CONTEXT: During team athletic events, athletic trainers commonly provide fluids with water bottles. When a limited number of water bottles exist, various techniques are used to deliver fluids. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether fluid delivered via water-bottle administration influenced fluid consumption and hydration status. DESIGN: Crossover study. SETTING: Outdoor field (22.2°C ± 3.5°C). PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Nineteen participants (14 men, 5 women, age = 30 ± 10 years, height = 176 ± 8 cm, mass = 72.5 ± 10 kg) were recruited from the university and local running clubs. INTERVENTION(S): The independent variable was fluid delivery with 3 levels: self-administration with mouth-to-bottle direct contact (SA-DC), self-administration with no contact between mouth and bottle (SA-NC), and external administration with no contact between the mouth and the bottle (EA-NC). Participants warmed up for 10 minutes before completing 5 exercise stations, after which an ad libitum fluid break was given, for a total of 6 breaks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): We measured the fluid variables of total volume consumed, total number of squirts, and average volume per squirt. Hydration status via urine osmolality and body-mass loss, and perceptual variables for thirst and fullness were recorded. We calculated repeated-measures analyses of variance to assess hydration status, fluid variables, and perceptual measures to analyze conditions across time. RESULTS: The total volume consumed for EA-NC was lower than for SA-DC (P = .001) and SA-NC (P = .001). The total number of squirts for SA-DC was lower than for SA-NC (P = .009). The average volume per squirt for EA-NC was lower than for SA-DC (P = .020) and SA-NC (P = .009). Participants arrived (601.0 ± 21.3 mOsm/L) and remained (622.3 ± 38.3 mOsm/L) hydrated, with no difference between conditions (P = .544); however, the EA-NC condition lost more body mass than did the SA-DC condition (P = .001). There was no main effect for condition on thirst (P = .147) or fullness (P = .475). CONCLUSIONS: External administration of fluid decreased total volume consumed via a decreased average volume per squirt. The SA-DC method requires fewer squirts within a specific time frame. Fluid breaks every 15 minutes resulted in maintenance of euhydration; however, loss of body mass was influenced by fluid administration. Athletic trainers should avoid external administration to promote positive hydration behaviors. When fluid is self-administered, individual bottles may be the best clinical practice because more volume can be consumed per squirt.
RCT Entities:
CONTEXT: During team athletic events, athletic trainers commonly provide fluids with water bottles. When a limited number of water bottles exist, various techniques are used to deliver fluids. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether fluid delivered via water-bottle administration influenced fluid consumption and hydration status. DESIGN: Crossover study. SETTING: Outdoor field (22.2°C ± 3.5°C). PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Nineteen participants (14 men, 5 women, age = 30 ± 10 years, height = 176 ± 8 cm, mass = 72.5 ± 10 kg) were recruited from the university and local running clubs. INTERVENTION(S): The independent variable was fluid delivery with 3 levels: self-administration with mouth-to-bottle direct contact (SA-DC), self-administration with no contact between mouth and bottle (SA-NC), and external administration with no contact between the mouth and the bottle (EA-NC). Participants warmed up for 10 minutes before completing 5 exercise stations, after which an ad libitum fluid break was given, for a total of 6 breaks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): We measured the fluid variables of total volume consumed, total number of squirts, and average volume per squirt. Hydration status via urine osmolality and body-mass loss, and perceptual variables for thirst and fullness were recorded. We calculated repeated-measures analyses of variance to assess hydration status, fluid variables, and perceptual measures to analyze conditions across time. RESULTS: The total volume consumed for EA-NC was lower than for SA-DC (P = .001) and SA-NC (P = .001). The total number of squirts for SA-DC was lower than for SA-NC (P = .009). The average volume per squirt for EA-NC was lower than for SA-DC (P = .020) and SA-NC (P = .009). Participants arrived (601.0 ± 21.3 mOsm/L) and remained (622.3 ± 38.3 mOsm/L) hydrated, with no difference between conditions (P = .544); however, the EA-NC condition lost more body mass than did the SA-DC condition (P = .001). There was no main effect for condition on thirst (P = .147) or fullness (P = .475). CONCLUSIONS: External administration of fluid decreased total volume consumed via a decreased average volume per squirt. The SA-DC method requires fewer squirts within a specific time frame. Fluid breaks every 15 minutes resulted in maintenance of euhydration; however, loss of body mass was influenced by fluid administration. Athletic trainers should avoid external administration to promote positive hydration behaviors. When fluid is self-administered, individual bottles may be the best clinical practice because more volume can be consumed per squirt.
Entities:
Keywords:
disease transmission; fluid breaks; hydration; water bottles
Authors: Margaret A Kolka; Willliam A Latzka; Scott J Montain; William P Corr; Karen K O'Brien; Michael N Sawka Journal: Aviat Space Environ Med Date: 2003-03
Authors: Susan W Yeargin; Douglas J Casa; Lawrence E Armstrong; Greig Watson; Daniel A Judelson; Eleni Psathas; Sarah L Sparrow Journal: J Strength Cond Res Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 3.775
Authors: Giannis Arnaoutis; Stavros A Kavouras; Yiannis P Kotsis; Yiannis E Tsekouras; Michalis Makrillos; Costas N Bardis Journal: Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab Date: 2012-11-19 Impact factor: 4.599
Authors: S S Kurdak; S M Shirreffs; R J Maughan; K T Ozgünen; C Zeren; S Korkmaz; Z Yazici; G Ersöz; M S Binnet; J Dvorak Journal: Scand J Med Sci Sports Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 4.221
Authors: R W Hubbard; B L Sandick; W T Matthew; R P Francesconi; J B Sampson; M J Durkot; O Maller; D B Engell Journal: J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol Date: 1984-09
Authors: S A Kavouras; G Arnaoutis; M Makrillos; C Garagouni; E Nikolaou; O Chira; E Ellinikaki; L S Sidossis Journal: Scand J Med Sci Sports Date: 2011-03-16 Impact factor: 4.221
Authors: Brendon P McDermott; Scott A Anderson; Lawrence E Armstrong; Douglas J Casa; Samuel N Cheuvront; Larry Cooper; W Larry Kenney; Francis G O'Connor; William O Roberts Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Haoyan Wang; Kate S Early; Bailey M Theall; Adam C Lowe; Nathan P Lemoine; Jack Marucci; Shelly Mullenix; Neil M Johannsen Journal: Medicina (Kaunas) Date: 2020-09-24 Impact factor: 2.430