Literature DB >> 25392743

Rationale for Using Social Media to Collect Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients with Celiac Disease.

Kt Park1, Merissa Harris2, Nasim Khavari3, Chaitan Khosla2.   

Abstract

Patients with celiac disease (CD) are increasingly interconnected through social media, exchanging patient experiences and health-tracking information between individuals through various web-based platforms. Social media represents potentially unique communication interface between gastroenterologists and active social media users - especially young adults and adolescents with celiac disease-regarding adherence to the strict gluten-free diet, gastrointestinal symptoms, and meaningful discussion about disease management. Yet, various social media platforms may be underutilized for research purposes to collect patient-reported outcomes data. In this commentary, we summarize the scientific rationale and potential for future growth of social media in patient-reported outcomes research, focusing on college freshmen with celiac disease as a case study and provide overview of the methodological approach. Finally, we discuss how social media may impact patient care in the future through increasing mobile technology use.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Facebook; Healthcare; Mobile technology; Patient-reported outcomes; Quality-of-life; Social media; Social networking

Year:  2014        PMID: 25392743      PMCID: PMC4226063          DOI: 10.4172/2161-069X.1000166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Dig Syst


The Case for Social Media in Patient-Reported Outcomes Research

In this age of social media woven into the fabric of our technology-driven world, today’s physicians are re-examining established ideals of patient privacy and professionalism [1,2]. While the rise of social media within patient care raises real concerns, web-based applications – such as Facebook, Twitter, Google+, Doximity, web blogs, instant messaging platforms, and video chat – represent a growing medium for patients to interact with other patients and social media-savvy health care providers. In gastroenterology, the online celiac disease (CD) community is the largest and most established network of patients exchanging ideas and experiences [3,4]. Within reasonable organizational frameworks, the collective voice from the celiac community aims to raise awareness about important health policy issues affecting CD patients, such as dietary adherence to the gluten-free diet and the current dilemma of under diagnosing patients with silent CD [5,6]. Under the auspices of marketing strategy, researchers are gleaning abundant personal information about patients through social media – to no one’s surprise. Yet, physician-led research is slowly acclimating to this new approach to collecting patient-reported data, although some investigators are increasingly open to new ways of collecting data through social media [4,5]. Physicians and researchers in gastroenterology could benefit from a wealth of possibilities through conducting systematic research through online sources. Facebook, for instance, has more than 1 billion active users worldwide who spend nearly an hour online every day [6]. Evidence suggests that the majority of patients want their healthcare providers to incorporate social media in some patient care, including appointment scheduling and reminders, diagnostic test reporting, health information sharing, prescription notifications, and answering general questions [7,8]. In particular, since the average adolescent and young adult patient’s social media use is widely prevalent and willingness to engage providers through social media is generally favorable, our group hypothesized those biopsy-confirmed CD patients in this demographics may be an optimal group to perform a survey study using Facebook.

Our Pilot Experience Collecting Patient Reported-Outcomes on Facebook

Based on visible interest from private biotechnology companies for clinical trials [9] and the National Institutes of Health [10], electronically-collected patient-reported outcomes (PROs) research is arguably one of the promising areas for future growth in clinical research. Given this background, our research group undertook an exploratory initiative using Facebook. Using our celiac center’s Facebook page (https://www.facebook.com/CeliacDiseaseLPCH), our research group successfully generated de-identified, longitudinal patient data from CD patients. We were granted institutional IRB approval for this prospective, cross-sectional pilot study. Over a 6 month study period, we collected approximately 150 separate survey responses from 32 college freshmen – 16 with CD and 16 age- and gender-matched healthy controls [9]. We aimed to assess changes in quality-of-life (QOL) and CD-related health due to difficulty adhering to a strict GFD during the first semester of college through 3 validated health surveys. At the end of our study, we saw no statistical difference in the QOL or overall health between the two groups. However, our notion was confirmed that de-identified databases for research were possible and reproducible by using Facebook as the primary portal for study participation. Guiding principles of clinical research applies in-person and in social media. The planning phase is of utmost importance. We found 19 private or institutional celiac groups with an established presence on Facebook, as shown in Table 1 with each group’s total “Likes.” By contacting these groups through Facebook, information about our study was disseminated on many of the organizations’ Facebook page, and they often voluntarily generated separate web-based announcements, listserv emails, and other social media attention (e.g., Twitter) about our initiative. We adhered to a formal patient enrollment process and timeline, where posted electronic surveys on our Facebook page were used to determine study eligibility of potential participants [10]. HIPAA-compliant electronic surveys generated from an institutional survey tool (e.g., Qualtrics) are recommended. Whenever possible, as with any patient-oriented research, privacy and protection of patient-health information must take priority.
Table 1

Facebook Celiac Groups with “Likes” count as of April 9, 2013.

OrganizationWeb Location#Facebook Likes(43,709 total)
National Celiac Foundationhttp://www.facebook.com/NFCeliacAwareness20,203 likes
Celiac Disease Foundationhttp://www.facebook.com/CeliacDiseaseFoundation13,742 likes
Univ of Chicago Celiac Disease Centerhttp://www.facebook.com/CureCeliac?ref=pb12,740 likes
Gluten Intolerance Group of N. Amhttp://www.facebook.com/GlutenIntoleranceGroup?ref=pb8,404 likes
Center for Celiac Researchhttp://www.facebook.com/pages/Center-for-Celiac-Research/1287988004073,518 likes
Celiac Sprue Associationhttp://www.facebook.com/csaceliacs3,265 likes
Celiac Diseasehttp://www.facebook.com/pages/Celiac-Disease/129385497604?ref=pb2,531 likes
American Celiac Disease Alliancehttp://www.facebook.com/AmericanCeliacAlliance1,792 likes
About Celiac Diseasehttp://www.facebook.com/pages/Aboutcom-Celiac-Disease/232137674391,494 likes
Gluten Free Bayhttp://www.facebook.com/pages/Gluten-Free-Bay/22172143920?ref=pb1,413 likes
Celiac Support Group at Boston Children’s Hospitalhttp://www.facebook.com/ChildrensCeliac?ref=pb958 likes
g-free kidshttp://www.facebook.com/gfreekid?ref=pb656 likes
Gluten Free Kidshttp://www.facebook.com/GFKblog?ref=pb1,207 likes
The Gluten Free Student Cookbookhttp://www.facebook.com/pages/The-Gluten-Free-Student-Cookbook/149325515133908?ref=pb377 likes
Teens living with Celiachttp://www.facebook.com/TeensLivingwithCeliac?ref=pb146 likes
Gluten Free College girlhttp://www.facebook.com/pages/Gluten-Free-College-Girl/153799871335842138 likes
Udi’s Gluten Free College Ambasasdorshttp://www.facebook.com/pages/Udis-Gluten-Free-College-Ambassadors/17820726228616692 likes
North Bay Celiac Grouphttp://www.facebook.com/NorthBayCeliacs74 likes
Gluten Free College Kidhttp://www.facebook.com/pages/The-Gluten-Free-College-Kid/22961608375294154 likes

Mobile Meets Value-Based Care and Patient-Reported Outcomes

There is a gradual but real momentum in clinical research to use PROs whenever possible. Health care is moving towards a value-based system, where improving patient-reported outcomes – such as QOL – are benchmarks of good clinical practice [11]. Therefore, clinical research naturally follows suite. Forward-thinking researchers can keep pace with this trend by realizing that the public has a natural demand for web-based modalities to facilitate patient care and research, especially on mobile devices. Celiac disease patients already utilizing daily social media use, especially among the adolescent and young adult patient population, represent an opportunity for clinician investigators in gastroenterology to gather valuable PROs. Nearly 75% of all teens across all demographics use the internet from their mobile devices, and the majority of their total internet use is mobile [12]. There are approximately 7,000 (and growing) mobile healthcare applications in the Apple iTunes Healthcare Room. The future of social media seems to have a good foundation in mobile to effectively change the standard face-to-face and paper-trail methods of health care delivery. While increasing public demand will continue to upgrade the provider-patient experience and patient-advocacy interface of social media, effective methods of collecting PROs, on the other hand, may require more systematic collective thinking and future consensus.
  10 in total

1.  Reinventing clinical trials.

Authors:  Malorye Allison
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  Reengineering US health care.

Authors:  Ari Hoffman; Ezekiel J Emanuel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  Social media and clinical care: ethical, professional, and social implications.

Authors:  Katherine C Chretien; Terry Kind
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Who gives a tweet: assessing patients' interest in the use of social media for health care.

Authors:  Jennifer Fisher; Margaret Clayton
Journal:  Worldviews Evid Based Nurs       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 2.931

5.  Privacy, professionalism and Facebook: a dilemma for young doctors.

Authors:  Joanna MacDonald; Sangsu Sohn; Pete Ellis
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 6.251

6.  Equivalence of electronic and paper-and-pencil administration of patient-reported outcome measures: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Chad J Gwaltney; Alan L Shields; Saul Shiffman
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.725

7.  Take two aspirin and tweet me in the morning: how Twitter, Facebook, and other social media are reshaping health care.

Authors:  Carleen Hawn
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.301

8.  Medical professionalism in the age of online social networking.

Authors:  J S Guseh; R W Brendel; D H Brendel
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.903

9.  Can consumers trust web-based information about celiac disease? Accuracy, comprehensiveness, transparency, and readability of information on the internet.

Authors:  Shawna L McNally; Michael C Donohue; Kimberly P Newton; Sandra P Ogletree; Kristen K Conner; Sarah E Ingegneri; Martin F Kagnoff
Journal:  Interact J Med Res       Date:  2012-04-04

10.  Can patients really make an informed choice? An evaluation of the availability of online information about consultant surgeons in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Sarkhell Saadi Radha; Nick Caplan; Alan St Clair Gibson; Michael Shenouda; Sujith Konan; Deiary Kader
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 2.692

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  Symptom clusters in women with breast cancer: an analysis of data from social media and a research study.

Authors:  Sarah A Marshall; Christopher C Yang; Qing Ping; Mengnan Zhao; Nancy E Avis; Edward H Ip
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-10-17       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Social media usage pattern and its influencing factors among celiac patients and their families.

Authors:  Ahmed Al Sarkhy
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.485

Review 3.  Non-celiac wheat sensitivity: rationality and irrationality of a gluten-free diet in individuals affected with non-celiac disease: a review.

Authors:  Consolato Sergi; Vincenzo Villanacci; Antonio Carroccio
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.067

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.