Literature DB >> 25389211

The UP4FUN Intervention Effect on Breaking Up Sedentary Time in 10- to 12-Year-Old Belgian Children: The ENERGY-Project.

Maïté Verloigne1, Sveinung Berntsen, Nicola D Ridgers, Greet Cardon, Mai Chinapaw, Teatske Altenburg, Johannes Brug, Elling Bere, Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij, Wendy Van Lippevelde, Lea Maes.   

Abstract

There are currently no studies available reporting intervention effects on breaking up children's sedentary time. This study examined the UP4FUN intervention effect on objectively measured number of breaks in sedentary time, number of sedentary bouts (≥ 10 mins) and total and average amount of time spent in those sedentary bouts among 10- to 12-year-old Belgian children. The total sample included 354 children (mean age: 10.9 ± 0.7 years; 59% girls) with valid ActiGraph accelerometer data at pre- and posttest. Only few and small intervention effects were found, namely on total time spent in sedentary bouts immediately after school hours (4-6PM; β = -3.51mins) and on average time spent in sedentary bouts before school hours (6-8.30AM; β = -4.83mins) and immediately after school hours in favor of children from intervention schools (β = -2.71mins). Unexpectedly, girls from intervention schools decreased the number of breaks during school hours (8.30AM-4PM; β = -23.45breaks) and increased the number of sedentary bouts on a weekend day (β = +0.90bouts), whereas girls in control schools showed an increase in number of breaks and a decrease in number of bouts. In conclusion, UP4FUN did not have a consistent or substantial effect on breaking up children's sedentary time and these data suggest that more intensive and longer lasting interventions are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25389211     DOI: 10.1123/pes.2014-0039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Exerc Sci        ISSN: 0899-8493            Impact factor:   2.333


  5 in total

1.  Patterns of objectively measured sedentary time in 10- to 12-year-old Belgian children: an observational study within the ENERGY-project.

Authors:  Maïté Verloigne; Nicola D Ridgers; Mai Chinapaw; Teatske M Altenburg; Elling Bere; Wendy Van Lippevelde; Greet Cardon; Johannes Brug; Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 2.125

2.  Physical activity and sedentary time of youth in structured settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rafael M Tassitano; R Glenn Weaver; Maria Cecília M Tenório; Keith Brazendale; Michael W Beets
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 6.457

3.  Screen-based sedentary behavior and associations with functional strength in 6-15 year-old children in the United States.

Authors:  Lisa R Edelson; Kevin C Mathias; Victor L Fulgoni; Leonidas G Karagounis
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  School-based Interventions to Reduce Sedentary Behaviour in Children: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Lynda M Hegarty; Jacqueline L Mair; Karen Kirby; Elaine Murtagh; Marie H Murphy
Journal:  AIMS Public Health       Date:  2016-08-05

5.  The effectiveness and complexity of interventions targeting sedentary behaviour across the lifespan: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nicole E Blackburn; Jason J Wilson; Ilona I McMullan; Paolo Caserotti; Maria Giné-Garriga; Katharina Wirth; Laura Coll-Planas; Sergi Blancafort Alias; Marta Roqué; Manuela Deidda; Andrew T Kunzmann; Dhayana Dallmeier; Mark A Tully
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2020-04-25       Impact factor: 6.457

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.