Literature DB >> 25389075

Patient satisfaction in Caucasian and Mediterranean open rhinoplasty using the tongue-in-groove technique: prospective statistical analysis of change in subjective body image in relation to nasal appearance following aesthetic rhinoplasty.

Peter J F M Lohuis1, Frank R Datema.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Tongue-in-groove (TIG) is a conservative but powerful surgical suture technique to control shape, rotation, and projection of the nasal tip. In this study, statistical analyses were performed to determine the aesthetical and functional effectiveness of TIG rhinoplasty. STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study including 110 Caucasian or Mediterranean aesthetic rhinoplasty patients treated by one surgeon between 2007 and 2012, with a 1-year follow-up.
METHODS: Data were collected using the Utrecht Questionnaire, a validated instrument routinely offered to our patients before and 1 year after surgery. Aesthetic results were reflected by change in subjective body image in relation to nasal appearance, scored on five aesthetic questions and a 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS). Functional results were determined by change in subjective nasal airway patency, scored on a 10-cm VAS for both sides.
RESULTS: The mean aesthetic sum score (5, low burden-25, high burden) significantly improved from 14.01 to 6.54 (P <.01). The mean aesthetic VAS score (0, very ugly-10, very nice) significantly improved from 3.35 to 7.78 (P < .01). The mean functional VAS score (0, very bad-10, very good) showed a small but significant improvement on both sides (left, 6.83-7.96; right, 6.88-7.80; P <.01).
CONCLUSION: Statistical analysis of quantified subjective data on nasal aesthetics and function show that TIG is a reliable technique that can help to deliver consistently good results in Caucasian and Mediterranean patients seeking aesthetic rhinoplasty. A small additional functional improvement can be expected.
© 2014 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Outcome research, external rhinoplasty, tongue-in-groove, quality of life

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25389075     DOI: 10.1002/lary.25037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  4 in total

1.  Changes in elastic properties of the nasal tip using Columellar strut graft versus tongue-in-groove method over one year after rhinoplasty.

Authors:  Saeid Atighechi; Mohammadhossein Dadgarnia; Sedighe Vaziribozorg; Mohammadhossein Baradaranfar; Vahid Zand; Mojtaba Meybodian; Mohammad Mandegari; Shima Shirkhoda
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Reconstruction of nasal tip support in primary, open approach septorhinoplasty : A retrospective analysis between the tongue-in-groove technique and the columellar strut.

Authors:  Periklis Karaiskakis; Michael Bromba; Andreas Dietz; Michael Sand; Andreas Dacho
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Use of Routine Prospective Functional and Aesthetic Patient Satisfaction Measurements in Secondary Cleft Lip Rhinoplasty.

Authors:  Floris V W J van Zijl; Sarah Versnel; Egge F van der Poel; Robert J Baatenburg de Jong; Frank R Datema
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 4.611

4.  The effect of the tongue in groove technique on the nasolabial angle and nasal tip projection.

Authors:  Fatemeh Khabir; Mehdi Sezavar; Behnam Bohluli; Vahid Mesgarzadeh; Hamidreza Tavakoli
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2020-06-08
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.