Literature DB >> 25395154

Adult right living-donor liver transplantation with special reference to reconstruction of the middle hepatic vein.

N Akamatsu1, Y Sugawara, R Nagata, J Kaneko, T Aoki, Y Sakamoto, K Hasegawa, N Kokudo.   

Abstract

Two hundred fifty-three consecutive living-donor liver transplant recipients with a right liver graft (RLG) were divided into three groups: an extended right liver graft (ERLG) group (n = 47) in which the middle hepatic vein (MHV) trunk was included in the graft, a modified right liver graft (MRLG) group (n = 114) in which the MHV tributaries were reconstructed with cryopreserved homologous veins and a simple RLG group (n = 92) in which the MHV tributaries were sacrificed. The volume of the anterior sector was significantly impaired in the RLG group compared to the other two groups, whereas the volume of the posterior sector was significantly improved in the RLG group, indicating that the impaired anterior sector regeneration by MHV deprivation was compensated by the posterior sector regeneration. The regeneration rate of the anterior sector was highest in the ERLG group (92%), moderate in the MRLG group (71%) and lowest in the RLG group (52%). The whole graft regeneration rate of the ERLG group was significantly higher than that of the other two groups. Poor regeneration, however, was not correlated with delayed functional recovery or long-term outcome. Short-term, the patency of reconstructed MHV tributaries was over 90%, but occlusion occurred frequently over the long-term, especially in V5. © Copyright 2014 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical research/practice; donor hepatectomy; liver transplantation/hepatology; liver transplantation: living donor

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25395154     DOI: 10.1111/ajt.12917

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transplant        ISSN: 1600-6135            Impact factor:   8.086


  5 in total

Review 1.  Simulation and navigation liver surgery: an update after 2,000 virtual hepatectomies.

Authors:  Akinori Miyata; Junichi Arita; Yoshikuni Kawaguchi; Kiyoshi Hasegawa; Norihiro Kokudo
Journal:  Glob Health Med       Date:  2020-10-31

2.  Venous drainage map of the liver for complex hepatobiliary surgery and liver transplantation.

Authors:  Keigo Tani; Junichi Shindoh; Nobuhisa Akamatsu; Junichi Arita; Junichi Kaneko; Yoshihiro Sakamoto; Kiyoshi Hasegawa; Norihiro Kokudo
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 3.647

3.  Single Orifice Outflow Reconstruction: Refining the Venous Outflow in Modified Right Lobe Live Donor Liver Transplantation.

Authors:  Viniyendra Pamecha; Bramhadatta Pattnaik; Piyush Kumar Sinha; Nilesh Sadashiv Patil; Nihar Mohapatra; Shridhar Vasantrao Sasturkar; Venkatesh Balaraman Sundararajan; Shalini Thapar; Gaurav Sindwani; Mahesh Kumar Arora
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Increased Surgical Complications but Improved Overall Survival with Adult Living Donor Compared to Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Wei Tang; Jian-Guo Qiu; Yang Cai; Luo Cheng; Cheng-You Du
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Is there any correlation between liver graft regeneration and recipient's pretransplant skeletal muscle mass?-a study in extended left lobe graft living-donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  Riccardo Pravisani; Akihiko Soyama; Shinichiro Ono; Umberto Baccarani; Miriam Isola; Mitsuhisa Takatsuki; Masaaki Hidaka; Tomohiko Adachi; Takanobu Hara; Takashi Hamada; Florian Pecquenard; Andrea Risaliti; Susumu Eguchi
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 7.293

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.