Literature DB >> 25389319

Expert witness testimony guidelines: identifying areas for improvement.

Peter F Svider1, Jean Anderson Eloy2, Soly Baredes3, Michael Setzen4, Adam J Folbe5.   

Abstract

Expert witnesses play an invaluable, if controversial, role by deciphering medical events for juries in cases of alleged negligence. We review expert witness guidelines among major surgical societies and identify gaps within these standards, as our hope is that this spurs discussion addressing areas for improvement. Of 8 surgical societies with accessible guidelines, none included specific compensation guidelines or limits, detailed reporting mechanisms regarding unethical behavior by legal professionals, or addressed the appropriateness of testifying frequently and exclusively for one side. Several processes possibly deterring grossly inaccurate testimony have been adopted by other surgical societies and should potentially be addressed by the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. These include offering an expert witness testimony certification path, strengthening the formalized grievance process, and encouraging members to sign an affirmation statement. © American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery Foundation 2014.

Keywords:  ethics; expert witness testimony; malpractice litigation; medical malpractice; negligence

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25389319     DOI: 10.1177/0194599814556721

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  1 in total

1.  Testimony by otolaryngologists in defense of tobacco companies 2009-2014.

Authors:  Robert K Jackler
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 3.325

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.