Literature DB >> 25394913

A likelihood ratio test for nested proportions.

Yi-Fan Chen1, Jonathan G Yabes, Maria M Brooks, Sonia Singh, Lisa A Weissfeld.   

Abstract

For policy and medical issues, it is important to know if the proportion of an event changes after an intervention is administered. When the later proportion can only be calculated in a portion of the sample used to compute the previous proportion, the two proportions are nested. The motivating example for this work comes from the need to test whether admission rates in emergency departments are different between the first and a return visit. Here, subjects who contribute to the admission rate at the return visit must be included in the first rate and also return, but not vice versa. This conditionality means that existing methods, including the basic test of equality of two proportions, longitudinal data analysis methods, and recurrent event approaches are not directly applicable. Currently, researchers can only explore this question by the use of descriptive statistics. We propose a likelihood ratio test to compare two nested proportions by using the product of conditional probabilities. This test accommodates the conditionality, subject dependencies, and cluster effects and can be implemented in SAS PROC NLMIXED allowing for the proposed method to be readily used in an applied setting. Simulation studies showed that our approach provides unbiased estimates and reasonable power. Moreover, it generally outperforms the two-sample proportion z-test, in the presence of heterogeneity, and the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test. An example based on readmission rates through an emergency department is used to illustrate the proposed method.
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  likelihood ratio test; nested/conditional proportions; nonlinear mixed model

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25394913      PMCID: PMC4289453          DOI: 10.1002/sim.6363

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  4 in total

Review 1.  Proportions, odds, and risk.

Authors:  Christopher L Sistrom; Cynthia W Garvan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease.

Authors:  N MANTEL; W HAENSZEL
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1959-04       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Outcome-dependent sampling: an efficient sampling and inference procedure for studies with a continuous outcome.

Authors:  Haibo Zhou; Jianwei Chen; Tiina H Rissanen; Susan A Korrick; Howard Hu; Jukka T Salonen; Matthew P Longnecker
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.822

4.  Return visits to a pediatric emergency department.

Authors:  Evaline A Alessandrini; Jane M Lavelle; Stephanie M Grenfell; Cynthia R Jacobstein; Kathy N Shaw
Journal:  Pediatr Emerg Care       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.454

  4 in total
  1 in total

1.  Pilot serosurvey of Coxiella burnetii in domesticated small ruminants in the United Arab Emirates.

Authors:  Robert Barigye; Nabeeha Abdelgaleel D Hassan; Ibrahim M Abdalla-Alfaki; Hamda Khalfan Khamis Al Alawi; Afra Mohammed Balhayema Aldhaheri; Fatma Mohammed Ghanim; Maryam Ali Sumail Alkhateri; Nouf Saeed Ali Alalawi; Mohamed Elfatih H Mohamed; Khaja Mohteshamuddin
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 1.559

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.