Literature DB >> 25394101

HIV infection early diagnosis experience in primary care.

Francisco Jover Diaz1, Paz Ortega2, Pedro Antequera3, Blas Cloquell4, Marta Alcaraz5, Mavi Hernandis4, Carlos Nuñez5, Rosario Lloret4, Faustino Perez5, Sabina Jover Perez5, Fernando Buñuel3, Francisco Gomez2, Marta Sanz5, Rafael Ordovas5, Francisco Torregrosa4, Angela Barceló4, Consuelo Masegosa6, Victoria Ortiz de la Tabla3, Jose María Cuadrado1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Traditional screening system focus on classic risk factors "lost" a substantial proportion of HIV-infected patients. Several organizations such as CDC or USPS Task Force favour universal screening for HIV infection for good cost-effectiveness profile. In a previous study prevalence of HIV infection in patients attending our infectious diseases department was high (5.4%).
OBJECTIVE: To determine prevalence of HIV infection in patients aged 20-55 years in primary care (PC).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A propsective observational study was undertaken between February and June 2013. We performed a screening of HIV infection type "Opt-out" (offering voluntary rejection) in 4 PC centers (32 Physicians) in San Juan-Alicante. Sample size (n=318) for a prevalence of 1% and a confidence level of 97% was calculated. Nevertheless, other PC physician not recruiting patients performed HIV testing according clinical risk factors.
RESULTS: HIV testing was offered to 508 patients. Mean age 38.9±10 years (58.5% female). Overall, 430 (83.8%) agreed to participate. Finally, 368 patients (71.7% of total) were tested for HIV. No patient had a positive result (100% ELISA HIV negative). However, following clinical practice, 3 patients were diagnosed of HIV in the same period by non-recruiting physicians. In 2 cases, serology was performed at the patient's request and in one case by constitutional syndrome. The 3 patients were MSM.
CONCLUSIONS: 1) In our study, we detected no new cases of HIV infection through universal screening. 2) Our screened population could be lower-risk because of high percentage of women included (58.5%). 3) Performing HIV opt-in screening (clinical practice), we detected 3 cases in the same period, all having HIV risk factors (MSM). 4) These results suggest that opt-out screening should be developed in high-risk populations. It is still to be determined what is the best screening strategy in low-risk populations such as ours.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 25394101      PMCID: PMC4224898          DOI: 10.7448/IAS.17.4.19597

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Int AIDS Soc        ISSN: 1758-2652            Impact factor:   5.396


  2 in total

1.  Opt-out testing for blood-borne viruses in primary care: a multicentre, prospective study.

Authors:  Mark O'Kelly; David Byrne; Edward Naughten; Colm Bergin; Caroline Williams
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  HIV testing strategies employed in health care settings in the European Union/European Economic Area (EU/EEA): evidence from a systematic review.

Authors:  S Desai; L Tavoschi; A K Sullivan; L Combs; D Raben; V Delpech; S F Jakobsen; A J Amato-Gauci; S Croxford
Journal:  HIV Med       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 3.180

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.