Literature DB >> 25393339

Novel Clinical Scale for Evaluating Pre-Operative Risk of Cerebral Herniation from Traumatic Epidural Hematoma.

Hong Lin1, Wen-Hao Wang1, Lian-Shui Hu1, Jun Li1, Fei Luo1, Jun-Ming Lin1, Wei Huang1, Ming-Sheng Zhang1, Yuan Zhang1, Kang Hu1, Jian-Xian Zheng1.   

Abstract

Secondary massive cerebral infarction (MCI) is the predominant prognostic factor for cerebral herniation from epidural hematoma (EDH) and determines the need for decompressive craniectomy. In this study, we tested the clinical feasibility and reliability of a novel pre-operative risk scoring system, the EDH-MCI scale, to guide surgical decision making. It is comprised of six risk factors, including hematoma location and volume, duration and extent of cerebral herniation, Glasgow Coma Scale score, and presence of preoperative shock, with a total score ranging from 0 to 18 points. Application of the EDH-MCI scale to guide surgical modalities for initial hematoma evacuation surgery for 65 patients (prospective cohort, 2012.02-2014.01) showed a significant improvement in the accuracy of the selected modality (95.38% vs. 77.95%; p = 0.002) relative to the results for an independent set of 126 patients (retrospective cohort, 2007.01-2012.01) for whom surgical modalities were decided empirically. Results suggested that simple hematoma evacuation craniotomy was sufficient for patients with low risk scores (≤9 points), whereas decompressive craniectomy in combination with duraplasty were necessary only for those with high risk scores (≥13 points). In patients with borderline risk scores (10-12 points), those having unstable vital signs, coexistence of severe secondary brainstem injury, and unresponsive dilated pupils after emergent burr hole hematoma drainage had a significantly increased incidence of post-traumatic MCI and necessity of radical surgical treatments. In conclusion, the novel pre-operative risk EDH-MCI evaluation scale has a satisfactory predictive and discriminative performance for patients who are at risk for the development of secondary MCI and therefore require decompressive craniectomy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical scale; decompressive craniectomy; epidural hematoma; massive cerebral infarction; risk evaluation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 25393339     DOI: 10.1089/neu.2014.3656

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurotrauma        ISSN: 0897-7151            Impact factor:   5.269


  2 in total

1.  Comparative effectiveness of different surgical procedures for traumatic acute epidural haematoma: study protocol for Prospective, Observational Real-world Treatments of AEDH in Large-scale Surgical Cases (PORTALS-AEDH).

Authors:  Chun Yang; Jiyuan Hui; Li Xie; Junfeng Feng; Jiyao Jiang
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Prospective Randomized Evaluation of Decompressive Ipsilateral Craniectomy for Traumatic Acute Epidural Hematoma (PREDICT-AEDH): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Chun Yang; Xianjian Huang; Junfeng Feng; Li Xie; Jiyuan Hui; Weiping Li; Jiyao Jiang
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 2.279

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.