| Literature DB >> 25393738 |
Yuan Jiang1, Wentao Zhang2, Mingchang Wang3, Muyi Kang3, Manyu Dong4.
Abstract
North-Central China is a region in which the air temperature has clearly increased for several decades. Picea meyeri and Larix principis-rupprechtii are the most dominant co-occurring tree species within the cold coniferous forest belt ranging vertically from 1800 m to 2800 m a.s.l. in this region. Based on a tree-ring analysis of 292 increment cores sampled from 146 trees at different elevations, this study aimed to examine if the radial growth of the two species in response to climate is similar, whether the responses are consistent along altitudinal gradients and which species might be favored in the future driven by the changing climate. The results indicated the following: (1) The two species grew in different rhythms at low and high elevation respectively; (2) Both species displayed inconsistent relationships between radial growth and climate data along altitudinal gradients. The correlation between radial growth and the monthly mean temperature in the spring or summer changed from negative at low elevation into positive at high elevation, whereas those between the radial growth and the total monthly precipitation displayed a change from positive into negative along the elevation gradient. These indicate the different influences of the horizontal climate and vertical mountainous climate on the radial growth of the two species; (3) The species-dependent different response to climate in radial growth appeared mainly in autumn of the previous year. The radial growth of L. principis-rupprechtii displayed negative responses both to temperature and to precipitation in the previous September, October or November, which was not observed in the radial growth of P. meyeri. (4) The radial growth of both species will tend to be increased at high elevation and limited at low elevation, and L. principis-rupprechtii might be more favored in the future, if the temperature keeps rising.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25393738 PMCID: PMC4231039 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112537
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Location and climate survey of the study area.
Geographic location and forest stand characteristics of the sampling sites.
| SiteCode | Longitude(E) | Latitude(N) | Elevation(m a.s.l.) | Slope | Density(Stems ha−1) | AverageDBHa of | AverageDBHa of | AverageHeightb of | AverageHeightb of |
|
| 38.78° | 111.91° | 1970 | 28° | 450 | 10.7±0.9 | 8.9±1.0 | 5.2±0.4 | 5.0±0.4 |
|
| 38.75° | 111.91° | 2240 | 25° | 317 | 18.4±0.8 | 24.6±3.1 | 12.5±0.5 | 17.8±2.8 |
|
| 38.73° | 111.88° | 2490 | 20° | 608 | 15.3±0.5 | 20.6±2.3 | 10.4±0.2 | 14.1±1.6 |
|
| 38.72° | 111.85° | 2650 | 20° | 608 | 17.3±0.7 | 15.9±1.0 | 10.0±0.3 | 8.8±0.7 |
Data are presented as mean ± SE.
Statistical parameters of each chronology.
| Chronologies | Sample depth | Time period | MS | R | SNR | EPS |
|
| 40/20 | 1970–2007 | 0.25 | 0.51 | 10.5 | 0.91 |
|
| 30/15 | 1917–2007 | 0.16 | 0.58 | 34.3 | 0.97 |
|
| 42/21 | 1897–2007 | 0.17 | 0.45 | 26.4 | 0.96 |
|
| 34/17 | 1947–2007 | 0.17 | 0.43 | 25.8 | 0.96 |
|
| 42/21 | 1969–2007 | 0.16 | 0.25 | 7.3 | 0.88 |
|
| 30/15 | 1924–2007 | 0.17 | 0.49 | 21.7 | 0.96 |
|
| 42/21 | 1940–2007 | 0.15 | 0.66 | 57.4 | 0.98 |
|
| 32/16 | 1947–2007 | 0.16 | 0.57 | 38.1 | 0.97 |
| p-values resulted in one-way ANOVA on theparameters between two species | 0.245 | 0.911 | 0.626 | 0.705 | ||
MS, mean sensitivity; R, inter-series correlation; SNR, signal to noise ratio; EPS, the expressed population signal; the R, SNR and EPS were all calculated for the common period, 1978–2007. P1, P2, P3, P4, the chronologies of P. meyeri in the lowest, the lower, the higher and the highest sites, respectively; L1, L2, L3, L4, the chronologies of L. principis-rupprechtii in the lowest, the lower, the higher and the highest sites, respectively.
Pearson’s correlation coefficients between each pair of chronologies.
| L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | P1 | P2 | P3 | P4 | |
|
| −0.290 | −0.102 | −0.109 | 0.528** | 0.083 | −0.214 | −0.209 | |
|
| 0.686** | 0.619** | −0.549** | 0.100 | 0.256 | 0.303 | ||
|
| . | 0.783** | −0.496** | 0.124 | 0.507** | 0.519** | ||
|
| −0.495** | 0.153 | 0.501** | 0.538** | ||||
|
| 0.003 | −0.362 | −0.459 | |||||
|
| 0.285 | 0.293 | ||||||
|
| 0.762** | |||||||
|
|
* and ** indicate the significant levels of 0.05 and 0.01, respectively; P1, P2, P3, P4, represent the chronologies of P. meyeri in the lowest, the lower, the higher and the highest sites, respectively; L1, L2, L3, L4 represent the chronologies of L. principis-rupprechtii in the lowest, the lower, the higher and the highest sites, respectively; the correlations are based on the common period 1978–2007.
Figure 2Results from correlation analyses on tree-ring width indices with monthly meteorological data.
The dashed lines indicate a significance level of 0.05. r and p at the top left represent the correlation coefficients between the two data series in each field and the corresponding significance level. This level indicates the similarity of the growth-climate relationship between two species.
Figure 3Trends in tree-ring indices of two species using a three-year average.
The black lines represent trends of P. meyeri, whereas the grey lines represent those of L. principis-rupprechtii.
Figure 4Trends of annual mean temperature and total yearly precipitation in the study area.