD-OCT with resolution of 3 mm obtained throught the optic nerve head (ONH) were included. All examined eyes were divided to four groups. The size of the disc (size), the volume of cup (cup), cup/disc ratio (E/D), size of the rim (rim) and the thichness of the retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) were observed in 50 healthy eyes, 50 eyes with the signs of initial open angle, preperimetric glaucoma, 50 eyes with developed simplex glaucoma and 30 eyes with terminal glaucoma signs (final glaucomatous atrophy). Exclusion criteria were ocular hypertension, other optic nerve neuropathies causing optic nerve atrophy and angle closure glaucoma. The diagnosis of glaucoma was made if one or more of the following morphological criteria were present : thinning or notching of the neuroretinal rim, loss of peripapillary RNFL, unfulfilled inferior-superior, nasal-temporal rule. Pathologic visual field test results associated with a pathologic optic disc configuration confirmed the diagnosis but were not necessary for the inclusion to the study.These results were incorporated in the final statistical conclusion.All statistical analyses were performed in SPSS for Windows v17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Il, USA). The specificity and sensitivity OCT parameters as potential markers progression of disease was investigated by ROC curve. Binary logistic regression was performed to show how changing variables can influence progression of the disease. All the tests were performed with the significance level of 0.05.
4. RESULTS
Results are presented in Tables 1 -3 and Figures 1 -2-
Table 1
Independent predictors of progression glaucoma from initial to developed stage (binar logistic regression)
Table 3
The sensitivity and specificity OCT parameters in assesment of early stages glaucoma (incipient vs. control eyes). PP –positive predictive value. NP –negative predictive value. CI – confidence interval. AUC- area under curve
Figure 1
The sensitivity and the specificity of the OCT parameters in an assessment the initial to developing glaucoma (initial vs. developed perimetric glaucoma) PP –positive predictive value, NP –negative predictive value, CI – confidence interval, AUC- area under curve
Figure 2
The sensitivity and the specificity of OCT parameters in assesment terminal glaucoma compering to developed glaucoma (developed vs. terminal glaucoma). PP –positive predictive value, NP –negative predictive value, CI – confidence interval, AUC- area under curve
Independent predictors of progression glaucoma from initial to developed stage (binar logistic regression)The independent predictors of progression terminal, absolute glaucoma from developing stage of the disease (binar logistic regression)The sensitivity and specificity OCT parameters in assesment of early stages glaucoma (incipient vs. control eyes). PP –positive predictive value. NP –negative predictive value. CI – confidence interval. AUC- area under curveThe sensitivity and the specificity of the OCT parameters in an assessment the initial to developing glaucoma (initial vs. developed perimetric glaucoma) PP –positive predictive value, NP –negative predictive value, CI – confidence interval, AUC- area under curveThe sensitivity and the specificity of OCT parameters in assesment terminal glaucoma compering to developed glaucoma (developed vs. terminal glaucoma). PP –positive predictive value, NP –negative predictive value, CI – confidence interval, AUC- area under curveAn increasing of the RIM for 1 unit decreases the risk to develop manifest glaucoma for 69,5%. The increasing of the E/D relation for 0,01 unit increases the risk developing manifest glaucoma for 17,75%. The enlargement of the RNLF index for one unit decreases the risk developing manifest glaucoma from initial stage of the dissease for 7,8% (Table 1).The increasing of the CUP for 0,1 unit increases the risk developing absolute glaucoma for 74,7 %. The increasing of the RIM-a for 1 unit decreases the risk to develop terminal glaucoma for 92,7 %. The enlargement of the E/D relation for 0,001 unit increases the risc developing absolute glaucoma for 22,27 %. The increasing of the RNLF for only one unit decreases the risk of terminal glaucoma for 5,7% (Table 2).
Table 2
The independent predictors of progression terminal, absolute glaucoma from developing stage of the disease (binar logistic regression)
The sensitivity for the CUP was 78,0%, the specificity 80,8%, the positive predictability 81,2%, negative predictability 77,5%. The total or final accuracy was 79,3%. AUC for CUP was 0,866 (Table 3).The sensitivity for the E/D was 82,0%, the specificity 82,9%, the positive predictability 83,7%, negative predictability was 81,3%. The final accuracy was 82,5%. AUC for the E/D was 0,899. The sensitivity for the RNFL was 90,0%, the specificity was 82,0%, the positive predictability was 83,3%, the negative predictability was 89,1%. The final accuracy was 86,0%. AUC for the RNFL was 0,878 (Figure 1).The sensitivity of the RIM was 78,0%, the specificity was 76,6%, the positive predictability was 84,7%, negative predictability was 67,6%. The final accuracy was 77,5%. The AUC for RIM was 0,792.The sensitivity for the RNFL was 88,0%, the specificity was 66,7%, the positive predictability 81,5%, negative predictability was 76,9%. The total accuracy was 80,0%. The AUC for RNFL was 0,815 (Figure 2).
5. DISCUSSION
Our opinion is that the detection of progression is crucial for prognosis in glaucoma. The morphologic changes in adults are incurable. Reduction of the intraocular pressure is the main therapeutic strategy to predict and avoid progression of the disease (7).Lee et al. (8) performed a trend-based analysis using Stratus OCT. The rate of progression of -1,58 microns per year in progressors and of -0,34 microns per year in nonprogressors. The rate of change found by Medeiros et al. (9) in the trend based analysis was lower with a rate of change of -0,72 microns per year in progressors.Krupa et al. (10) showed that E/D parameter had the highest sensitivity and speciticity as well as high positive likelihood ratio and near-zero negative likelihood ratio. The NFI and MD parameters showed lower likelihood ratios and their applicability for the diagnosis of primary open-angle glaucoma is limited. These results are according to our study results.Wang et al.(11) identified several structural features that were significantly different between healthy and glaucomatous eyes. Axonal loss as well as remodeling would contribute to smaller lamina cribrosa pores creating in beam thickness to pore diametar ratio with disease. They observed a significant increase in pore diameter in glaucomatous eyes. It may represent focal damage in glaucoma causing some pores to drasticlly lose diameter thus increasing the the variabiliy in the structure in optic nerve head.DARC (Detection of apoptotic retinal cells) is going to be the new technique which utilizes the unique optical properties of the eye to directly visualize retinal ganglion cell death. It gives glaucoma physicians the opportunity to detect glaucoma earlier and monitor the response to treatment in a visual and quantifiable manner (12,13).Werkmeister et al. (14) emphasised that imaging in glaucomapatients focuses on ONH, the RNFL and te RGC layer. Among these options, the imaging of RGCs is the most promising approach because the loss of RGCs is directly associated with the characteristic glaucomatous visual field loss. The understanding of the structure-functional relationship in glaucoma has also significantly increased (15, 16).
6. CONCLUSION
In conclusion, we demonstrated the importance of the structural changes of optic nerve head with aim to asses the management and treatement of progressive glaucoma eye in spite of good funcional results and no thinning of RNFL. Glaucomatous eyes typically had thinner RNFL but the statistically different structural ratios inside the optic nerve head. Therefore it is important to consider the changes inside the optic disc under the regular clinical glaucoma follow up.It is an exciting time for physicians and over the next decade will certainly see advances in early detection (RNFL) and efficacious treatments and neuroprotection (structural changes of ONH).
Authors: D Huang; E A Swanson; C P Lin; J S Schuman; W G Stinson; W Chang; M R Hee; T Flotte; K Gregory; C A Puliafito Journal: Science Date: 1991-11-22 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: J S Schuman; M R Hee; C A Puliafito; C Wong; T Pedut-Kloizman; C P Lin; E Hertzmark; J A Izatt; E A Swanson; J G Fujimoto Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 1995-05
Authors: C A Puliafito; M R Hee; C P Lin; E Reichel; J S Schuman; J S Duker; J A Izatt; E A Swanson; J G Fujimoto Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 1995-02 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Gadi Wollstein; Joel S Schuman; Lori L Price; Ali Aydin; Paul C Stark; Ellen Hertzmark; Edward Lai; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Cynthia Mattox; James G Fujimoto; Lelia A Paunescu Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2005-04
Authors: Felipe A Medeiros; Linda M Zangwill; Luciana M Alencar; Christopher Bowd; Pamela A Sample; Remo Susanna; Robert N Weinreb Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2009-10-08 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Julia M Wessel; Folkert K Horn; Ralf P Tornow; Matthias Schmid; Christian Y Mardin; Friedrich E Kruse; Anselm G Juenemann; Robert Laemmer Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2013-05-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Felipe A Medeiros; Renato Lisboa; Robert N Weinreb; Christopher A Girkin; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Linda M Zangwill Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2012-09