Literature DB >> 25388998

Pectoralis major myocutaneous flap versus free fasciocutaneous flap for reconstruction of partial hypopharyngeal defects: what should we be doing?

Jerry W Chao1, Jason A Spector2, Erin M Taylor1, David M Otterburn2, David I Kutler3, Salvatore M Caruana4, Christine H Rohde1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Partial hypopharyngeal defects are most commonly reconstructed with the pectoralis major myocutaneous flap (PMMF) or free fasciocutaneous (FFC) flap. The purpose of this study is to determine the ideal method for reconstruction of partial hypopharyngeal defects by reviewing our institutional experience and the literature.
METHODS: A retrospective review of partial hypopharyngeal reconstructions since 2009 was performed. A National Library of Medicine search of studies on partial hypopharyngeal reconstruction since 1988 was performed. Data on complications, diet, and speech were extracted and pooled.
RESULTS: A total of 18 patients were studied-9 had PMMF reconstruction and 9 had FFC reconstruction. Operative time (8.75 vs. 13.0 hours, p = 0.0003) was shorter in the PMMF group. Pharyngocutaneous fistula developed in one PMMF patient (11.1%) and two FFC patients (22.2%). Late strictures occurred in three PMMF patients. Six patients in each group (66.7%) progressed to a regular diet. Three patients in each group produced tracheoesophageal speech after TEP. Literature review identified 36 relevant studies, with 301 patients reconstructed with PMMF and 605 patients with FFC. Pooled-data analysis revealed that PMMF had higher reported rates of fistula (24.7 vs. 8.9%, p < 0.0001) and requirement for second surgery (11.3 vs. 5.5%, p = 0.04). There was no difference in stricture rates or progression to regular diet. Fewer PMMF patients produced tracheoesophageal speech (17.5 vs. 52.1%, p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: PMMF and FFC flaps are valid approaches to reconstructing partial hypopharyngeal defects, though rates in the literature of fistula, need for revisional surgery, and tracheoesophageal speech after laryngectomy are more favorable after free flap reconstruction. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25388998     DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1395417

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Reconstr Microsurg        ISSN: 0743-684X            Impact factor:   2.873


  5 in total

1.  Safety of the supraclavicular artery island flap in the setting of neck dissection and radiation therapy.

Authors:  Shantanu N Razdan; Claudia R Albornoz; Teresa Ro; Peter G Cordeiro; Joseph J Disa; Colleen M McCarthy; Carrie S Stern; Evan S Garfein; Evan Matros
Journal:  J Reconstr Microsurg       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 2.873

2.  Pharyngocutaneous and tracheoesophageal fistula closure using supraclavicular artery island flap.

Authors:  Sérgio Teixeira; Joana Costa; Diana Monteiro; Isabel Bartosch; Inês Ínsua-Pereira; Bernardo Correia; Álvaro Silva
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Risk Factors of and Treatments for Pharyngocutaneous Fistula Occurring after Oropharynx and Hypopharynx Reconstruction.

Authors:  Su Bin Do; Chul Hoon Chung; Yong Joon Chang; Byeong Jun Kim; Young Soo Rho
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2017-10-26

4.  Pectoralis major myocutaneous flap in salvage reconstruction following free flap failure in head and neck cancer surgery.

Authors:  Wei Wei; Yongsheng Qiu; Qigen Fang; Yingping Jia
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 1.671

5.  Hypopharynx reconstruction for primary hypopharyngeal carcinoma: a retrospective study and literature review.

Authors:  Yu Heng; Duo Zhang; Xiaoke Zhu; Liang Zhou; Ming Zhang; Kenan Li; Lei Tao
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 1.241

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.