Iury Castro1, José Valladares-Neto2, Carlos Estrela3. 1. a PhD student, private practice, Goiânia, Brazil. 2. b Professor, Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Brazil. 3. c Professor and Chairman, Department of Stomatologic Science, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Brazil.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether root-filled teeth are similar to vital pulp teeth in terms of apical root resorption (ARR) after orthodontic treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An original sample of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of 1256 roots from 30 orthodontic patients were analyzed. The inclusion criteria demanded root-filled teeth and their contralateral vital teeth, while teeth with history of trauma had to be excluded to comply with exclusion criteria. CBCT images of root-filled teeth were compared before and after orthodontic treatment in a split-mouth design study. Tooth measurements were made with multiplanar reconstruction using axial-guided navigation. The statistical difference between the treatment effects was compared using the paired t-test. RESULTS: Twenty posterior root-filled teeth and their contralaterals with vital pulp were selected before orthodontic treatment from six adolescents (two boys and four girls; mean [SD] age 12.8 [1.8] years). No differences were detected between filled and vital root lengths before treatment (P = .4364). The mean differences in root length between preorthodontic and postorthodontic treatment in filled- and vital roots were -0.30 mm and -0.16 mm, respectively, without any statistical difference (P = .4197) between them. CONCLUSION: There appears to be no increase in ARR after orthodontic treatment in root-filled teeth with no earlier ARR.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether root-filled teeth are similar to vital pulp teeth in terms of apical root resorption (ARR) after orthodontic treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An original sample of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of 1256 roots from 30 orthodontic patients were analyzed. The inclusion criteria demanded root-filled teeth and their contralateral vital teeth, while teeth with history of trauma had to be excluded to comply with exclusion criteria. CBCT images of root-filled teeth were compared before and after orthodontic treatment in a split-mouth design study. Tooth measurements were made with multiplanar reconstruction using axial-guided navigation. The statistical difference between the treatment effects was compared using the paired t-test. RESULTS: Twenty posterior root-filled teeth and their contralaterals with vital pulp were selected before orthodontic treatment from six adolescents (two boys and four girls; mean [SD] age 12.8 [1.8] years). No differences were detected between filled and vital root lengths before treatment (P = .4364). The mean differences in root length between preorthodontic and postorthodontic treatment in filled- and vital roots were -0.30 mm and -0.16 mm, respectively, without any statistical difference (P = .4197) between them. CONCLUSION: There appears to be no increase in ARR after orthodontic treatment in root-filled teeth with no earlier ARR.
Authors: Liviu Feller; Razia A G Khammissa; George Thomadakis; Jeanine Fourie; Johan Lemmer Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2016-03-29 Impact factor: 3.411