| Literature DB >> 25393806 |
Ursula Rochau1,2, Gaby Sroczynski1, Dominik Wolf3,4, Stefan Schmidt3, Beate Jahn1, Martina Kluibenschaedl1, Annette Conrads-Frank1, David Stenehjem5,6, Diana Brixner1,2,5, Jerald Radich7, Günther Gastl3, Uwe Siebert1,2,8,9.
Abstract
Several tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are approved for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) therapy. We evaluated the long-term cost-effectiveness of seven sequential therapy regimens for CML in Austria. A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed using a state-transition Markov model. As model parameters, we used published trial data, clinical, epidemiological and economic data from the Austrian CML registry and national databases. We performed a cohort simulation over a life-long time-horizon from a societal perspective. Nilotinib without second-line TKI yielded an incremental cost-utility ratio of 121,400 €/quality-adjusted life year (QALY) compared to imatinib without second-line TKI after imatinib failure. Imatinib followed by nilotinib after failure resulted in 131,100 €/QALY compared to nilotinib without second-line TKI. Nilotinib followed by dasatinib yielded 152,400 €/QALY compared to imatinib followed by nilotinib after failure. Remaining strategies were dominated. The sequential application of TKIs is standard-of-care, and thus, our analysis points toward imatinib followed by nilotinib as the most cost-effective strategy.Entities:
Keywords: Chronic myeloid leukemia; cost-effectiveness analysis; decision analysis; decision-analytic model; health economic modeling; tyrosine kinase inhibitors
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25393806 DOI: 10.3109/10428194.2014.982635
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Leuk Lymphoma ISSN: 1026-8022