Literature DB >> 25394314

Radiological improvements in global sagittal alignment after lumbar decompression without fusion.

Kengo Fujii1, Naohiro Kawamura, Masachika Ikegami, Gaku Niitsuma, Junichi Kunogi.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective, radiographical study.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate short-term radiological changes in sagittal alignment after lumbar decompression without fusion for lumbar canal stenosis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although the importance of global sagittal balance is underscored recently, little is known about the changes in sagittal alignment after lumbar canal decompression.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 88 patients who underwent lumbar decompression without fusion at a single institution between November 2008 and May 2013, with a minimum follow-up of 5 months. Standing radiographs at the preoperative period and the final follow-up were assessed. Radiological parameters included the sagittal vertical axis (SVA), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence (PI), occipital 7th cervical angle, and thoracic kyphosis, which were measured by 2 spine surgeons. The Zurich Claudication Questionnaire and visual analogue scale scores were obtained to assess the patient-based clinical outcomes.
RESULTS: Both LL and thoracic kyphosis significantly increased postoperatively, whereas SVA, PI-LL (PI minus LL), and pelvic tilt significantly decreased (P<0.05). There were no significant differences between the preoperative and postoperative occipital 7th cervical angle and PI. The amount of increment in LL was greater in patients with small preoperative LL. The improvement in SVA was greater in those with a large preoperative SVA. The Zurich Claudication Questionnaire and visual analogue scale scores showed no significant correlation with the radiological parameters.
CONCLUSION: Lumbar decompression without fusion can induce a reactive improvement in the lumbar and global sagittal alignment even if a sagittal imbalance exists preoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25394314     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000708

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  6 in total

Review 1.  Effect of lumbar laminectomy on spinal sagittal alignment: a systematic review.

Authors:  Juho Hatakka; Katri Pernaa; Juho Rantakokko; Inari Laaksonen; Mikhail Saltychev
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Factors associated with low back pain in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Izaya Ogon; Atsushi Teramoto; Hiroyuki Takashima; Yoshinori Terashima; Mitsunori Yoshimoto; Makoto Emori; Kousuke Iba; Tsuneo Takebayashi; Toshihiko Yamashita
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 2.562

Review 3.  Focal disorders of the spine with compensatory deformities: how to define them.

Authors:  Andrea Redaelli; Pedro Berjano; Max Aebi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Critical Review of Alignment and Balance.

Authors:  Matthias Pumberger; Hendrik Schmidt; Michael Putzier
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2018-07-27

5.  Effects of preoperative sagittal spinal imbalance on pain after lateral lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Akihiko Hiyama; Hiroyuki Katoh; Daisuke Sakai; Masato Sato; Masahiko Watanabe
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  The challenge of measuring spinopelvic parameters: inter-rater reliability before and after minimally invasive lumbar spondylodesis.

Authors:  Marc Hohenhaus; Florian Volz; Yorn Merz; Ralf Watzlawick; Christoph Scholz; Ulrich Hubbe; Jan-Helge Klingler
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 2.362

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.