A first isolation of border disease virus (BDV) in Japan was from a pig on a farm without keeping any ruminants. Our previous study showed that this BDV, termed the FNK2012-1 strain, replicated inefficiently in swine-derived cells compared with those of ruminant origin. Pigs inoculated with this virus showed neither clinical symptoms nor viremia. In this study, we evaluated the pathogenicity of the FNK2012-1 strain in sheep, its natural host. The inoculated sheep showed clinical symptoms and transient viremia. Seroconversion was observed in the inoculated sheep. These results suggest that the FNK2012-1 strain was introduced from sheep and has not yet adapted to swine. Therefore, surveillance of border disease in Japan is necessary among both the swine and ruminant populations.
A first isolation of border disease virus (BDV) in Japan was from a pig on a farm without keeping any ruminants. Our previous study showed that this BDV, termed the FNK2012-1 strain, replicated inefficiently in swine-derived cells compared with those of ruminant origin. Pigs inoculated with this virus showed neither clinical symptoms nor viremia. In this study, we evaluated the pathogenicity of the FNK2012-1 strain in sheep, its natural host. The inoculated sheep showed clinical symptoms and transient viremia. Seroconversion was observed in the inoculated sheep. These results suggest that the FNK2012-1 strain was introduced from sheep and has not yet adapted to swine. Therefore, surveillance of border disease in Japan is necessary among both the swine and ruminant populations.
The genus Pestivirus within the family Flaviviridae mainly
comprises bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) of cattle, classical swine fever virus (CSFV) of
pigs and border disease virus (BDV) of sheep [12].
Diseases caused by these viruses have a deleterious impact on livestock economy. These
pestiviruses are genetically and antigenically related to each other. Thus, polyclonal
antisera against pestiviruses generally fail to distinguish among the species [6]. Classification of pestiviruses previously referred to
the host species from which they were isolated as described above. So far, numerous studies
have shown that pestiviruses are not highly host-specific. BVDV and BDV can cause disease in
domestic and wildlife ruminants, and swine. CSFV infection is restricted to swine in nature,
but CSFV can experimentally infect cattle and goats [8,
13].The first isolation of BDV in Japan was from the swine population [4]. The ailing pigs were kept in a sow-farrow-to-finish farm with no
ruminants. We recently reported the biological, genetic and antigenic characterization of one
strain of BDV, termed FNK2012-1, isolated from a persistently infected pig [7]. Experimental infection of weaned piglets with the
FNK2012-1 strain revealed that this isolate could not replicate efficiently. Therefore, the
FNK2012-1 strain is considered avirulent in pigs.In the present study, we assessed the pathogenicity of the BDV FNK2012-1 strain in sheep, its
natural host. To this end, four 10- to 16-week-old Suffolk crossbred lambs (JAPAN LAMB,
Hiroshima, Japan) were intranasally inoculated with 106.0 50% tissue culture
infectious dose (TCID50) of the FNK2012-1 strain per head from the virus seed stock
[7]. All lambs were deemed free of the main ovine
diseases by a regular passive survey and tested negative for BDV, BVDV, CSFV and their
antibodies by a neutralization test. The rectal temperatures and clinical symptoms of this
flock were monitored daily over the period of this experiment. Two inoculated lambs (#1 and
#2) were euthanized on day 5 post-inoculation (pi), and the tissue samples were aseptically
collected from their brains, tonsils, tracheas, lungs, spleens, adrenal glands, kidneys,
mesenteric lymph nodes and colons for virus isolation. Nasal swabs and blood were collected on
days 0, 1, 3 and 5 pi also for virus isolation. The remaining two infected lambs (#3 and #4)
were kept for 33 days and then euthanized. All collected tissue samples were homogenized in
Eagle’s minimum essential medium (MEM) to obtain a 10% suspension. Swabs were collected from
lambs #3 and #4 on days 0, 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, 15, 22, 25, 28 and 33 pi for virus isolation. Blood
was collected on days 0, 1, 5, 7, 10, 15, 22, 25, 28 and 33 pi to test for FNK2012-1
neutralization activity and virus isolation. Total leucocytes were counted using a pocH-100iV
Diff apparatus (Sysmex, Kobe, Japan) on days 0, 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, 22, 25, 28 and 33 pi. Virus
isolation was performed by inoculation of samples from tissues, swabs and blood into monolayer
of the swine kidney cell SK-L [10] on 6-well plates.
Virus titration was conducted for virus antigen-positive samples. Their titers are expressed
as TCID50 per ml (blood and swab) or gram (tissue) following the
formula of Reed and Muench [9]. Real-time PCR was
conducted for the virus antigen-positive samples followed by the protocol of La Rocca and
Sandvik [5]. Cells were stained using the
immunoperoxidase technique with anti-viral protein NS3 monoclonal antibody 46/1, as previously
described [3, 11]. This animal experiment was conducted in a biosafety level-2 facility at the
Graduate School of Veterinary Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan. The institutional
animal care and use committee of the Graduate School of Veterinary Medicine authorized this
animal experiment (approval number: 14-0069). The experiment was performed according to the
guidelines of this committee.Infection of lambs with the FNK2012-1 strain resulted in mild clinical symptoms in 3 out of
the 4 lambs: nasal discharge (#2 and #3) and depression (#3 and #4). Fever was observed in 3
of the 4 lambs within 10 days pi (Fig.
1). Transient leucopenia was also observed in the 3 lambs (Fig. 2). Hemorrhage was observed in the mesenteric lymph nodes of 1 lamb (#2) on day 5 pi.
Virus was isolated from the tonsils of lamb #2 and from the tonsils, lungs, spleen and
mesenteric lymph nodes of lamb #1 on day 5 pi (Table
1). The tonsil samples from lamb #1 and #2 were positive for virus genome by
real-time PCR (data not shown). Transient viremia was observed in 2 of the 4 lambs within 5
days pi (Table 2). In contrast, virus was not recovered from any nasal swabs obtained from the
inoculated lambs (data not shown). These results indicate that the FNK2012-1 strain is
pathogenic for sheep.
Fig. 1.
Body temperature of lambs before and after inoculation with border disease virus
FNK2012-1 strain. Four lambs were intranasally inoculated with the FNK2012-1 strain.
Rectal temperature was monitored daily beginning 3 days before inoculation. A body
temperature above 40.0°C was considered fever. “†” indicates the lambs were euthanized
at that time.
Fig. 2.
Leucocyte counts in lambs inoculated with the FNK2012-1 strain. Blood was collected on
days 0, 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, 22, 25, 28 and 33 post-inoculation (pi), and the leucocyte
counts were determined for each time point. “†” indicates the lambs were euthanized at
that time.
Table 1.
Virus recovery from tissues of lambs inoculated intranasally with FNK2012-1 strain
on day 5 post-inoculation
Ovine ID
Virus recovery from tissue (log10
TCID50/g)
Brain
Tonsil
Trachea
Lung
Spleen
Kidney
Adrenal gland
Mesenteric lymph node
Colon
1
−
5.8
−
+
+
−
−
3.0
−
2
−
2.8
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−: Not isolated, +: Isolated in a 6-well plate and was lower detection limit of
TCID50 (101.8 TCID50/ml) in a
96-well plate.
Table 2.
Virus recovery from blood of lambs inoculated intranasally with FNK2012-1
strain
Ovine ID
Virus recovery from blood on days pi (log10
TCID50/ml)
0
1
3
5
7
10
15
22
25
28
33
1
−
−
+
≤1.3
NT
NT
NT
NT
NT
NT
NT
2
−
−
−
−
NT
NT
NT
NT
NT
NT
NT
3
−
−
+
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
4
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−: Not isolated, +: Isolated in a 6-well plate and was lower detection limit of
TCID50 (100.8 TCID50/ml) in a
96-well plate, NT: Not tested.
Body temperature of lambs before and after inoculation with border disease virus
FNK2012-1 strain. Four lambs were intranasally inoculated with the FNK2012-1 strain.
Rectal temperature was monitored daily beginning 3 days before inoculation. A body
temperature above 40.0°C was considered fever. “†” indicates the lambs were euthanized
at that time.Leucocyte counts in lambs inoculated with the FNK2012-1 strain. Blood was collected on
days 0, 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, 22, 25, 28 and 33 post-inoculation (pi), and the leucocyte
counts were determined for each time point. “†” indicates the lambs were euthanized at
that time.−: Not isolated, +: Isolated in a 6-well plate and was lower detection limit of
TCID50 (101.8 TCID50/ml) in a
96-well plate.−: Not isolated, +: Isolated in a 6-well plate and was lower detection limit of
TCID50 (100.8 TCID50/ml) in a
96-well plate, NT: Not tested.A neutralization test used to detect anti-BDV, BVDV and CSFV antibodies was performed as
previously described [7]. Neutralizing antibody titer is
expressed as the reciprocal of the highest serum dilution that showed complete viral
neutralization. Seroconversion against the FNK2012-1 strain was detected in the remaining 2
lambs (#3 and #4) after day 22 pi (Fig. 3), even though virus was not isolated from lamb #4.
Fig. 3.
Virus neutralization titers against the FNK2012-1 strain from inoculated lambs. Sera
collected on days 0, 1, 5, 7, 10, 15, 22, 25, 28 and 33 pi were used to determine the
virus neutralization titer. “†” indicates the lambs were euthanized at that time.
Virus neutralization titers against the FNK2012-1 strain from inoculated lambs. Sera
collected on days 0, 1, 5, 7, 10, 15, 22, 25, 28 and 33 pi were used to determine the
virus neutralization titer. “†” indicates the lambs were euthanized at that time.In a previous study, a BDV 87/6 strain isolated from diseased pigs caused mild clinical
symptoms and viremia in weaned piglets, whereas infection was subclinical for sheep. In
contrast, the ovine isolate 137/4 caused disorders in sheep, however, its pathogenicity in
pigs was lower than that of the 87/6 strain [1]. The
FNK2012-1 strain replicated inefficiently in swine cells, compared with the ruminant cells.
The weaned piglets inoculated with the FNK2012-1 strain showed neither clinical symptoms nor
viremia. A small amount of virus was recovered from only mesenteric lymph nodes of an infected
pig [7]. The present study showed that infection of
lambs with the FNK2012-1 strain resulted in fever and transit viremia. A large amount of virus
was recovered from tonsils, and virus was also recovered from other tissues. All these data
strongly suggest that the FNK2012-1 strain has kept the pathogenicity in sheep and has not yet
adapted to pigs and was recently introduced to swine from the ovine population. However, there
is limited information available how this BDV strain was introduced into the swine population.
Only one epidemiological survey of BD among only the ovine population in Japan has been
reported so far [2]. Surveillance of classicalswinefever (CSF) and bovineviral diarrhea (BVD) is routinely conducted by veterinary service in
Japan. It is, therefore, important to perform surveillance of both virus isolation and
antibody detection of BDV among ruminant and swine populations for further analysis, leading
to control of not only BD but also CSF and BVD in Japan.
Authors: K Kameyama; Y Sakoda; K Tamai; H Igarashi; M Tajima; T Mochizuki; Y Namba; H Kida Journal: J Virol Methods Date: 2006-10-12 Impact factor: 2.014