Literature DB >> 25391787

Occupational health physicians have better work conditions for handling sickness certification compared with general practitioners: results from a nationwide survey in Sweden.

Therese Ljungquist1, Kristina Alexanderson2, Linnea Kjeldgård2, Britt Arrelöv3, Gunnar H Nilsson4.   

Abstract

AIMS: To study whether occupational health physicians (OPs) have a better work situation regarding handling of sickness certification compared with other physicians, in particular general practitioners (GPs), and to analyze associations between OPs' experiences of assessing and providing a long-term prognosis of patients' work capacity and some potentially interrelated factors.
METHODS: Answers to a nationwide survey from physicians who had sickness certification consultations at least once monthly were analyzed. Differences among OPs (n=481), GPs (n=4257) and physicians working in other clinical settings (n=9452) were estimated by chi square tests. Associations between OPs' experiences as above and potentially interrelated factors were estimated using logistic regression analyses.
RESULTS: Among OPs, a lower proportion experienced clinical work situations related to sickness certifications as 'very problematic', compared with the other physicians, and especially so compared with GPs. A higher proportion of OPs also had organizational support for handling sickness certifications. For OPs, experience of sickness certification consultations as problematic once a month or less often, not experiencing sickness certification tasks as a work environment problem, and having a well-established workplace policy regarding sickness certification matters were significantly positively associated with finding assessing and providing a long-term prognosis of work capacity as 'not at all/somewhat problematic'.
CONCLUSIONS: OPs' work situation regarding sickness certifications was favorable compared with that of other physicians, and especially compared with that of GPS. Our results underline the importance of organizational support for ensuring physicians' experience of having professional competence in handling assessments of patients' work capacity.
© 2014 the Nordic Societies of Public Health.

Entities:  

Keywords:  General practice; general practitioner; insurance medicine; occupational health physician; physician; sick leave; sickness certification

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25391787     DOI: 10.1177/1403494814558151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Public Health        ISSN: 1403-4948            Impact factor:   3.021


  5 in total

Review 1.  Working Conditions of Occupational Physicians-A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Eva Eisch; Paulina Kuper; Lara Lindert; Kyung-Eun Anna Choi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  Improved recording of work relatedness during patient consultations in occupational primary health care: a cluster randomized controlled trial using routine data.

Authors:  Salla Atkins; Tiia Reho; Nina Talola; Markku Sumanen; Mervi Viljamaa; Jukka Uitti
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 2.279

3.  Physician's use of sickness certification guidelines: a nationwide survey of 13 750 physicians in different types of clinics in Sweden.

Authors:  Veronica Svärd; Kristina Alexanderson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Evaluation of a guidelines implementation intervention to reduce work disability and sick leaves related to chronic musculoskeletal pain: a theory-informed qualitative study in occupational health care.

Authors:  Ritva Horppu; Ari Väänänen; Johanna Kausto
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Problems with sickness certification tasks: experiences from physicians in different clinical settings. A cross-sectional nationwide study in Sweden.

Authors:  Therese Ljungquist; Elin Hinas; Gunnar H Nilsson; Catharina Gustavsson; Britt Arrelöv; Kristina Alexanderson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.655

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.