Literature DB >> 25388955

Phenotypic identification of subclones in multiple myeloma with different chemoresistant, cytogenetic and clonogenic potential.

T Paíno1, B Paiva2, J M Sayagués3, I Mota4, T Carvalheiro5, L A Corchete1, I Aires-Mejía6, J J Pérez6, M L Sanchez4, P Barcena4, E M Ocio7, L San-Segundo1, M E Sarasquete8, R García-Sanz8, M-B Vidriales8, A Oriol9, M-T Hernández10, M-A Echeveste11, A Paiva5, J Blade12, J-J Lahuerta13, A Orfao3, M-V Mateos8, N C Gutiérrez8, J F San-Miguel2.   

Abstract

Knowledge about clonal diversity and selection is critical to understand multiple myeloma (MM) pathogenesis, chemoresistance and progression. If targeted therapy becomes reality, identification and monitoring of intraclonal plasma cell (PC) heterogeneity would become increasingly demanded. Here we investigated the kinetics of intraclonal heterogeneity among 116 MM patients using 23-marker multidimensional flow cytometry (MFC) and principal component analysis, at diagnosis and during minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring. Distinct phenotypic subclones were observed in 35/116 (30%) newly diagnosed MM patients. In 10/35 patients, persistent MRD was detected after 9 induction cycles, and longitudinal comparison of patient-paired diagnostic vs MRD samples unraveled phenotypic clonal tiding after therapy in half (5/10) of the patients. After demonstrating selection of distinct phenotypic subsets by therapeutic pressure, we investigated whether distinct fluorescence-activated cell-sorted PC subclones had different clonogenic and cytogenetic profiles. In half (5/10) of the patients analyzed, distinct phenotypic subclones showed different clonogenic potential when co-cultured with stromal cells, and in 6/11 cases distinct phenotypic subclones displayed unique cytogenetic profiles by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization, including selective del(17p13). Collectively, we unravel potential therapeutic selection of preexisting diagnostic phenotypic subclones during MRD monitoring; because phenotypically distinct PCs may show different clonogenic and cytogenetic profiles, identification and follow-up of unique phenotypic-genetic myeloma PC subclones may become relevant for tailored therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25388955     DOI: 10.1038/leu.2014.321

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Leukemia        ISSN: 0887-6924            Impact factor:   11.528


  35 in total

1.  Xbp1s-negative tumor B cells and pre-plasmablasts mediate therapeutic proteasome inhibitor resistance in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Chungyee Leung-Hagesteijn; Natalie Erdmann; Grace Cheung; Jonathan J Keats; A Keith Stewart; Donna E Reece; Kim Chan Chung; Rodger E Tiedemann
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 31.743

2.  CD117 expression in gammopathies is associated with an altered maturation of the myeloid and lymphoid hematopoietic cell compartments and favorable disease features.

Authors:  Martin Schmidt-Hieber; Martin Pérez-Andrés; Bruno Paiva; Juan Flores-Montero; Jose J Perez; Norma C Gutierrez; Maria-Belen Vidriales; Sergio Matarraz; Jesus F San Miguel; Alberto Orfao
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 9.941

3.  EuroFlow antibody panels for standardized n-dimensional flow cytometric immunophenotyping of normal, reactive and malignant leukocytes.

Authors:  J J M van Dongen; L Lhermitte; S Böttcher; J Almeida; V H J van der Velden; J Flores-Montero; A Rawstron; V Asnafi; Q Lécrevisse; P Lucio; E Mejstrikova; T Szczepański; T Kalina; R de Tute; M Brüggemann; L Sedek; M Cullen; A W Langerak; A Mendonça; E Macintyre; M Martin-Ayuso; O Hrusak; M B Vidriales; A Orfao
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 4.  Overview of clinical flow cytometry data analysis: recent advances and future challenges.

Authors:  Carlos E Pedreira; Elaine S Costa; Quentin Lecrevisse; Jacques J M van Dongen; Alberto Orfao
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 19.536

5.  Improving overall survival and overcoming adverse prognosis in the treatment of cytogenetically high-risk multiple myeloma.

Authors:  P Leif Bergsagel; María-Victoria Mateos; Norma C Gutierrez; S Vincent Rajkumar; Jesús F San Miguel
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Minor clone provides a reservoir for relapse in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  F Magrangeas; H Avet-Loiseau; W Gouraud; L Lodé; O Decaux; P Godmer; L Garderet; L Voillat; T Facon; A M Stoppa; G Marit; C Hulin; P Casassus; M Tiab; E Voog; E Randriamalala; K C Anderson; P Moreau; N C Munshi; S Minvielle
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 11.528

7.  Single-cell genetic analysis reveals the composition of initiating clones and phylogenetic patterns of branching and parallel evolution in myeloma.

Authors:  L Melchor; A Brioli; C P Wardell; A Murison; N E Potter; M F Kaiser; R A Fryer; D C Johnson; D B Begum; S Hulkki Wilson; G Vijayaraghavan; I Titley; M Cavo; F E Davies; B A Walker; G J Morgan
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 11.528

8.  Whole-genome sequencing of multiple myeloma from diagnosis to plasma cell leukemia reveals genomic initiating events, evolution, and clonal tides.

Authors:  Jan B Egan; Chang-Xin Shi; Waibhav Tembe; Alexis Christoforides; Ahmet Kurdoglu; Shripad Sinari; Sumit Middha; Yan Asmann; Jessica Schmidt; Esteban Braggio; Jonathan J Keats; Rafael Fonseca; P Leif Bergsagel; David W Craig; John D Carpten; A Keith Stewart
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Clonal competition with alternating dominance in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Jonathan J Keats; Marta Chesi; Jan B Egan; Victoria M Garbitt; Stephen E Palmer; Esteban Braggio; Scott Van Wier; Patrick R Blackburn; Angela S Baker; Angela Dispenzieri; Shaji Kumar; S Vincent Rajkumar; John D Carpten; Michael Barrett; Rafael Fonseca; A Keith Stewart; P Leif Bergsagel
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  Intraclonal heterogeneity is a critical early event in the development of myeloma and precedes the development of clinical symptoms.

Authors:  Brian A Walker; Christopher P Wardell; Lorenzo Melchor; Annamaria Brioli; David C Johnson; Martin F Kaiser; Fabio Mirabella; Lucia Lopez-Corral; Sean Humphray; Lisa Murray; Mark Ross; David Bentley; Norma C Gutiérrez; Ramón Garcia-Sanz; Jesus San Miguel; Faith E Davies; David Gonzalez; Gareth J Morgan
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 11.528

View more
  29 in total

Review 1.  New criteria for response assessment: role of minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Bruno Paiva; Jacques J M van Dongen; Alberto Orfao
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 2.  MGUS to myeloma: a mysterious gammopathy of underexplored significance.

Authors:  Madhav V Dhodapkar
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Phenotypic and functional characterization of a bortezomib-resistant multiple myeloma cell line by flow and mass cytometry.

Authors:  Linda B Baughn; Zohar Sachs; Klara E Noble-Orcutt; Amit Mitra; Brian G Van Ness; Michael A Linden
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2016-12-16

4.  T Cells Genetically Modified to Express an Anti-B-Cell Maturation Antigen Chimeric Antigen Receptor Cause Remissions of Poor-Prognosis Relapsed Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Jennifer N Brudno; Irina Maric; Steven D Hartman; Jeremy J Rose; Michael Wang; Norris Lam; Maryalice Stetler-Stevenson; Dalia Salem; Constance Yuan; Steven Pavletic; Jennifer A Kanakry; Syed Abbas Ali; Lekha Mikkilineni; Steven A Feldman; David F Stroncek; Brenna G Hansen; Judith Lawrence; Rashmika Patel; Frances Hakim; Ronald E Gress; James N Kochenderfer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies for multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Lekha Mikkilineni; James N Kochenderfer
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 6.  Development of CAR-T cell therapies for multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Nico Gagelmann; Kristoffer Riecken; Christine Wolschke; Carolina Berger; Francis A Ayuk; Boris Fehse; Nicolaus Kröger
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 7.  The myeloma stem cell concept, revisited: from phenomenology to operational terms.

Authors:  Hans Erik Johnsen; Martin Bøgsted; Alexander Schmitz; Julie Støve Bødker; Tarec Christoffer El-Galaly; Preben Johansen; Peter Valent; Niklas Zojer; Els Van Valckenborgh; Karin Vanderkerken; Mark van Duin; Pieter Sonneveld; Martin Perez-Andres; Alberto Orfao; Karen Dybkær
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 9.941

8.  Prognostic value of antigen expression in multiple myeloma: a PETHEMA/GEM study on 1265 patients enrolled in four consecutive clinical trials.

Authors:  P Arana; B Paiva; M-T Cedena; N Puig; L Cordon; M-B Vidriales; N C Gutierrez; F Chiodi; L Burgos; L-L Anglada; J Martinez-Lopez; M-T Hernandez; A-I Teruel; M Gironella; M-A Echeveste; L Rosiñol; R Martinez; A Oriol; J De la Rubia; A Orfao; J Blade; J-J Lahuerta; M-V Mateos; J-F San Miguel
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 9.  Comprehensive characterization of circulating and bone marrow-derived multiple myeloma cells at minimal residual disease.

Authors:  Johannes M Waldschmidt; Praveen Anand; Birgit Knoechel; Jens G Lohr
Journal:  Semin Hematol       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 3.851

10.  The prognostic significance of CD45 expression by clonal bone marrow plasma cells in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Wilson I Gonsalves; Michael M Timm; S Vincent Rajkumar; William G Morice; Angela Dispenzieri; Francis K Buadi; Martha Q Lacy; David Dingli; Nelson Leung; Prashant Kapoor; Robert A Kyle; Morie A Gertz; Shaji K Kumar
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 3.156

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.