Literature DB >> 25393028

A Dyadic Perspective on Speech Accommodation and Social Connection: Both Partners' Rejection Sensitivity Matters.

Lauren Aguilar1, Geraldine Downey2, Robert Krauss2, Jennifer Pardo3, Sean Lane4, Niall Bolger2.   

Abstract

Findings from confederate paradigms predict that mimicry is an adaptive route to social connection for rejection-sensitive individuals (Lakin, Chartrand, & Arkin, 2008). However, dyadic perspectives predict that whether mimicry leads to perceived connection depends on the rejection sensitivity (RS) of both partners in an interaction. We investigated these predictions in 50 college women who completed a dyadic cooperative task in which members were matched or mismatched in being dispositionally high or low in RS. We used a psycholinguistics paradigm to assess, through independent listeners' judgments (N = 162), how much interacting individuals accommodate phonetic aspects of their speech toward each other. Results confirmed predictions from confederate paradigms in matched RS dyads. However, mismatched dyads showed an asymmetry in levels of accommodation and perceived connection: Those high in RS accommodated more than their low-RS partner but emerged feeling less connected. Mediational analyses indicated that low-RS individuals' nonaccommodation in mismatched dyads helped explain their high-RS partners' relatively low perceived connection to them. Establishing whether mimicry is an adaptive route to social connection requires analyzing mimicry as a dyadic process influenced by the needs of each dyad member.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25393028      PMCID: PMC4430452          DOI: 10.1111/jopy.12149

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers        ISSN: 0022-3506


  23 in total

1.  Rejection sensitivity and adolescent girls' vulnerability to relationship-centered difficulties.

Authors:  V Purdie; G Downey
Journal:  Child Maltreat       Date:  2000-11

Review 2.  Interdependence, interaction, and relationships.

Authors:  Caryl E Rusbult; Paul A M Van Lange
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2002-10-04       Impact factor: 24.137

3.  Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations.

Authors:  Patrick E Shrout; Niall Bolger
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2002-12

Review 4.  Rejection sensitivity and the rejection-hostility link in romantic relationships.

Authors:  Rainer Romero-Canyas; Geraldine Downey; Kathy Berenson; Ozlem Ayduk; N Jan Kang
Journal:  J Pers       Date:  2010-02

5.  Paying to belong: when does rejection trigger ingratiation?

Authors:  Rainer Romero-Canyas; Geraldine Downey; Kavita S Reddy; Sylvia Rodriguez; Timothy J Cavanaugh; Rosemary Pelayo
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2010-11

6.  A nonverbal signal in voices of interview partners effectively predicts communication accommodation and social status perceptions.

Authors:  S W Gregory; S Webster
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1996-06

Review 7.  Language in dialogue: when confederates might be hazardous to your data.

Authors:  Anna K Kuhlen; Susan E Brennan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-02

8.  The role of fundamental frequency in phonetic accommodation.

Authors:  Molly Babel; Dasha Bulatov
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.500

9.  Implications of rejection sensitivity for intimate relationships.

Authors:  G Downey; S I Feldman
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1996-06

10.  After All I Have Done For You: Self-silencing Accommodations Fuel Women's Post-Rejection Hostility.

Authors:  Rainer Romero-Canyas; Kavita S Reddy; Sylvia Rodriguez; Geraldine Downey
Journal:  J Exp Soc Psychol       Date:  2013-07-01
View more
  2 in total

1.  Vocal alignment to native and non-native speakers of English.

Authors:  Eva M Lewandowski; Lynne C Nygaard
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Speaking to a common tune: Between-speaker convergence in voice fundamental frequency in a joint speech production task.

Authors:  Vincent Aubanel; Noël Nguyen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.