Literature DB >> 25392279

The midpoint of sleep on working days: a measure for chronodisruption and its association to individuals' well-being.

Camila Morelatto de Souza1, Maria Paz Loayza Hidalgo.   

Abstract

There is consistent evidence suggesting a relationship between individuals' sleep-wake rhythms and well-being. The indiscriminate demands from daily working routines, which do not respect this individual physiological rhythm, might be mediating this phenomenon. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the relationship between the characteristics of sleep routines during working days and psychological well-being. This was a cross-sectional study on 825 individuals from rural communities from southern Brazil. The study protocol included a questionnaire on demographic characteristics, working routines, health complaints, and habits; the Munich Chronotype Questionnaire for sleep-wake rhythm and; the WHO-Five well-being index. Since sex has been shown to affect sleep circadian rhythm and well-being, analysis was performed on men and women separately. In the proposed hierarchical regression models, different factors contributed to well-being according to sex. Among men, sleep-wake and work-related variables did not predict well-being scores. Among women, later midpoints of sleep on working days (B = -1.243, SE B = 0.315, β = -0.220), working more days per week (B = -1.507, SE B = 0.494, β = 0.150), having longer working journeys (B = -0.293, SE B = 0.105, β = -0.166), earlier working journey midpoints (B = 0.465, SE B = 0.222, β = 0.115), and being exposed to less sunlight (B = 0.140, SE B = 0.064, β = 0.103) predicted worse well-being. For the subgroup of women with days free from work, we have found a correlation between later midpoints of sleep during the week with worse well-being (Pearson's r = -0.159, p = 0.045) while the same relationship was not significantly observed with the midpoint of sleep on non-working days (Pearson's r = -0.153, p = 0.054). Considering WHO-Five as categorical, based on proposed clinical cut-offs, among women working 7-d/week, those with worst well-being (WHO-Five < 13) had the latest midpoint of sleep (F = 4.514, p = 0.012). Thus, the midpoint of sleep on working days represents the interaction between individuals' sleep-wake behavior and working routines. It plays an important role as a stress factor and may be a useful alternative variable related to chronodisruption.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronotype; circadian typology; entrainment; midpoint of sleep on workdays; sunlight; well-being; working schedule

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25392279     DOI: 10.3109/07420528.2014.979941

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chronobiol Int        ISSN: 0742-0528            Impact factor:   2.877


  9 in total

1.  Chronotypes, night shifts and intensive care.

Authors:  Andrew C Argent; Julie Benbenishty; Hans Flaatten
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Actigraphy-Based Assessment of Sleep Parameters.

Authors:  Desta Fekedulegn; Michael E Andrew; Mingming Shi; John M Violanti; Sarah Knox; Kim E Innes
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 2.179

3.  Prevalence and Correlates of Insufficient Sleep Syndrome in Japanese Young Adults: A Web-Based Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Yuko Morita; Taeko Sasai-Sakuma; Shoichi Asaoka; Yuichi Inoue
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 4.062

4.  Pulling the covers in electronic health records for an association study with self-reported sleep behaviors.

Authors:  Seth D Rhoades; Lisa Bastarache; Joshua C Denny; Jacob J Hughey
Journal:  Chronobiol Int       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 2.877

5.  Associations of midpoint of sleep and night sleep duration with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Chinese rural population: the Henan rural cohort study.

Authors:  Zhihan Zhai; Xiaotian Liu; Haiqing Zhang; Xiaokang Dong; Yaling He; Miaomiao Niu; Mingming Pan; Chongjian Wang; Xiaoqiong Wang; Yuqian Li
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Work routines moderate the association between eveningness and poor psychological well-being.

Authors:  Felipe Gutiérrez Carvalho; Camila Morelatto de Souza; Maria Paz Loayza Hidalgo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Identifying shift worker chronotype: implications for health.

Authors:  Beverly M Hittle; Gordon L Gillespie
Journal:  Ind Health       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 2.179

8.  Chronotype and psychological distress among Chinese rural population: A moderated mediation model of sleep quality and age.

Authors:  Tianya Hou; Fan Zhang; Xiaofei Mao; Guanghui Deng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Sleep-wake circadian rhythm pattern in young adults by actigraphy during social isolation.

Authors:  Dora Zulema Romero Díaz; Maria Beatriz Duarte Gavião
Journal:  Sleep Sci       Date:  2022 Jan-Mar
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.